Our team is gong to get even better - bringing "up" a few current u15s who are 2000s who are quite good. 99s are all landing on their feet. But it will make a mess with recruiting. My kid falls into the right graduation group but those younger 2000s might have a more complicated process.
Our team is gong to get even better - bringing "up" a few current u15s who are 2000s who are quite good. 99s are all landing on their feet. But it will make a mess with recruiting. My kid falls into the right graduation group but those younger 2000s might have a more complicated process.
U17 is current the focus group for college coaches. Maybe that will change with the age group changes but feel sorry for the young 99s who are jumping from U16 (not watched by college coaches) to U18 (an age group not watched by top college coaches)
With the birth year change happening this coming year I would think that the coaches are in the know about the 99's situation. Don't be so foolish. Oh and by the way there isn't too many kids in mass playing non academy that are going to TOP COLLEGES
With the birth year change happening this coming year I would think that the coaches are in the know about the 99's situation. Don't be so foolish. Oh and by the way there isn't too many kids in mass playing non academy that are going to TOP COLLEGES
Don't know why you referenced non DA kids as that has nothing to do with the discussion. But any who...next year's juniors who are pushed onto primarily senior teams are in a tough spot. Many senior teams fall apart because by that age unless you're going to play in college you likely will stop playing spring of senior year = fewer teams for juniors to play on, fewer showcases played as most teammates will have been been recruited if they are going to play in college
Comment