Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Merry Christmas from Donald Trump
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI’m amazed at how dumb some people are in the face of reality. NOT ONE of the alleged witnesses backs up Ford’s story. NOT ONE. Her therapist’s notes are different than her claim but the therapist must have taken down the notes incorrectly. I’m a victim but I need a stableful of lawyers to protect me from purgery and false claim allegations. Which, by the way, is a felony.
Why do you think she made a claim that can’t be proven or disproven? Could it be bc she knows the mere appearance of impropriety might be enough to block the confirmation, while making certain no one could charge her with a crime. She’s walking the tightrope right now between trying to block the nom and not ending up in jail. I’m guessing she calls the GOP some names and doesn’t testify under some absurd claims of unfairness and safety. You’ll see.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI’m amazed at how dumb some people are in the face of reality. NOT ONE of the alleged witnesses backs up Ford’s story. NOT ONE. Her therapist’s notes are different than her claim but the therapist must have taken down the notes incorrectly. I’m a victim but I need a stableful of lawyers to protect me from purgery and false claim allegations. Which, by the way, is a felony.
Why do you think she made a claim that can’t be proven or disproven? Could it be bc she knows the mere appearance of impropriety might be enough to block the confirmation, while making certain no one could charge her with a crime. She’s walking the tightrope right now between trying to block the nom and not ending up in jail. I’m guessing she calls the GOP some names and doesn’t testify under some absurd claims of unfairness and safety. You’ll see.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThus far it looks like there will be no witnesses called, no investigation. It will come down to who is credible in he said v she said. No matter how it comes out neither side will be satisfied and doubts will always remain.
Trump will have his second Supreme Court justice
Another L for the democrats.
Here is the score card.....
Obama legacy erased...check
Hillary defeated....check
Reshape the judicial branch...check....2 young Conservative Supreme Court appointments and 67 others so far...another 73 teed up
Democrats....tbd....hoping to get some wins in congress...
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAnd you forgot
Trump will have his second Supreme Court justice
Another L for the democrats.
Here is the score card.....
Obama legacy erased...check
Hillary defeated....check
Reshape the judicial branch...check....2 young Conservative Supreme Court appointments and 67 others so far...another 73 teed up
Democrats....tbd....hoping to get some wins in congress...
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou still have a very small dikk. Hurray!
1. Trump will get us into the war to end all wars with North Korea. There will be nuclear disaster
2. Paris climate accord.....us will face backlash from Europe
3. Iranian nuke deal pull out. Will cause War with Iran
4 tarriffs will hurt us economy and pulling out of the trans pacific treaty will cause China to become more powerful in the region
5. The dreamers need a solution or our economy will suffer and it will cause a humanitarian crisis
Flavors of the week for democrats. You think they care about any of that stuff now?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Game over, hahahahahahaha. LOSING!!!!!
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postof course they are because contrary to anyone who ever met this guy he lived a double life,like Superman
mild manner lawyer judge nerd during the day, at night a super villain
too funny
this BS is coming apart at the seams- under threat of perjury a lot of stories change- im surprised that "no Oath" wasnt one of her conditions
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Haha "this is over" haha
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post4th alleged witness has come forward to say that she does not recall any such party and does not know Kavanaugh. I expect Dr. Ford to not show for testimony. This is over. And the Dems will be the ones paying the price on Nov 6 for this charade they introduced. It’s one thing to in-line the reputation of the President, who clearly deserves it. It’s another to do it to a person with an impeccable reputation. Good night to the DNC. It’s all over but the crying now. And it’s well deserved. Say goodnight, Gracie. Goodnight Gracie.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
The hits just keep coming.......
"We are aware of significant evidence of multiple house parties in the Washington, D.C. area during the early 1980s during which Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, and others would participate in the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs in order to allow a ‘train’ of men to subsequently gang rape them. There are multiple witnesses that will corroborate these facts and each of them must be called to testify publicly.”
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post"We are aware of significant evidence of multiple house parties in the Washington, D.C. area during the early 1980s during which Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, and others would participate in the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs in order to allow a ‘train’ of men to subsequently gang rape them. There are multiple witnesses that will corroborate these facts and each of them must be called to testify publicly.”
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThis is why the FBI needs to investigate. There are so many stories about "evidence" on either side which is being verified by who? The Senate won't let any other witnesses testify. For Anita Hill there was an investigation and both she and Clarence thomas had witnesses. This is what I don't understand - if the GOP can prove both women are lying it's a big win for them. By not having a credible investigation it only looks like they've something to hide and that's not a good look.
Their Decency & Honesty has slowly crumbled away.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI agree but to some or all of the Republican supporters they want to win at all costs and by any means necessary.
Their Decency & Honesty has slowly crumbled away.
These are now the consequences of allowing mob rule over due process. What is to be said of the 6 " background investigations " by the FBI ? They didn't uncover any of this. The top shelf of investigative ability came up empty. But now, at the 11th hour they surface ?
Let's not get confused and lump everything together. To be clear, I believe the women accusers. That's only as far as what I have read and been told. But they are still allegations without proof. The proof comes from our Judicial System, not the Press or a Legislative body following a Constitutional process. Based on information regarding the definitive plan to disrupt and delay the confirmation , which goes beyond the only Constitutional mandate of " advice and consent " , these accusations become suspect.
Absolute Proof of the allegations are what is necessary, and not to have the Proof be determined by the SCOTUS candidate defending himself. If that is to be the case , it needs to be done in a Court of Law. Not by the Press, Activists and members of both parties in the Senate.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDecency and Honesty has slowly crumbles away for Democrats now that they have been high jacked by the Left.
These are now the consequences of allowing mob rule over due process. What is to be said of the 6 " background investigations " by the FBI ? They didn't uncover any of this. The top shelf of investigative ability came up empty. But now, at the 11th hour they surface ?
Let's not get confused and lump everything together. To be clear, I believe the women accusers. That's only as far as what I have read and been told. But they are still allegations without proof. The proof comes from our Judicial System, not the Press or a Legislative body following a Constitutional process. Based on information regarding the definitive plan to disrupt and delay the confirmation , which goes beyond the only Constitutional mandate of " advice and consent " , these accusations become suspect.
Absolute Proof of the allegations are what is necessary, and not to have the Proof be determined by the SCOTUS candidate defending himself. If that is to be the case , it needs to be done in a Court of Law. Not by the Press, Activists and members of both parties in the Senate.
You want it both ways. Right??
- Quote
Comment
Comment