When are schedules typically posted? Doesn't look like many college coaches are planning on going.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
crossfire challenge
Collapse
X
-
GuestTags: None
- Quote
-
Guest
-
Guest
-
Guest
Because all the college coaches just spent 10 days here for the ecnl championships. Damn near every college was here in town for it.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Game Schedule (updated 7/2, 8am)
We have published the initial game schedule for the College Showcase Weekend. We will be making some adjustments over the next 24 hours. We are also working on the game schedule for the younger weekend and plan to publish that schedule no later than July 5th.
https://system.gotsport.com/org_event/events/15017
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Coaches aren’t going to go to tournaments like Crossfire, PAC, Timbers, or even Surf Cup in large masses anymore. MLS Next, ECNL, and GA events make it too easy for them to see strong players and teams without having to go to local tournaments. Still a decent event, but there’s not many kids getting recruited for D1 or D2 at something like this anymore.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View PostCoaches aren’t going to go to tournaments like Crossfire, PAC, Timbers, or even Surf Cup in large masses anymore. MLS Next, ECNL, and GA events make it too easy for them to see strong players and teams without having to go to local tournaments. Still a decent event, but there’s not many kids getting recruited for D1 or D2 at something like this anymore.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
I think soccer people (at the higher levels) understand that tournaments are strictly profit centers for the sponsoring organization and have little to do with quality play. Tournament formats that have multiple games/day are bad for players - sure they are fun to win, but they don't offer a lot of development. I've often said that at the older ages tournaments are a war of attrition and it's about the depth on the bench vs. the quality of the team. Events that provide adequate recovery or rest are better for players and for college coaches. I'm starting to see a lot of GotSport rankings where the top team in a club is dropping (because they don't play a lot of tournaments) and the 2nd team is ranked higher because they play more tournaments that offer points.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View PostI think soccer people (at the higher levels) understand that tournaments are strictly profit centers for the sponsoring organization and have little to do with quality play. Tournament formats that have multiple games/day are bad for players - sure they are fun to win, but they don't offer a lot of development. I've often said that at the older ages tournaments are a war of attrition and it's about the depth on the bench vs. the quality of the team. Events that provide adequate recovery or rest are better for players and for college coaches. I'm starting to see a lot of GotSport rankings where the top team in a club is dropping (because they don't play a lot of tournaments) and the 2nd team is ranked higher because they play more tournaments that offer points.
Or maybe you're a grinch. If you don't like summer tournaments, you are in the wrong sport. Playing games against other opponents, learning your new teams, bonding, traveling and on and on. I agree at the older age groups two games a day sucks, but for younger groups it's invaluable.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View PostCoaches aren’t going to go to tournaments like Crossfire, PAC, Timbers, or even Surf Cup in large masses anymore. MLS Next, ECNL, and GA events make it too easy for them to see strong players and teams without having to go to local tournaments. Still a decent event, but there’s not many kids getting recruited for D1 or D2 at something like this anymore.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
-
Guest
for older teams that advance to the semifinals and finals the schedule is ridiculous. 3 days of games and then day 4 with 2 games?
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View PostI think soccer people (at the higher levels) understand that tournaments are strictly profit centers for the sponsoring organization and have little to do with quality play. Tournament formats that have multiple games/day are bad for players - sure they are fun to win, but they don't offer a lot of development. I've often said that at the older ages tournaments are a war of attrition and it's about the depth on the bench vs. the quality of the team. Events that provide adequate recovery or rest are better for players and for college coaches. I'm starting to see a lot of GotSport rankings where the top team in a club is dropping (because they don't play a lot of tournaments) and the 2nd team is ranked higher because they play more tournaments that offer points.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
You are so wrong, holly Sh$t. I have been recruiting for years. I want winners and grinders at the college level. Most of time time I see pampered kids who can't play a very condensed college season with two games in three days. Seriously winning a college league championship has become easier because there are not as many grinders. case in point Gonzaga, wow just look at that no win roster.
- Quote
Comment
Comment