Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Revolution Academy needs to make some changes.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Revs U19 won 5-1
    The Revs 2003s beat the Bolts 2002s.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Yawn of course they did. Oh wait don’t Bolts gps and nefc have dozens of college commits?
      Revs should win at soccer. Where they lose is college commitment and future lifetime earnings for their players.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Revs U19 won 5-1
        That's the only good team the Revs have.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Revs U19 won 5-1
          So the only team safe from Coach Arena’s clean sweep strategy is the one that is aging out?

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            So the only team safe from Coach Arena’s clean sweep strategy is the one that is aging out?
            My kid is on a younger team, but the clean sweep strategy is the only one that will work with this sh*t show

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              So the only team safe from Coach Arena’s clean sweep strategy is the one that is aging out?
              Ha Ha. Arena. Clean sweep. A good ole boy playing the good ole boy game. He will leave the academy in the obvious capable declared hands of the phenom Scales.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                The Revs 2003s beat the Bolts 2002s.
                Sadly the most significant match we’ll play this season was against the Bolts and we barely won. We don’t have the best players.

                Comment


                  I just looked at the game report for the Revs v Bolts U17 match. The Revs had 6 players go the entire 90+ minutes. What I was amazed to discover is that the Bolts had 10 players on the pitch for 90+ minutes. TEN? Do they not realize that subbing can be a strategy? No wonder they lost. Fresh legs won out.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    I just looked at the game report for the Revs v Bolts U17 match. The Revs had 6 players go the entire 90+ minutes. What I was amazed to discover is that the Bolts had 10 players on the pitch for 90+ minutes. TEN? Do they not realize that subbing can be a strategy? No wonder they lost. Fresh legs won out.
                    All depends on who you have on the bench. There's also limited sub rules in DA. Also, if you weren't at the game how do you know fresh legs was the determinant? It was a one point differential game. Could have been close the whole way, or one side may have dominated but the weaker side got a lucky break. The two teams are close in league standings so that outcome sounds about right. On any given Sunday...

                    Or maybe you're a Bolts dad upset your kid didn't play.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      All depends on who you have on the bench. There's also limited sub rules in DA. Also, if you weren't at the game how do you know fresh legs was the determinant? It was a one point differential game. Could have been close the whole way, or one side may have dominated but the weaker side got a lucky break. The two teams are close in league standings so that outcome sounds about right. On any given Sunday...

                      Or maybe you're a Bolts dad upset your kid didn't play.
                      The Revs subbed 4 more players than the Bolts. You’ve obviously never competed for 90+ minutes against subs with fresh legs. Those 4 Revs subs came in at 64’, 64’, 80’ and 83’. If you don’t have an appropriate number or quality of players to sub in that’s on the coaches and scouts. I don’t care where they are in the standings.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        The Revs subbed 4 more players than the Bolts. You’ve obviously never competed for 90+ minutes against subs with fresh legs. Those 4 Revs subs came in at 64’, 64’, 80’ and 83’. If you don’t have an appropriate number or quality of players to sub in that’s on the coaches and scouts. I don’t care where they are in the standings.
                        Revs - 8th place with 8-9-3 and -9GD
                        Bolts - 9th place with with 10-12-2 and 0 GD

                        Prior game was a one point win for the Revs as well. Not sure why you're in such a fury over substitutions unless your kid wasn't put on the field. Plenty of teams don't have deep benches - it's the result of the watering down of youth soccer with too many leagues and clubs. This time of year is also really busy and sometimes kids are missing. The fact that they only had 14 on the game roster reflects that. If the 3 benchwarmers aren't very good how much will a coach sub them?

                        Comment


                          Have the Revs released their annual college commit list yet?

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Have the Revs released their annual college commit list yet?
                            Not officially but their commits are in the commit thread. One they're claiming has only played a few games for the club.

                            Comment


                              Only GPS has posted an extensive list.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                The Revs 2003s beat the Bolts 2002s.
                                All but 2-3 of the Bolts u17s are sophomores, with only a few months or sometimes weeks between Revs and Bolts starters. Most of them played with or against each other on NPL teams a while back. Valeo, NEFC, GPS most;t. It’s a myth, or an excuse, that the Revs are a young team. Hardly any freshmen out there today. A couple on each team perhaps.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X