Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Scores of this weekends CFC vs OW?
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631305]Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou U12 parents realize you should keep quiet about scrimmage results from the big 3 in CT. This why they don't play each other that often, just a hassle for owners/coaches b/c parents report results. Just enjoy playing a good game in your own state, getting touches in the winter and enjoy the game.[/QUOTE
I give them credit for actually organizing and playing the games. Good for everyone involved.
Owners don't get too bent over this stuff. Reality is that kids that play in the southern branches for CFC (Arsenal) aren't candidates for OW and vice versa. Too far.
Nice that CFC beat OW on the boards though.
OW 2007 lost a close game to CFC Arsenal 2007, despite the fact that the three best OW 2007s play up on the OW 2006 DA team and were not there.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631339]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Points of clarification - CFC Arsenal 2007 lost to OW 2006 NPL....the score was 7-4.
OW 2007 lost a close game to CFC Arsenal 2007, despite the fact that the three best OW 2007s play up on the OW 2006 DA team and were not there.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631344]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Don't forget two OW players were playing up at the prom and another two were at the dentists.
Power Ranking (2005, 2006, 2007):
1. OW
2. FSA
3. CFC
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631352]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Joke all you want....but the fact is that OW is stronger at 2007, 2006 and 2005 levels. The future is bright....
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631352]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Joke all you want....but the fact is that OW is stronger at 2007, 2006 and 2005 levels. The future is bright.
Power Ranking (2005, 2006, 2007):
1. OW
2. FSA
3. CFC
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631358]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
They just lost to CFC didn’t they? A branch team no less. When CFC combines in a couple of years, they’ll leave OW in the rear view mirror even further. As usual.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631358]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
They just lost to CFC didn’t they? A branch team no less. When CFC combines in a couple of years, they’ll leave OW in the rear view mirror even further. As usual.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631352]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Joke all you want....but the fact is that OW is stronger at 2007, 2006 and 2005 levels. The future is bright.
Power Ranking (2005, 2006, 2007):
1. OW
2. FSA
3. CFC
Chat up the u18 parents at OW, they had some special too. Lots of those kids drummed out or no longer play
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631399]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
You are following in the footsteps of many delusional parents that think they have something special. Oakwood gets kids from Glastonbury, Tolland and Hartford area. CFC draws from the lower 2/3 of the state. It’s a numbers game and it plays out the exact same way every year.
Chat up the u18 parents at OW, they had some special too. Lots of those kids drummed out or no longer play
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631399]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
You are following in the footsteps of many delusional parents that think they have something special. Oakwood gets kids from Glastonbury, Tolland and Hartford area. CFC draws from the lower 2/3 of the state. It’s a numbers game and it plays out the exact same way every year.
Chat up the u18 parents at OW, they had some special too. Lots of those kids drummed out or no longer play
CFC and OW, along with FSA are solid. There are good players and good coaches at all three. Same with bad players and bad coaches. If you focus on getting better individually, and use the structure that each provides, all three can meet or exceed expectations. Team and game comparisons at this age group and in this setting is insane.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631401]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
I am comparing the 2005, 2006, and 2007 teams at the big 3. I never said anything about anyone being special. CFC not attracting kids anymore at the younger ages and it is starting to show in the results.....
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
CFC United motto:
Lather, Rinse, REPEAT.......Can everyone say it together? Its just the way the machine is oiled!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631408]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
What results? For U13? None of it matters until U15+ when teams are solidified and there's minimal movement.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2631421]Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
So in your mind results do not matter at U13, U14 and U15......so that leaves U16 and U17 as the only years for comparison (you would probably also say that U18 doesn't matter because those kids are recruited already). Thanks for synthesizing it for us. From now on we can only comment on U16 and U17 ages....happy now?
Not the poster
- Quote
Comment
Comment