Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2014-2015 Boys U12 Best Teams

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    So you are a complete loser going on MA TS.
    Pretty much. However, I have a pretty level-headed view of this age group and DAP vs non-DAP. That's probably the biggest reason why I don't belong here.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Pretty much. However, I have a pretty level-headed view of this age group and DAP vs non-DAP. That's probably the biggest reason why I don't belong here.
      Nah, there are only a few Bolt dads that are silly enough to buy the pre-academy propaganda and to say so in a public forum. They stumble in here once in a while till someone posts the score of their latest catastrophe to remind them. Then they usually leave.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Nah, there are only a few Bolt dads that are silly enough to buy the pre-academy propaganda and to say so in a public forum. They stumble in here once in a while till someone posts the score of their latest catastrophe to remind them. Then they usually leave.
        I completely agree with you. ...and if I were still in MA, I would not be with them either. I would stick with NEFC, Valeo, or WUP. Trust me, they are way better than most of the DAP teams at this age group.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          0-2, -12 GD. Will update weekly on this "quality" team.
          Typical TS parent...taking pleasure at the expense
          of 12yr olds. Nice.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            I completely agree with you. ...and if I were still in MA, I would not be with them either. I would stick with NEFC, Valeo, or WUP. Trust me, they are way better than most of the DAP teams at this age group.
            Parents LOVE 'pre-academy' and DAP as buzz words. I'd rather my kid get proper training at this age and I know we are at the right club. I don't particularly like the 'Elite' name tagged on as many elite teams from other clubs are weak. My bragging rights are thus that he plays for a top 25 team in the US (depending on the week/shifting of points)

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Parents LOVE 'pre-academy' and DAP as buzz words. I'd rather my kid get proper training at this age and I know we are at the right club. I don't particularly like the 'Elite' name tagged on as many elite teams from other clubs are weak. My bragging rights are thus that he plays for a top 25 team in the US (depending on the week/shifting of points)
              Personally, I try not to brag about my children. The only people that want to hear about them are their grandparents so I let my kids tell them the news. Everyone else could care less about their accomplishments yet along their youth sports achievements.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Personally, I try not to brag about my children. The only people that want to hear about them are their grandparents so I let my kids tell them the news. Everyone else could care less about their accomplishments yet along their youth sports achievements.
                Yes. To grandparents, myself, etc. That was what I was referring to. You don't need to take every comment so literally.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Yes. To grandparents, myself, etc. That was what I was referring to. You don't need to take every comment so literally.
                  he plays for a top 25 team in the US
                  Were you talking to yourself or is grandma reading TS?

                  BTW -- the team ranking is meaningless. There are superstars on many of the top teams in MA and by 15 they merge to 3 or 4 teams. Being on a great team at 12 is not as meaningful as being one of the top players on a team even a mediocre team

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Yes. To grandparents, myself, etc. That was what I was referring to. You don't need to take every comment so literally.
                    So when you boasting here on TS, you are not actually bragging, but sharing news with your child's grandparents

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      So when you boasting here on TS, you are not actually bragging, but sharing news with your child's grandparents
                      Don't you know this is where all the grandparents hangout. :)

                      Comment


                        LOVE this thread - long time reader, first-time writer. My kids have played in MAPLE and NEP (different genders and clubs).

                        Serious question that I figure I'll get ripped for even asking, but that appears to be what this site is about for some anyway...

                        There is often reference on this site to "no wonder the Bolts wanted to merge with Valeo".

                        - Did the Bolts want to merge with Valeo, was it the other way around, or was it mutual?
                        - Since the Bolts have a DAP program, would merging with Valeo put that part of their program at risk (contractual question, not about talent)? Would they have been able to keep that program only if they "absorbed" Valeo? - What I'm asking here is, post-merger, would the club have a Bolts "brand" or Valeo "brand"?
                        - Is the Bolts DAP (and pre-DAP, whatever) the desired path that many of the Valeo parents want their kids to take anyway?

                        It sounds to me (and seriously, what do I know) like a merger would have been better for Valeo - since Bolts has all of the programs (meaning DAP) that Valeo parents want, and the player "flow" at U13/U14 and up would more likely be from Valeo to Bolts instead of the other way around (because of the DAP). So except for getting some of the players a few years early, why would Bolts want to merge with Valeo?

                        Now you can all feel free to ridicule me.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          LOVE this thread - long time reader, first-time writer. My kids have played in MAPLE and NEP (different genders and clubs).

                          Serious question that I figure I'll get ripped for even asking, but that appears to be what this site is about for some anyway...

                          There is often reference on this site to "no wonder the Bolts wanted to merge with Valeo".

                          - Did the Bolts want to merge with Valeo, was it the other way around, or was it mutual?
                          - Since the Bolts have a DAP program, would merging with Valeo put that part of their program at risk (contractual question, not about talent)? Would they have been able to keep that program only if they "absorbed" Valeo? - What I'm asking here is, post-merger, would the club have a Bolts "brand" or Valeo "brand"?
                          - Is the Bolts DAP (and pre-DAP, whatever) the desired path that many of the Valeo parents want their kids to take anyway?

                          It sounds to me (and seriously, what do I know) like a merger would have been better for Valeo - since Bolts has all of the programs (meaning DAP) that Valeo parents want, and the player "flow" at U13/U14 and up would more likely be from Valeo to Bolts instead of the other way around (because of the DAP). So except for getting some of the players a few years early, why would Bolts want to merge with Valeo?

                          Now you can all feel free to ridicule me.
                          Yes benefits for both, for Bolts:
                          1. Even with the "flow" from Valeo to Bolts, the Bolts also benefit. At the younger ages, Valeo has a lot of talent. Winning matters in DAP.

                          2. Newton Indoor. Right there, no drive to Revere for winter training.

                          Rumor that it was a done deal but Valeo wealthy benefactor blocked it.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            LOVE this thread - long time reader, first-time writer. My kids have played in MAPLE and NEP (different genders and clubs).

                            Serious question that I figure I'll get ripped for even asking, but that appears to be what this site is about for some anyway...

                            There is often reference on this site to "no wonder the Bolts wanted to merge with Valeo".

                            - Did the Bolts want to merge with Valeo, was it the other way around, or was it mutual?
                            - Since the Bolts have a DAP program, would merging with Valeo put that part of their program at risk (contractual question, not about talent)? Would they have been able to keep that program only if they "absorbed" Valeo? - What I'm asking here is, post-merger, would the club have a Bolts "brand" or Valeo "brand"?
                            - Is the Bolts DAP (and pre-DAP, whatever) the desired path that many of the Valeo parents want their kids to take anyway?

                            It sounds to me (and seriously, what do I know) like a merger would have been better for Valeo - since Bolts has all of the programs (meaning DAP) that Valeo parents want, and the player "flow" at U13/U14 and up would more likely be from Valeo to Bolts instead of the other way around (because of the DAP). So except for getting some of the players a few years early, why would Bolts want to merge with Valeo?

                            Now you can all feel free to ridicule me.
                            I might have agreed with you last year but I think in New England, DAP is not important as originally thought to be. Additionally, I think Valeo found a way around the benefits of the DAP program with EDP/NE-NPL/National tournaments

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Were you talking to yourself or is grandma reading TS?

                              BTW -- the team ranking is meaningless. There are superstars on many of the top teams in MA and by 15 they merge to 3 or 4 teams. Being on a great team at 12 is not as meaningful as being one of the top players on a team even a mediocre team
                              You are soooo wrong. If your kid is that good, get him on a good team asap. The pace of play between players has risen 10 fold since my son has joined a team with a high concentration of solid players. Good players need to learn to play with players better than they are. A high ranking team is somewhat indicative of the concentration of high level players.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                So when you boasting here on TS, you are not actually bragging, but sharing news with your child's grandparents
                                The op said 'his bragging rights' were xxxx. He didn't specify where he bragged.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X