Originally posted by Guest
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Girls 2007 Thread
Collapse
X
-
Guest
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Ok maybe SSS is but in general the leagues are pretty similar. Once you're in this youth soccer racquet it's bend over "thank you sir may I have another "
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
I’ll happily pay more for the better coach not the better patch. I’ve been watching the coaches. GA coaches seem very good.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
SSS would be near the top of northeast ECNL standings? You have no idea what you are talking about. This is a 2007 thread and the 07 Select team would be the last or second to last place team in the conference.
As the kids get older, the ECNL teams are simply stronger from top to bottom and the competition week to week is more consistent because of it. NEFC and SSS will just keep beating up on the teams in their conference and then travel to Champions Cup 3 times a year to lose to mediocre teams there.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Not 07 but in 08 SSS and Scorpions are fairly close - within a goal each time they play. SSS is 2nd in a conference of 9 GA teams - three of who are terrible and automatic wins. Scorpions are 6th in their conference of 9 teams and there's not a gimme in the bunch.
As the kids get older, the ECNL teams are simply stronger from top to bottom and the competition week to week is more consistent because of it. NEFC and SSS will just keep beating up on the teams in their conference and then travel to Champions Cup 3 times a year to lose to mediocre teams there.
True that as they get older the ECNL teams get stronger but MA based ECNL teams keep getting spanked whenever they leave the borders of New England so congrats on being top of the ECNL rubbish pile.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
If Scorpions don't have a gimme in the ECNL NE Conference I wouldn't brag about that because it's not an indicator of the strength of the conference. Even die-hard ECNL wonks know there are a couple of weak clubs.
True that as they get older the ECNL teams get stronger but MA based ECNL teams keep getting spanked whenever they leave the borders of New England so congrats on being top of the ECNL rubbish pile.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
If Scorpions don't have a gimme in the ECNL NE Conference I wouldn't brag about that because it's not an indicator of the strength of the conference. Even die-hard ECNL wonks know there are a couple of weak clubs.
True that as they get older the ECNL teams get stronger but MA based ECNL teams keep getting spanked whenever they leave the borders of New England so congrats on being top of the ECNL rubbish pile.
this proved SSS had quality. The poster pointed out that Scorps is at or near the bottom of their division, indicating that Scorps lacks quality. Since SSS plays tight games with Scorps, that would indicate SSS, also lacks quality and would be at or near the bottom of ECNL in NE. To take it further, this means that the top of GA is on par with the bottom of ECNL at this age group in NE.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View PostIf Scorpions don't have a gimme in the ECNL NE Conference I wouldn't brag about that because it's not an indicator of the strength of the conference. Even die-hard ECNL wonks know there are a couple of weak clubs.
True that as they get older the ECNL teams get stronger but MA based ECNL teams keep getting spanked whenever they leave the borders of New England so congrats on being top of the ECNL rubbish pile.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
I think the posters point was this: you (or someone else) bragged that SSS played tight games with Scorps and stated
this proved SSS had quality. The poster pointed out that Scorps is at or near the bottom of their division, indicating that Scorps lacks quality. Since SSS plays tight games with Scorps, that would indicate SSS, also lacks quality and would be at or near the bottom of ECNL in NE. To take it further, this means that the top of GA is on par with the bottom of ECNL at this age group in NE.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
I think the posters point was this: you (or someone else) bragged that SSS played tight games with Scorps and stated
this proved SSS had quality. The poster pointed out that Scorps is at or near the bottom of their division, indicating that Scorps lacks quality. Since SSS plays tight games with Scorps, that would indicate SSS, also lacks quality and would be at or near the bottom of ECNL in NE. To take it further, this means that the top of GA is on par with the bottom of ECNL at this age group in NE.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View PostI know we talk about it a lot here, but does anyone care and does it matter if New England teams can compete nationally? If it's all about the spot on a college team, there are some kids doing alright there.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Comparing GA to ECNL is like comparing McDonalds to Burger King. Same product in different packaging. Some prefer Big Macs others Whoppers. Some states have more McDonald’s and some more BKs, but same same.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View PostComparing GA to ECNL is like comparing McDonalds to Burger King. Same product in different packaging. Some prefer Big Macs others Whoppers. Some states have more McDonald’s and some more BKs, but same same.
- Quote
Comment
Comment