Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New U11B
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostFC will struggle at the younger ages. 1 U10 team and 1 U11 team. This is not healthy for FC.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWow, that is actually shocking. It sounds like the Timbers alliance clubs are growing a ton especially w the Boys at the younger ages. I just wonder if this is the trend? Younger players are thinking why start with a club that is not affiliated with the Timbers?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo one cares about the Timbers affiliation. It comes down to quality coaching. Westside will always get players because of the trend. The tide will turn. Parents will realize that WST do not have quality coaching. They will eventually move on because of the scholarships there, and also that WST use the kids as pawns instead of human beings. I call BS on the Timbers affiliation.
As the saying goes: "Hurt people hurt people."
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Exactly...
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWow, that is actually shocking. It sounds like the Timbers alliance clubs are growing a ton especially w the Boys at the younger ages. I just wonder if this is the trend? Younger players are thinking why start with a club that is not affiliated with the Timbers?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNothing could be better for soccer, then the Timbers being the only club in town... They will be the only teams in the area and will have to play with themselves....
I guess on the flip side, Washington has 2 superclubs (Crossfire and WP) and it seems to work ok. Maybe it can work.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI'm actually in the Timbers Alliance in one of the 3 clubs and I am wondering the same thing. The last thing I want is 3 clubs playing against each other. Things are moving quickly and I don't know what to think anymore. If FC has 1 U10 and 1 U11 Boys, the poster states this can't be healthy for FC. I wonder more and more - is this healthy for Oregon?
I guess on the flip side, Washington has 2 superclubs (Crossfire and WP) and it seems to work ok. Maybe it can work.
One should be careful what you wish for.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
And your choice...
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI can't wait to get this season started! Any thoughts on tryouts and the upcoming teams?
I believe last year in the U10 gold, the top teams were Eastside, Westside, OSA, Riverplate. Am I missing any? But it's a new year, a year older. Which teams will rise?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI can't wait to get this season started! Any thoughts on tryouts and the upcoming teams?
I believe last year in the U10 gold, the top teams were Eastside, Westside, OSA, Riverplate. Am I missing any? But it's a new year, a year older. Which teams will rise?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostEastside beat OSA in the finals of Directors cup both went undefeated last Fall season for U10. Eastside merged with fireballs team and looks to be the top of the upcoming age group for U11. Riverplate fell off as OSA beat them handily to make finals. Should be a great upcoming year.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostEastside beat OSA in the finals of Directors cup both went undefeated last Fall season for U10. Eastside merged with fireballs team and looks to be the top of the upcoming age group for U11. Riverplate fell off as OSA beat them handily to make finals. Should be a great upcoming year.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAre there any open spots on the premiere team at OSA? How many boys are on the team?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
U10 rankings
Here were the U10 rankings as of last year:
1. Eastside
2. OSA
3. Fireballs (was independent now with Eastside)
4. Riverplate
5. Westside
6. WSA
7. THUSC
8. LO
9. FC Portland
Eastside the class of the group, a drop off after 4 as Westside was good but never could beat the top teams, huge drop off after them compared to the top. Could all change for u11 but probably pretty similar.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[8QUOTE=Unregistered;763021]Here were the U10 rankings as of last year:
1. Eastside
2. OSA
3. Fireballs (was independent now with Eastside)
4. Riverplate
5. Westside
6. WSA
7. THUSC
8. LO
9. FC Portland
Eastside the class of the group, a drop off after 4 as Westside was good but never could beat the top teams, huge drop off after them compared to the top. Could all change for u11 but probably pretty similar.[/QUOTE]
Last April THUSC Titanium beat OSA Red, beat WSA in Fall and Fireballs during Summer, 10-1 vs LO.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHere were the U10 rankings as of last year:
1. Eastside
2. OSA
3. Fireballs (was independent now with Eastside)
4. Riverplate
5. Westside
6. WSA
7. THUSC
8. LO
9. FC Portland
Eastside the class of the group, a drop off after 4 as Westside was good but never could beat the top teams, huge drop off after them compared to the top. Could all change for u11 but probably pretty similar.
At U11, players and teams do somewhat come out of hiding a bit. Rec players that had never considered advanced competition show up here and there that make teams better. The other team(s) that are not represented here is VUSA. I heard they had enough players to make like 5 or 6 teams. What I don't know is whether they are teams of equal status or did they make A, B, ... I think they will be competing in OPL this year, but if the teams are equal you won't see their best team in Premier. Another unknown will be WSA. Word on the street is that they took the best of WSA, some of the best of VUSA, and some of the best of SC to make a really strong team. If so, they could move up.
- Quote
Comment
Comment