Trump/DeSantis Ticket would be like if ECNL/GA merged

[Guest]

He has no answer because none of the places he gets his so-called "REAL RESEARCH" or news from has addressed those points. He hasn't been told what to say yet. Give him time....lol

Anyone who really thinks that Trump had the nuclear codes at Mar-A-Largo and was going to sell them to Russia has to be the most stupidest person on earth. The sad part is that many Democrats believe this which goes to show how unbelievably stupid these people are. I would normally laugh at their stupidity but I can’t because these idiots, no matter how stupid they are, know how to cast a vote and if you get enough of these idiots in a voting district, they can sway an election. If you dopes want to learn something, probably not, but the nuclear codes get changed every time a new administration and president take over.

[Guest]

Anyone who really thinks that Trump had the nuclear codes at Mar-A-Largo and was going to sell them to Russia has to be the most stupidest person on earth. The sad part is that many Democrats believe this which goes to show how unbelievably stupid these people are. I would normally laugh at their stupidity but I can’t because these idiots, no matter how stupid they are, know how to cast a vote and if you get enough of these idiots in a voting district, they can sway an election. If you dopes want to learn something, probably not, but the nuclear codes get changed every time a new administration and president take over.

I don't know what he had but I do not believe he was trying to sell those per se, but I also am very bothered and concerned he had any documents there. Though I am not a Democrat, I feel the same way about this ridiculous and crazy mob of maga followers who have taken over our party. They are destroying the party, I am not sure it will survive this.

[Guest]

Anyone who really thinks that Trump had the nuclear codes at Mar-A-Largo and was going to sell them to Russia has to be the most stupidest person on earth. The sad part is that many Democrats believe this which goes to show how unbelievably stupid these people are. I would normally laugh at their stupidity but I can’t because these idiots, no matter how stupid they are, know how to cast a vote and if you get enough of these idiots in a voting district, they can sway an election. If you dopes want to learn something, probably not, but the nuclear codes get changed every time a new administration and president take over.

It was the trump-humping troll that brought up the subject of nuclear codes in post #317. Nobody on this board who lives in reality is asserting that the classified Mar-a-Lago docs contain NUCLEAR CODES.

Still waiting for our troll to provide an innocent explanation for why trump had those docs and refused to return them. It's obvious he wants to benefit personally somehow (national security be damned) , but trumpworld is comically trying to pivot the narrative to the judge and the FBI, going so far as to have their lives threatened. Tragically shameful.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;n4373070]

It was the trump-humping troll that brought up the subject of nuclear codes in post #317. Nobody on this board who lives in reality is asserting that the classified Mar-a-Lago docs contain NUCLEAR CODES.

Still waiting for our troll to provide an innocent explanation for why trump had those docs and refused to return them. It's obvious he wants to benefit personally somehow (national security be damned) , but trumpworld is comically trying to pivot the narrative to the judge and the FBI, going so far as to have their lives threatened. Tragically shameful.

If you been following the actual news and not the “fake news” you would realize that the president has the ability to declassify everything and anything and according to Trump has already declassified whatever files he had at home. With that said, Trump has been in negotiation with the depart of records to retrieve and to add addition security to whatever he was storing at home. The DOJ made a huge mistake going into a former Presidents home, especially that it wasn’t done to any previous presidents, they violated the 4th amendment. Additionally, they tried to do the same thing to Bill Clinton but a judge refused which set precedent and will be used against the DOJ. The DOJ is in a heap of trouble but you wouldn’t know that because you don’t READ!!

[Guest]

If you been following the actual news and not the “fake news” you would realize that the president has the ability to declassify everything and anything and according to Trump has already declassified whatever files he had at home. With that said, Trump has been in negotiation with the depart of records to retrieve and to add addition security to whatever he was storing at home. The DOJ made a huge mistake going into a former Presidents home, especially that it wasn’t done to any previous presidents, they violated the 4th amendment. Additionally, they tried to do the same thing to Bill Clinton but a judge refused which set precedent and will be used against the DOJ. The DOJ is in a heap of trouble but you wouldn’t know that because you don’t READ!!

Please provide links to the so-called "actual news" that is reporting those things.

Every reliable news source is correctly reporting that to declassify something, there are procedures to be followed. trump didn't follow them. Also, the president doesn't have the power to declassify nuclear documents

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/08/tr...ify-documents/
https://www.lawfareblog.com/can-trum...s-unclassified
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ts-classified/
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...uments/671119/

Also, the three laws cited in the search warrant don't require the docs to be classified. You so-called "actual news" sources probably forgot to tell you that.

What is your innocent explanation for trump taking these docs to Mar-a-Lago and refusing to return them? I will keep asking until you stop running away from this.

[Guest]

Please provide links to the so-called "actual news" that is reporting those things.

Every reliable news source is correctly reporting that to declassify something, there are procedures to be followed. trump didn't follow them. Also, the president doesn't have the power to declassify nuclear documents

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/08/tr...ify-documents/
https://www.lawfareblog.com/can-trum...s-unclassified
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ts-classified/
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...uments/671119/

Also, the three laws cited in the search warrant don't require the docs to be classified. You so-called "actual news" sources probably forgot to tell you that.

What is your innocent explanation for trump taking these docs to Mar-a-Lago and refusing to return them? I will keep asking until you stop running away from this.

So in your feeble brain you think that the raid was because Trump didn’t follow process??
It was a fishing expedition, the warrant was extremely broad.
the DOJ is in a heap of trouble!

Every president takes home with him tons of documents, Trump was no different and according to affidavits, he was communicating with the DOJ for the return as recently as June.

You really are a dope! Get a life! You are too stupid to vote!

[Guest]

Please provide links to the so-called "actual news" that is reporting those things.

Every reliable news source is correctly reporting that to declassify something, there are procedures to be followed. trump didn't follow them. Also, the president doesn't have the power to declassify nuclear documents

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/08/tr...ify-documents/
https://www.lawfareblog.com/can-trum...s-unclassified
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ts-classified/
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...uments/671119/

Also, the three laws cited in the search warrant don't require the docs to be classified. You so-called "actual news" sources probably forgot to tell you that.

What is your innocent explanation for trump taking these docs to Mar-a-Lago and refusing to return them? I will keep asking until you stop running away from this.

Stop citing left wing periodicals, you might of well go to Brian Stelter for Reliable Sources! Oh wait, he got fired, and the show canceled for making up propaganda because feeble minded Americans like yourself thought it was fact. I can’t believe you used Fact-check.org OMG, the worst lying, biased organization! You really are stupid!

[Guest]

Stop citing left wing periodicals, you might of well go to Brian Stelter for Reliable Sources! Oh wait, he got fired, and the show canceled for making up propaganda because feeble minded Americans like yourself thought it was fact. I can’t believe you used Fact-check.org OMG, the worst lying, biased organization! You really are stupid!

Overall, Factcheck.org is a least biased credible fact-checker that is Very High for factual reporting due to impeccable sourcing of information. These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/factcheck/

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers. These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/lawfare-blog/

Ok, your turn. Please cite sources for the following claims you made:

"the president has the ability to declassify everything and anything"

"Trump has been in negotiation with the depart of records to retrieve and to add addition security to whatever he was storing at home"

"It was a fishing expedition, the warrant was extremely broad"

"Every president takes home with him tons of documents"

One would think a person claiming to have two advanced degrees, and who regularly calls everybody else stupid, would be able to back up his claims instead of talking completely out of his azz or copy/pasting from discredited sources.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;n4373239]

Overall, Factcheck.org is a least biased credible fact-checker that is Very High for factual reporting due to impeccable sourcing of information. These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/factcheck/

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers. These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/lawfare-blog/

Ok, your turn. Please cite sources for the following claims you made:





One would think a person claiming to have two advanced degrees, and who regularly calls everybody else stupid, would be able to back up his claims instead of talking completely out of his azz or copy/pasting from discredited sources.

https://censortrack.org/organization/factcheck-org
https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/...l-records.html

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;n4373349]

https://censortrack.org/organization/factcheck-org
https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/...l-records.html

That's your response? You must be the stupidest and laziest troll on Talking Soccer. Care to explain how either of those links backs up any of the ridiculous claims you vomited out here today?

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;n4373369][QUOTE=Guest;n4373349]

That's your response? You must be the stupidest and laziest troll on Talking Soccer. Care to explain how either of those links backs up any of the ridiculous claims you vomited out here today?

You dope READ!!!
until you read and read with comprehension then i will respond.
I don’t need to answer in a child like format. The answers to your argument are all in the 2 links I sent you. If you can’t extrapolate the info, then you are just too stupid and I can’t help you!

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;n4373398][QUOTE=Guest;n4373369]

That's your response? You must be the stupidest and laziest troll on Talking Soccer. Care to explain how either of those links backs up any of the ridiculous claims you vomited out here today?

You dope READ!!!
until you read and read with comprehension then i will respond.
I don’t need to answer in a child like format. The answers to your argument are all in the 2 links I sent you. If you can’t extrapolate the info, then you are just too stupid and I can’t help you!

I’ll help you out, https://jimbovard.com/blog/2022/02/2...ouse-mischief/
https://trendingpolitics.com/the-doj...pit-bull-knab/
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politic...ition-n1620970

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;n4373409][QUOTE=Guest;n4373398][QUOTE=Guest;n4373369]

I’ll help you out, https://jimbovard.com/blog/2022/02/2...ouse-mischief/
https://trendingpolitics.com/the-doj...pit-bull-knab/
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politic...ition-n1620970


Great articles, thanks!
Definitely answers the liberal dopes questions.
Unfortunately he can’t READ, or has selective reading to periodicals like move.org or fact-check.org all funded by Soros.
Maybe he will go away now!
He needs to ask himself if the DOJ is impartial then they should have no reason to not let an independent third party examine what they stole from Trumps home!

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;n4373409][QUOTE=Guest;n4373398]

I’ll help you out, https://jimbovard.com/blog/2022/02/2...ouse-mischief/
https://trendingpolitics.com/the-doj...pit-bull-knab/
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politic...ition-n1620970

I read every bit of all 5 pieces you linked. Did YOU actually read them, or did you just paste the top links after a sloppy brainless google search? I'm guessing the latter, because they don't help your case.

The censortrack piece attempted to throw shade on factcheck.org. Censortrack was founded by a man who served a stint in the Patrick Buchanan campaign (yes the well-known nazi sympathizer) with the purpose of attacking left-wing media.
Here's an example of their "proof" that factcheck is biased": "FactCheck focuses far more on President Donald Trump than other politicians" Um, maybe because he was the president and kept doing sketchy things? Sorry, I'm going to trust factcheck.org, especially when multiple other outlets reported the same thing.

The archive.org link went to a description of the presidential records act. No argument with that. How exactly does that back up anything you said?

I'm guessing you didn't actually read the jimbovard.com article because it says. "The Presidential Records act is critical to our democracy, in which the government is held accountable by the people", followed by a weak argument that it's not always enforced. None of which excuses what trump did.

The trending politics piece is a right-wing shoot-the-messenger hack job. It argues the because the DOJ official that met with the trump team before the raid previously worked for Robert Mueller, that somehow the raid was unjustified. Huh? Your fourth grade debate coach would have given that a D-minus

The last link asks the question, "Is this proof the Mar-a-Lago raid was a fishing expedition?" You must have not read past the headline, because the clear answer in NO. The FBI found exactly what they were looking for - how exactly is that a fishing expedition?

Next time don't be such a lazy POS and make sure your links actually say what you claim.

This is the second time I've asked you to back up your BS and the second time you've failed. One would think a person claiming to have two advanced degrees would engage some critical thinking and begin to wonder if they're being lied to.

[Guest]

And finally, just for laughs, there's this from foxnews.com:

"The Trump Mar-a-Lago search was justified"
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trum...arch-justified

Your favorite "actual news source" wouldn't lie to you, would they?