It used to be easily confirmable by just looking at both rosters and seeing which were on both, of which 9 were and are in all the pictures, but ECNL decided to take all the standings and rosters down. But it is unbelievable what they have done and the ENPL system needs to be changed ASAP so this will never happen again!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PDA Win ENPL Final's with 9 DA Players!
Collapse
X
-
UnregisteredTags: None
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt used to be easily confirmable by just looking at both rosters and seeing which were on both, of which 9 were and are in all the pictures, but ECNL decided to take all the standings and rosters down. But it is unbelievable what they have done and the ENPL system needs to be changed ASAP so this will never happen again!
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt used to be easily confirmable by just looking at both rosters and seeing which were on both, of which 9 were and are in all the pictures, but ECNL decided to take all the standings and rosters down. But it is unbelievable what they have done and the ENPL system needs to be changed ASAP so this will never happen again!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
I’m REALLY going to enjoy this!
So, the OP (who I would bet $10k is from FESA) is talking about the U16 (03) boys age group. Where the PDA ECNL team just dominated the competition to win “Nationals”:
https://www.elitenationalpremierleag...ow/5047858-16u
Here’s what’s funny about this....he’s right....to some extent. The DA does not have a U16 (03 this past year) age division, they have a U16/17 (03/02) age division. Therefore, a good number of DA players from last year’s (2017/2018) U15 would not have made a team that also has too 02’s. So, they play ECNL. Yes, you guys played some kids that were previously DA, and may be again next year when the 03’s and 04’s combine to make the U16/17 age group.
Now, what REALLY cracks me up is that PDA’s BEST 03’s played DA this year, not ECNL. In fact, the 10 best 2003’s played DA for PDA:
http://plda.ussoccerda.com/sam/teams...p?team=7404816
But hey, if you listen to FESA, DA is garbage! LMFAO!!!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo, the OP (who I would bet $10k is from FESA) is talking about the U16 (03) boys age group. Where the PDA ECNL team just dominated the competition to win “Nationals”:
https://www.elitenationalpremierleag...ow/5047858-16u
Here’s what’s funny about this....he’s right....to some extent. The DA does not have a U16 (03 this past year) age division, they have a U16/17 (03/02) age division. Therefore, a good number of DA players from last year’s (2017/2018) U15 would not have made a team that also has too 02’s. So, they play ECNL. Yes, you guys played some kids that were previously DA, and may be again next year when the 03’s and 04’s combine to make the U16/17 age group.
Now, what REALLY cracks me up is that PDA’s BEST 03’s played DA this year, not ECNL. In fact, the 10 best 2003’s played DA for PDA:
http://plda.ussoccerda.com/sam/teams...p?team=7404816
But hey, if you listen to FESA, DA is garbage! LMFAO!!!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWe are not from FESA, but we are from Kraze. I think it is just complete bulls#it that these teams work so hard to go to ENPL finals and then just get smacked by DA.
just as a heads up FKK doesn't ever call themselves "kraze"...
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postnice try...OP is from Fl Elite as they are the one who got smacked by PDA... but they also couldn't beat the other 2 teams they played so... if you think rosters didn't have to be submitted in advance as well as game cards you are an idiot.. also, there were quite a few teams in Illinois as well as Colorado that had duel rostered/DP's as well as players coming on board for the next season playing due to players not being available due to summer vacation.
just as a heads up FKK doesn't ever call themselves "kraze"...
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo, the OP (who I would bet $10k is from FESA) is talking about the U16 (03) boys age group. Where the PDA ECNL team just dominated the competition to win “Nationals”:
https://www.elitenationalpremierleag...ow/5047858-16u
Here’s what’s funny about this....he’s right....to some extent. The DA does not have a U16 (03 this past year) age division, they have a U16/17 (03/02) age division. Therefore, a good number of DA players from last year’s (2017/2018) U15 would not have made a team that also has too 02’s. So, they play ECNL. Yes, you guys played some kids that were previously DA, and may be again next year when the 03’s and 04’s combine to make the U16/17 age group.
Now, what REALLY cracks me up is that PDA’s BEST 03’s played DA this year, not ECNL. In fact, the 10 best 2003’s played DA for PDA:
http://plda.ussoccerda.com/sam/teams...p?team=7404816
But hey, if you listen to FESA, DA is garbage! LMFAO!!!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo, the OP (who I would bet $10k is from FESA) is talking about the U16 (03) boys age group. Where the PDA ECNL team just dominated the competition to win “Nationals”:
https://www.elitenationalpremierleag...ow/5047858-16u
Here’s what’s funny about this....he’s right....to some extent. The DA does not have a U16 (03 this past year) age division, they have a U16/17 (03/02) age division. Therefore, a good number of DA players from last year’s (2017/2018) U15 would not have made a team that also has too 02’s. So, they play ECNL. Yes, you guys played some kids that were previously DA, and may be again next year when the 03’s and 04’s combine to make the U16/17 age group.
Now, what REALLY cracks me up is that PDA’s BEST 03’s played DA this year, not ECNL. In fact, the 10 best 2003’s played DA for PDA:
http://plda.ussoccerda.com/sam/teams...p?team=7404816
But hey, if you listen to FESA, DA is garbage! LMFAO!!!
But I will agree that the padding of ECNL teams with DA players is wrong and needs to be fixed.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostJust as a FYI the FESA ECNL 03 boys are not the dominate force they once were.
But I will agree that the padding of ECNL teams with DA players is wrong and needs to be fixed.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo, the OP (who I would bet $10k is from FESA) is talking about the U16 (03) boys age group. Where the PDA ECNL team just dominated the competition to win “Nationals”:
https://www.elitenationalpremierleag...ow/5047858-16u
Here’s what’s funny about this....he’s right....to some extent. The DA does not have a U16 (03 this past year) age division, they have a U16/17 (03/02) age division. Therefore, a good number of DA players from last year’s (2017/2018) U15 would not have made a team that also has too 02’s. So, they play ECNL. Yes, you guys played some kids that were previously DA, and may be again next year when the 03’s and 04’s combine to make the U16/17 age group.
Now, what REALLY cracks me up is that PDA’s BEST 03’s played DA this year, not ECNL. In fact, the 10 best 2003’s played DA for PDA:
http://plda.ussoccerda.com/sam/teams...p?team=7404816
But hey, if you listen to FESA, DA is garbage! LMFAO!!!
- Quote
Comment
Comment