Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

#1 Reason CFC sucks

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #1 Reason CFC sucks

    Men who use young women as pawns in their own power games. Ladies` if you want to continue letting men decide your futures keep playing by their rules and keep letting your daddy go on here stalking your teammates and friends and sabotaging your hard work.

    #2
    JFC. Give it a rest.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      JFC. Give it a rest.
      it's getting weird, that's for sure

      i'm guessing a 2003 parent. lot's of disappointed parents and kids on that team

      Comment


        #4
        No lights

        Comment


          #5
          Lots of fighting at CFC. That’s what happens when there’s no lights.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Lots of fighting at CFC. That’s what happens when there’s no lights.
            And lots of commits...

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              And lots of commits...
              yes parent commits to pay coaches to get their kid in college

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Men who use young women as pawns in their own power games. Ladies` if you want to continue letting men decide your futures keep playing by their rules and keep letting your daddy go on here stalking your teammates and friends and sabotaging your hard work.
                Mid-week bender?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  yes parent commits to pay coaches to get their kid in college
                  The number of commits doesn't lie. You can try to justify the CFC hate, but facts are facts.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    It’s just the same Oakwood parent. Every time Oakwood is discussed; these unintelligible threads pop up. Very transparent.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      The number of commits doesn't lie. You can try to justify the CFC hate, but facts are facts.
                      i agree its all about the numbers
                      CFC is the biggest club in the state
                      u-12 they have 6+ teams of kids at an age group (way over 100 kids)
                      they whittle down to around 60-80 kids through HS at an age group
                      now how many on your commit list?
                      compare the % to other clubs- they do less with more than any other club
                      yes they get the lions share of the states top players- but realistically those kids could play anywhere and get offers- how do the next group of kids who arent stars fare?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        i agree its all about the numbers
                        CFC is the biggest club in the state
                        u-12 they have 6+ teams of kids at an age group (way over 100 kids)
                        they whittle down to around 60-80 kids through HS at an age group
                        now how many on your commit list?
                        compare the % to other clubs- they do less with more than any other club
                        yes they get the lions share of the states top players- but realistically those kids could play anywhere and get offers- how do the next group of kids who arent stars fare?
                        CFC is the biggest. Why? Because it's known that the best players play there and the teams get the best college exposure from D1 schools. If the club performance on the field sucked and all their commits were to lower level schools, CFC wouldn't be the biggest club.

                        Not true about playing anywhere. It's a proven fact that ECNL gets them the best exposure. And being on a good ECNL team helps even more. Which club has historically had the better ECNL teams?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          i agree its all about the numbers
                          CFC is the biggest club in the state
                          u-12 they have 6+ teams of kids at an age group (way over 100 kids)
                          they whittle down to around 60-80 kids through HS at an age group
                          now how many on your commit list?
                          compare the % to other clubs- they do less with more than any other club
                          yes they get the lions share of the states top players- but realistically those kids could play anywhere and get offers- how do the next group of kids who arent stars fare?
                          Do you really believe the kids can play anywhere and get offers?

                          Offers, yes but at Hartford, New Haven etc.

                          CFC (United in particular) has success because they aggregate the majority (not all) the talent at U15 and up. They offer access to a platform in the ECNL that is the undisputed one stop shopping spot for college coaches.

                          Sure, we get a handful of stars every year in CT. Those kids would get recruited by playing on a halfway decent club team that could at least access the Jefferson Cup and those type events.

                          If you look at the last few years at CFC it shows how the platform works. CFC has 19 D1 commits from the ECNL team. Also had a few top D3 that could have gone D1. Outside of the top few kids, the rest of the players would be Top 5 on any other club team in CT. By being part of that platform they played against top teams with rosters full of college bound players at all of the big events. For college coaches that's what simulates how a play will handle the college game. Ringing the bell the 4 times in a U17 game against SCP, Ginga etc means nothing. How's your first touch with a 5'9 defender committed to UCLA coming at you full speed? That's why the next group of players gets recruited. Show a coach that you can hang at that level and speed of play and applies very well to the college game. Look at the rosters at even most mid major D1 programs and see where they are recruiting from, it gives your answer.

                          As far as CFC at the young ages, it's big and inconsistent. Arsenal and North do a good job. Sound does too but competes with talent in a saturated market. Having a big funnel is that feeds the United machine.

                          Bottom line is that there's nothing close when college is the end game.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Do you really believe the kids can play anywhere and get offers?

                            Offers, yes but at Hartford, New Haven etc.

                            CFC (United in particular) has success because they aggregate the majority (not all) the talent at U15 and up. They offer access to a platform in the ECNL that is the undisputed one stop shopping spot for college coaches.

                            Sure, we get a handful of stars every year in CT. Those kids would get recruited by playing on a halfway decent club team that could at least access the Jefferson Cup and those type events.

                            If you look at the last few years at CFC it shows how the platform works. CFC has 19 D1 commits from the ECNL team. Also had a few top D3 that could have gone D1. Outside of the top few kids, the rest of the players would be Top 5 on any other club team in CT. By being part of that platform they played against top teams with rosters full of college bound players at all of the big events. For college coaches that's what simulates how a play will handle the college game. Ringing the bell the 4 times in a U17 game against SCP, Ginga etc means nothing. How's your first touch with a 5'9 defender committed to UCLA coming at you full speed? That's why the next group of players gets recruited. Show a coach that you can hang at that level and speed of play and applies very well to the college game. Look at the rosters at even most mid major D1 programs and see where they are recruiting from, it gives your answer.

                            As far as CFC at the young ages, it's big and inconsistent. Arsenal and North do a good job. Sound does too but competes with talent in a saturated market. Having a big funnel is that feeds the United machine.

                            Bottom line is that there's nothing close when college is the end game.
                            well, I don't want my kid playing around that CFC cesspool. 3 players a year go big time soccer. Most others pay full freight everywhere they go, even if committed. You can have your cesspool

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              well, I don't want my kid playing around that CFC cesspool. 3 players a year go big time soccer. Most others pay full freight everywhere they go, even if committed. You can have your cesspool
                              Very misguided and ignorant statement

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X