Trump said its ok to not pay Tax's

[Unregistered]

Tell me why it is that republicans voted down Biden's $400 billion package to fund the police if it's the democrats and not the republicans that supposedly want to defund the police.

Would love to hear your rationalization.

Fox News: House Republicans Voted to Defund the Police
https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/62721

Fox News' Chris Wallace Confronts Rep. Jim Banks on GOP Vote Against More Police Funding
https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-ch...unding-1604509

It is not the federal governments job to fund police unless they are federal officers...and you link a press release from pelo**** that just quotes the question and not the response lmao...let me asking you...why is it that these jurisdictions need the money to hire the police? Will the numbers be greater than the forces were 2 years ago before these cities started defunding their police departments?...the 400 billion was a feckless dem attempt to say that it is Republicans who are trying to defund the police and everyone saw through their charade(except for you) so they have dropped it all together...just a sad attempt...you're better than that...

[Unregistered]

It is not the federal governments job to fund police unless they are federal officers...and you link a press release from pelo**** that just quotes the question and not the response lmao...let me asking you...why is it that these jurisdictions need the money to hire the police? Will the numbers be greater than the forces were 2 years ago before these cities started defunding their police departments?...the 400 billion was a feckless dem attempt to say that it is Republicans who are trying to defund the police and everyone saw through their charade(except for you) so they have dropped it all together...just a sad attempt...you're better than that...

Show me where the $400 billion was for federal law enforcement only. It's money dedicated to hiring more police officers in the states with rising crime rates. There are many reasons for the rising crime rates, including Covid.

After you're done realizing that you're wrong, explain to us why not a single republican voted for a bill to hire more cops and pay more overtime to cops. Let's can an answer, not a deflection. Why didn't a single republican vote for it?

[Unregistered]

Show me where the $400 billion was for federal law enforcement only. It's money dedicated to hiring more police officers in the states with rising crime rates. There are many reasons for the rising crime rates, including Covid.

After you're done realizing that you're wrong, explain to us why not a single republican voted for a bill to hire more cops and pay more overtime to cops. Let's can an answer, not a deflection. Why didn't a single republican vote for it?

I wonder if the con watched any of the rivoting testimony today by the DC cops who tried to protect some of the GOP members who don't care about them

[Unregistered]

Show me where the $400 billion was for federal law enforcement only. It's money dedicated to hiring more police officers in the states with rising crime rates. There are many reasons for the rising crime rates, including Covid.

After you're done realizing that you're wrong, explain to us why not a single republican voted for a bill to hire more cops and pay more overtime to cops. Let's can an answer, not a deflection. Why didn't a single republican vote for it?

your lack of comprehension skills is astounding...never said the $400 billion was going to only federal law enforcement but that the only responsibility that the federal government has is to fund them...any money from the federal government is extra for local departments...which brings us to the reason sleepy joe said they could use it for police hires and the reason you declined to answer the questions I posed...the biggest reason for the need to hire police to combat crime in these jurisdictions(no CA departments should be asking for money because gav told us crime has fallen there) is because of the defund the police movement which has caused many on the force to retire or quit leading to this great need for more police across the nation...a close second is the liberal DA's that are letting out dangerous criminals or just refusing to prosecute criminals in general...not a single Republican voted for it because of the largesse that was attached to the bill as well...come on dawg you can do better than that LOL

[Unregistered]

I wonder if the con watched any of the rivoting testimony today by the DC cops who tried to protect some of the GOP members who don't care about them

bahahaha more wild assertions with no factual basis...I did watch and I feel for those who went through it and as I have stated repeatedly here those who perpetrated violence should be prosecuted...thanks for playing *****clown

[Unregistered]

your lack of comprehension skills is astounding...never said the $400 billion was going to only federal law enforcement but that the only responsibility that the federal government has is to fund them...any money from the federal government is extra for local departments...which brings us to the reason sleepy joe said they could use it for police hires and the reason you declined to answer the questions I posed...the biggest reason for the need to hire police to combat crime in these jurisdictions(no CA departments should be asking for money because gav told us crime has fallen there) is because of the defund the police movement which has caused many on the force to retire or quit leading to this great need for more police across the nation...a close second is the liberal DA's that are letting out dangerous criminals or just refusing to prosecute criminals in general...not a single Republican voted for it because of the largesse that was attached to the bill as well...come on dawg you can do better than that LOL

If you're going to throw out claims you should be able to back them up. So back them up. Biden wanted to get money to the states because of rising crime rates. Whatever defunding data you will find doesn't approach $400 billion let alone $10 billion. But if you can show me otherwise I'll listen.

So I did answer the question. My post said that the funding was proposed because of rising crime rates due to numerous issues, many of which were caused by Covid. For instance, skyrocketing unemployment due to Trump's failure to contain it caused mostly blue collar people to lose their jobs, not to have money, have a lot of free time, and an incentive to commit crime. So again, I've answered your question.

BUT -- you FAILED to answer mine -- WHY DIDN'T A SINGLE REPUBLICAN VOTE FOR A BILL TO GET $350 BILLION (IT WAS ACTUALLY $350 AND NOT $400) TO STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT? Simple question that you have not even tried to address.

[Unregistered]

bahahaha more wild assertions with no factual basis...I did watch and I feel for those who went through it and as I have stated repeatedly here those who perpetrated violence should be prosecuted...thanks for playing *****clown

Only those who perpetrated it should be punished but not those that instigated it, actually scheduled the rally himself, got his supporters to get permits for the rally, spoke at the rally encouraging them to go fight and then had his personal attorney get up a few minutes before the march to go have trial by combat? Osama didn't fly those planes into the World Trade Center but we know he instigated it and helped organize it -- while not even an elected official of any country. But you Trumpies somehow think that Trump deserves no blame. Real patriots you are.

[Unregistered]

Only those who perpetrated it should be punished but not those that instigated it, actually scheduled the rally himself, got his supporters to get permits for the rally, spoke at the rally encouraging them to go fight and then had his personal attorney get up a few minutes before the march to go have trial by combat? Osama didn't fly those planes into the World Trade Center but we know he instigated it and helped organize it -- while not even an elected official of any country. But you Trumpies somehow think that Trump deserves no blame. Real patriots you are.

Along with possible culpability among some GOP congressional members They should be investigated as well.

Watching the grins of Trump supporters and even family members as it was unfolding demonstrated they were thrilled it was happening. That's as bad as being involved. It was a very dark day for America.

[Unregistered]

Along with possible culpability among some GOP congressional members They should be investigated as well.

Watching the grins of Trump supporters and even family members as it was unfolding demonstrated they were thrilled it was happening. That's as bad as being involved. It was a very dark day for America.

why was it dark- it was for the most part(other than an unarmed woman getting killed a bloodless demonstration- and like all demonstrations they had something to say right or wrong

and it lasted 2 hours not 180+ days

as far as accepting election results- schiff called Trump a Russian Agent so not accepting results happened long before jan 6th

we all know what happened, it was not the best use of time, but dont make it out to be more than what it actually was

[Unregistered]

why was it dark- it was for the most part(other than an unarmed woman getting killed a bloodless demonstration- and like all demonstrations they had something to say right or wrong

and it lasted 2 hours not 180+ days

as far as accepting election results- schiff called Trump a Russian Agent so not accepting results happened long before jan 6th

we all know what happened, it was not the best use of time, but dont make it out to be more than what it actually was

Well, turns out Schiff and all our intel agencies were correct on Trump being a Russian tool, even if he was too dumb to realize he was being used. Even Russia now admits it.
Schiff didn't call the election fraudulent - he said Russia interfered, which, again, they did. He didn't rally the troops, tell them to march on the capitol,"fight like hell"

[Unregistered]

why was it dark- it was for the most part(other than an unarmed woman getting killed a bloodless demonstration- and like all demonstrations they had something to say right or wrong

and it lasted 2 hours not 180+ days

as far as accepting election results- schiff called Trump a Russian Agent so not accepting results happened long before jan 6th

we all know what happened, it was not the best use of time, but dont make it out to be more than what it actually was

Storming the capitol, trying to overturn a free and fair election, calling for the speaker and VP to be hung. Oh yeah, a normal day in America.

[Unregistered]

Storming the capitol, trying to overturn a free and fair election, calling for the speaker and VP to be hung. Oh yeah, a normal day in America.

pretty much so- since 1968 when it was done by your side

[Unregistered]

pretty much so- since 1968 when it was done by your side

Care to try again con? Only two small incidents in the last several decades at the building


"1814 was the last time the U.S. Capitol fell to such a large-scale insurrection as what occurred on Wednesday.

According to the U.S. House online archive, there was an attack by four people of the Puerto Rican Nationalist party in 1954. At the time, U.S. Capitol security was more lax and the four individuals were able to walk into the visitor’s gallery overlooking the chamber with their handguns. They opened fire and wounded five members of Congress. No one was killed.

In a 1998 attack, an armed assailant stormed past a Capitol security checkpoint and killed one Capitol police officer. He then exchanged gunfire with a Capitol detective protecting a Congressperson and fatally wounded the detective. The exchange allowed other officers to subdue the assailant"

https://www.abc10.com/article/news/v...9-0ed7fb86fbbf

[Unregistered]

Care to try again con? Only two small incidents in the last several decades at the building


"1814 was the last time the U.S. Capitol fell to such a large-scale insurrection as what occurred on Wednesday.

According to the U.S. House online archive, there was an attack by four people of the Puerto Rican Nationalist party in 1954. At the time, U.S. Capitol security was more lax and the four individuals were able to walk into the visitor’s gallery overlooking the chamber with their handguns. They opened fire and wounded five members of Congress. No one was killed.

In a 1998 attack, an armed assailant stormed past a Capitol security checkpoint and killed one Capitol police officer. He then exchanged gunfire with a Capitol detective protecting a Congressperson and fatally wounded the detective. The exchange allowed other officers to subdue the assailant"

https://www.abc10.com/article/news/v...9-0ed7fb86fbbf

only people in the capital on jan 6th were the capital police
the Capital didnt fall

these hearings arent about finding the truth- everyone knows what the truth is
the government is too big too intrusive and too corrupt
just listen to your side when you arent in power- same bitching

everything done by the party in power is now done for political reasons-not the good of the country, so half of the people are pissed all of the time

these hearings are no different-political theatre for your amusement-thats it

[Unregistered]

only people in the capital on jan 6th were the capital police
the Capital didnt fall

these hearings arent about finding the truth- everyone knows what the truth is
the government is too big too intrusive and too corrupt
just listen to your side when you arent in power- same bitching

everything done by the party in power is now done for political reasons-not the good of the country, so half of the people are pissed all of the time

these hearings are no different-political theatre for your amusement-thats it

They also serve to put it in front of the public and put it on the public record.
Republicans are afraid of exposure. Why is that? Because they have something to hide.

If you're innocent why would you take the 5th? - DJ Trump