Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
But, the letter Cony sent was negative towards ECNL only if the cost was in the $7,000 to $8,000 range. However, it ended by praising a potential Thorns option which would, hypothetically, be less much expensive. I can only assume that some form of corporate sponsorship would offset the costs for the girls.
This was the gist of the point I think he was making. Not that girls soccer isn't worth the Alliance teams investing in. But, to help manage the overall costs per player.
It is all probably pie-in-the-sky dreaming anyhow. Until we see something tangible this is all conjecture.
Comment