The counter
Wow! Someone offers there opinion and they are accused of being ignorant or mentally unstable or worse they have problems in there lives. Well as an LISC parent guess what there Is no opposing team agenda or anything else. strictly one person’s experience that may counter the hype. How many times has anyone heard the same thing about the rough riders being a money hungry org? Of course, they are a for profit business. LISC is LIRR. Have you done their clinics? Tons of kids and how much individual attention do they recieve? Ultimately it’s up to the kids to learn and develop but when you pay a lot of money for something extra is it worth it when the kid is stellar and program is so so. How about it if the kid needs some individual attention but blends in with the crowd? If other LISC parents don’t like what is being said, remember not everyone’s experience is the same. My kid wasn’t Cut but other competent kids were that with more individual attention (true development) could have stayed on.if they are not good enough to stay then why were they picked in the first place? Filling roster spots, lack of interest to tryout or possibly to ensure money is coming in? This begs the question, are academies worth it especially for kids as young as 10 or 11? Why introduce them at these ages to commitments which entangle to one sport with the allusion of scholarships etc. DA should only be for the top tier in the state only one team because that is what the talent poll will sustain especially with the current “Academy” model.
Wow! Someone offers there opinion and they are accused of being ignorant or mentally unstable or worse they have problems in there lives. Well as an LISC parent guess what there Is no opposing team agenda or anything else. strictly one person’s experience that may counter the hype. How many times has anyone heard the same thing about the rough riders being a money hungry org? Of course, they are a for profit business. LISC is LIRR. Have you done their clinics? Tons of kids and how much individual attention do they recieve? Ultimately it’s up to the kids to learn and develop but when you pay a lot of money for something extra is it worth it when the kid is stellar and program is so so. How about it if the kid needs some individual attention but blends in with the crowd? If other LISC parents don’t like what is being said, remember not everyone’s experience is the same. My kid wasn’t Cut but other competent kids were that with more individual attention (true development) could have stayed on.if they are not good enough to stay then why were they picked in the first place? Filling roster spots, lack of interest to tryout or possibly to ensure money is coming in? This begs the question, are academies worth it especially for kids as young as 10 or 11? Why introduce them at these ages to commitments which entangle to one sport with the allusion of scholarships etc. DA should only be for the top tier in the state only one team because that is what the talent poll will sustain especially with the current “Academy” model.
Comment