Trump blames parkland massacre on shooter’s “neighbors and classmates”

[Unregistered]

Not me - a liberal publication (BuzzFeed):
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed/

Your own side admits it.

Your main defect is cognitive dissonance. Any conclusion you dont like, you trope out the most common tactic in the liberal playbook - going back over a century the most common - you shoot the messenger. Thats all you got. Even when its a liberal messenger.

In this case, liberal social scientists, many of whom are sick in the head themselves, are not going to study the problem and highlight their own party and individual defects. Conclusions from data by omission of data is unscientific. We have the data that exists, notwithstanding political resistance to collecting it from some corners, so we use that to form a hypothesis. The results from surveys by liberal publications point very squarely to the fact that you guys are sick in the head.

There you go again, Mr. Strawman. I didn't criticize Buzzfeed, I criticized SurveyMonkey. Please explain how conclusions from an online survey in which the respondents were self-selected proves anything.

[Unregistered]

Your supposed "peer reviewed" sources were all debunked. But in your Gish Gallop of misinformation, I might have missed one. So kindly remind us of the one you think is best. The actual link, please. I'll wait.

There has been 65 million years of global cooling to this point in time:
J. Zachos, et al (2001) – Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate 65 Ma to Present, Science 292 (5517), 686–693

The last 5 million years has seen extensive cooling with vastly higher temperatures than today;
L. E. Lisiecki and M. E. Raymo (2005) – A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records, Paleoceanography 20, 1003

GPS2 ice core data from NOAA shows the cooling trend over the past 1,000 to 3,000 years in 10-60 year increments:
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-acces...imatology-data

This data shows that we have been experiencing declining temperatures for the past 3,000 years. Greenland is now colder than for most of the past 10,000 years. Temperatures are only considered to be increasing if viewed for the last 150 years, from 1850 onward, which is roughly when thermometers began collecting global data, and is also the period of time the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has chosen for its review.

[Unregistered]

There has been 65 million years of global cooling to this point in time:
J. Zachos, et al (2001) – Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate 65 Ma to Present, Science 292 (5517), 686–693

The last 5 million years has seen extensive cooling with vastly higher temperatures than today;
L. E. Lisiecki and M. E. Raymo (2005) – A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records, Paleoceanography 20, 1003

GPS2 ice core data from NOAA shows the cooling trend over the past 1,000 to 3,000 years in 10-60 year increments:
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-acces...imatology-data

This data shows that we have been experiencing declining temperatures for the past 3,000 years. Greenland is now colder than for most of the past 10,000 years. Temperatures are only considered to be increasing if viewed for the last 150 years, from 1850 onward, which is roughly when thermometers began collecting global data, and is also the period of time the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has chosen for its review.

First two papers show cooling over the past 65 million years, past 5 million years, and the last one for the past couple thousand years. The only "warming" is since 1850 when they started using mercury thermometers.

[Unregistered]

you are not fooling anyone. Liberals are well known to creep on issues like abortion drug legalization and gun control by starting with small steps leading to larger ones.

The problem is genetically defective psychopaths, of whom most are on your side. You know - the irrational, pathologically self absorbed, sometimes outright psychotic.

If he didnt have an ar15 he would have walked in with bombs, or a machete, and the death toll would have been the same. We need to regulate libtards not guns. Guns protect us from libtards as they creep from socialism to communism to authoritarianism dictatorship.

agree 100% trump is and will be the greatest president to run this country. Democrats have fallen into hell with satan in their thoughts about everything. Because of their small minded thinking.
The gun did not kill those kids the person behind the trigger did. Libby stop blaming guns blame the killer.

[Unregistered]

There you go again, Mr. Strawman. I didn't criticize Buzzfeed, I criticized SurveyMonkey. Please explain how conclusions from an online survey in which the respondents were self-selected proves anything.

If it were bunk data, why would a liberal magazine like Buzzfeed publish it?
SurveyMonkey was founded by liberals.
They show the typical liberal line with their various surveys on Trump
https://www.surveymonkey.com/curiosi...ates-approval/

They are part of the liberal machine.

Virtually every single poll that drives your sides policy choices is based on surveys from groups like SurveyMonkey - digital (and phone) surveys - you know, the ones that tell you today that Democrats are going to retake the house, and that Trump's approval ratings are so low. You seem to have no trouble accepting digital surveys there...

What you do is squirm and contort to try and get out of data that doesnt support your cult position on liberalism but you are not fooling anyone. Liberals here are telling you that you guys are sick in the head, and you still wont believe it. Would you believe it more if it were conservatives that say it? OK then here it is from me: you guys are sick in the head.

[Unregistered]

gun violence is on the decline but we have more guns. Take away the gun argument has been thoroughly disproven.

Remember the Gun Violence stats include suicides

But it is the guns.

Northwestern study since 1980 there has been 15-20 mass shootings in the USA each year.

What has changed we now live in a 24hr news cycle.

The first step is the media should not rush to social media to post the shooter's social media, pictures, and background information.

The media is giving the shooter the infamy they want. It might seem trivial but if not making the shooter infamous prevents one mass shooting it is worth it.

Anderson Cooper said last year he would not mention the shooter's name. That is a win for AC.

[Unregistered]

Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic:

https://nypost.com/2016/06/09/scienc...chotic-traits/
with the academic publication correction referenced by this news story found here:
https://ajps.org/

Go ahead and dismiss because NY Post is not uber-liberal. But you have to dismiss the American Journal of Political Science too.

Notice how the "error" was reported widely by the liberal media but the correction not so much - this is another classic propaganda tactic of the Marxist left - you people are so dark and disturbed you dont seem to understand that if you have to lie cheat and steal to attain something, maybe that something is not worth the effort.

[Unregistered]

Here is a book I recommend for you:

The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness Paperback – October 21, 2011

https://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Mind-.../dp/0977956318

[Unregistered]

Tax supported youth programs like soccer could help save us.

[Unregistered]

Tax supported youth programs like soccer could help save us.

Agree - the entire concept of sport is to tame the reptilian, animal tendency we have to murder each other. That is also supposed to be the idea behind democratic politics (as opposed to authoritarian or aristocratic governance)

[Unregistered]

You are not fooling anyone. Liberals are well known to creep on issues like abortion drug legalization and gun control by starting with small steps leading to larger ones.

The problem is genetically defective psychopaths, of whom most are on your side. You know - the irrational, pathologically self absorbed, sometimes outright psychotic.

If he didnt have an AR15 he would have walked in with bombs, or a machete, and the death toll would have been the same. We need to regulate Libtards not guns. Guns protect us from Libtards as they creep from Socialism to Communism to Authoritarianism Dictatorship.

I am fully aware that all politicians of all stripes like to take small steps to achieve larger objectives. If you believe in an ideology then you think like this. On the right or the left.

But I am more of a pragmatist. I think what’s needed is a combination of mental health services specifically geared to troubled young men and common sense background checks. Not outlawing guns even AR-15 because like I said there are millions of responsible gun owners. I think coalescing around a middle ground like I suggested would be a great start. That’s how politics used to work until the ideologues like you took things over.

[Unregistered]

Totally the FBI & Democrats fault,.They waste so much of the FBI's time trying to find dirt on our President that doesn't exist they don't have time for real threats like the shooter posted on Social media.

Well said ,.Russia investigation a example .

[Unregistered]

Full disclosure, I'm a hard-core conservative. I voted for Trump, I believe in hard work, personal freedom and holding people responsible for their actions. I have no desire to hunt, but I wouldn't deny anyone the right to do so if they enjoy that and do it responsibly.

So with that said, can any of you gun rights advocates explain to me why in the world anyone needs a semi-automatic assault weapon with a magazine (regardless of capacity)? I mean you wouldn't hunt with one, right? And you wouldn't open up with one on a home intruder, would you? Wouldn't you go for the handgun first in close quarters? So why in the world is anyone defending the need to sell or own these things? They have only one purpose, and that is multiple casualties. Why are they legal?

[Unregistered]

I am fully aware that all politicians of all stripes like to take small steps to achieve larger objectives. If you believe in an ideology then you think like this. On the right or the left.

But I am more of a pragmatist. I think what’s needed is a combination of mental health services specifically geared to troubled young men and common sense background checks. Not outlawing guns even AR-15 because like I said there are millions of responsible gun owners. I think coalescing around a middle ground like I suggested would be a great start. That’s how politics used to work until the ideologues like you took things over.

Well I agree with that. 19 year olds with a history of animal mutilation and other behavioral red flags should not be able to buy an AR15, among many other things like nitrate fertilizers, machetes, chainsaws etc., and should not have access to school grounds they have been expelled from.

[Unregistered]

Well I agree with that. 19 year olds with a history of animal mutilation and other behavioral red flags should not be able to buy an AR15, among many other things like nitrate fertilizers, machetes, chainsaws etc., and should not have access to school grounds they have been expelled from.

Raise the gun buying age to the 21 drinking age and sell no Automatic riffles to anyone.