Can we get someone with knowledge of these teams a preliminary ranking for the 2013/14 season?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Girls 02 Rankings
Collapse
X
-
UnregisteredTags: None
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAre you serious? Get a life.
Get off your high horse and get a life yourself.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCan we get someone with knowledge of these teams a preliminary ranking for the 2013/14 season?
-Top tier-
Vancouver
FC Portland
EMFC
Corvallis Valley
-Second tier-
3RSC
Sherwood
WUSC
Westside
-Third tier-
CFC
Eastside
Lake Oswego
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBased on Summer tournaments and Fall leagues.
-Top tier-
Vancouver
FC Portland
EMFC
Corvallis Valley
-Second tier-
3RSC
Sherwood
WUSC
Westside
-Third tier-
CFC
Eastside
Lake Oswego
This age group is tough to grade in oregon because many of the bigger clubs did an academy, unlike in washington where the bigger teams did A, B, C teams at u10. But from what I have seen the top teams should be: Washington Timbers, Thusc and sherwood. But its anyones guess how the rest will turn out. Its difficult in oregon to judge these. We should start finding out pretty soon into the summer though.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBased on Summer tournaments and Fall leagues.
-Top tier-
Vancouver
FC Portland
EMFC
Corvallis Valley
-Second tier-
3RSC
Sherwood
WUSC
Westside
-Third tier-
CFC
Eastside
Lake Oswego
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
What about united sa? They beat FC Portland 5-0 and beat thusc in semi at directors cup and made it to final and only lost in pk's
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCan we get someone with knowledge of these teams a preliminary ranking for the 2013/14 season?
Flight A Pts GP W L T GF GA GD
01. Tualatin Hills United SC United Emerald Black (OR) 39 5 4 1 0 25 5 20
02. EMFC 02 Force Blue 28 5 3 2 0 15 11 4
03. PCU Sesc Rose City Revolution (OR) 20 4 2 2 0 10 9 1
04. Southside SC Navy 12 4 1 3 0 6 17 -11
05. WT G02 Copa (OR) 5 4 0 4 0 5 23 -18
Flight B Pts GP W L T GF GA GD
01. Sherwood SC TS Fusion (OR) 47 5 5 0 0 22 5 17
02. United SA Tornadoes 31 5 3 2 0 13 9 4
03. FC Portland Academy 2002 Girls Navy 10 3 1 2 0 4 10 -6
04. Pacific FC G02 Blue 2 3 0 3 0 2 13 -11
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostUnder 10 Girls Gold
Flight A Pts GP W L T GF GA GD
01. Tualatin Hills United SC United Emerald Black (OR) 39 5 4 1 0 25 5 20
02. EMFC 02 Force Blue 28 5 3 2 0 15 11 4
03. PCU Sesc Rose City Revolution (OR) 20 4 2 2 0 10 9 1
04. Southside SC Navy 12 4 1 3 0 6 17 -11
05. WT G02 Copa (OR) 5 4 0 4 0 5 23 -18
Flight B Pts GP W L T GF GA GD
01. Sherwood SC TS Fusion (OR) 47 5 5 0 0 22 5 17
02. United SA Tornadoes 31 5 3 2 0 13 9 4
03. FC Portland Academy 2002 Girls Navy 10 3 1 2 0 4 10 -6
04. Pacific FC G02 Blue 2 3 0 3 0 2 13 -11
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThere you have it! End...of...discussion!
Can't argue with such a thoroughly illustrated statement.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt's as arbitrary as any other analysis at this age. At a minimum I would wait and see how Fall league goes. You will have an answer. Until then a lot of the larger clubs play with mixed teams (skill level). Come fall you will see them playing for keeps. But statistical ranking of U10's is just silly and meaningless.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
This thread is funny for several reasons:
1. They are 9-10yr olds.
2. No one has a clue what the other clubs will do...U10 results rarely translate into U11.
3. They are 9-10yr olds.
4. Half of the girls on the "B" team may be on the "A" team next year and vise versa.
5. They are 9-10yr olds.
6. At this age each team's development can ebb and flow dramatically week to week.
7. Let's see...oh yeah, they are 9-10yr olds.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
D1 commits
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThis thread is funny for several reasons:
1. They are 9-10yr olds.
2. No one has a clue what the other clubs will do...U10 results rarely translate into U11.
3. They are 9-10yr olds.
4. Half of the girls on the "B" team may be on the "A" team next year and vise versa.
5. They are 9-10yr olds.
6. At this age each team's development can ebb and flow dramatically week to week.
7. Let's see...oh yeah, they are 9-10yr olds.
- Quote
Comment
Comment