Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
1. Having good data all around about teams level,
2. Standings are fun (my kids have always wanted to know where they were in the standings whether it was outdoor or futsal) and other sports offer it at younger ages than local soccer does.
3. Areas that produce more top level players don't seem to have any problem keep tracking of scores/standings at ages younger than us. I disagree with designing our system around what is best for finding and developing the top .1%, but if you care about developing that top .1%, taking away competitive elements used elsewhere in the world would seem to be a mistake.
4. This state/fed should never, ever rollout another mass mandate that doesn't have widespread support or has been tested extensively on a small scale.
Comment