Revs roster

[Unregistered]

Just because they won doesn't mean parents aren't bit*hing about lack of PT or coaches not playing their superstars in their "natural" positions

Half the players left angry. Maybe the U13 guys happy?

[Unregistered]

Half the players left angry. Maybe the U13 guys happy?

2003s are the strongest age group, deal with it.

[Unregistered]

laughing out loud at all of this. none of it is a surprise to anyone who has been involved with the Revs. parents realizing their studs aren't all that and that parents can't do or say anything about it. you were warned folks

[Unregistered]

2003s are the strongest age group, deal with it.

Maybe but the point was that they had fewer players. Who is the golden boy?

[Unregistered]

laughing out loud at all of this. none of it is a surprise to anyone who has been involved with the Revs. parents realizing their studs aren't all that and that parents can't do or say anything about it. you were warned folks

I guess we can see how the Revs first team sucks based on who they anoint in academy.

[Unregistered]

I guess we can see how the Revs first team sucks based on who they anoint in academy.

Sorry your kid isn't one of them. Tell him to work harder

[Unregistered]

Sorry your kid isn't one of them. Tell him to work harder

Why? My kids team beat the Revs.

[Unregistered]

Sorry your kid isn't one of them. Tell him to work harder

Every coach is different.

[Unregistered]

laughing out loud at all of this. none of it is a surprise to anyone who has been involved with the Revs. parents realizing their studs aren't all that and that parents can't do or say anything about it. you were warned folks

Revs are no different than any other club on the planet. You can either choose a high level team and risk reduced playing time, or you can drop down a level and be a stud. The only 22 players on earth this is not true for are the Real and Barca starters.

[Unregistered]

U13s played up 80 min on U14-

No, all the U13s played small parts in the 14s game and 13s team were still awesome without them.

[Unregistered]

No, all the U13s played small parts in the 14s game and 13s team were still awesome without them.

Wrong. One played the entire game, the 'striker' played 3/4 and the third played ~15 min.

But yes 5-0 looks like an easy win.

[Unregistered]

Wrong. One played the entire game, the 'striker' played 3/4 and the third played ~15 min.

But yes 5-0 looks like an easy win.

Sounds reasonable, why the gripes? Two U14s playing up with the 16s so it balances out.

[Unregistered]

Sounds reasonable, why the gripes? Two U14s playing up with the 16s so it balances out.

More like 4 U14's playing up. Looks like the 13's got preferential treatment. Oh well - that's life.

[Unregistered]

2003s are the strongest age group, deal with it.

Better get a few more practices in before NC.

[Unregistered]

Wrong. One played the entire game, the 'striker' played 3/4 and the third played ~15 min.

But yes 5-0 looks like an easy win.

We thought the U13s playing up played phenomenal. The striker is a natural and syncs well with the team. The defender is as big and talented as any of the 14s. Golden boy played well as expected. Congrats to the Revs for recognizing opportunities for players.