Everything florida elite 2

[Unregistered]

2003 NPL Boys

Let's take a real-world example how taking players based on greed back-fires...

2003 NPLs took a roster of 22...how could they NOT take all these people with big $$$$$ even though only 18 can dress. They don't care - FESA got paid and players didn't really have to commit.

This weekend going to Ft Lauderdale with 10 players = 10 PLAYERS. A few of the kids and parents don't feel like making the drive, even with carpools being offered. A few hurt and a few have been saying all week they were "blowing it off" and NO ONE thought to get guest players from Elite 1 to help? What a waste. FESA got the 22x $$$$ to keep a high roster where quantity was certainly chosen over quality (and commitment) and now this team is, once again, screwed.

My advice - don't worry about retaining those who just want to be on a team without making a commitment and focus on those who DO want to play - because either way (even if it's a lower team). you're losing $ but by creating this money-hungry team, you now have strong players who want to quit since traveling with 9-10 players in an 11v11 is a joke.

This team is a perfect example of the club doing the wrong thing and doing nothing to try to fix it.

[Unregistered]

There have been more than 2-3 moved up to that team in a 2 year period. And moving a player up should be based on ability and fit for the team, irregardless of where the player is coming from.

At least one deserved to move up - wasn't a Scotty or Alberto buddy and moved on her merit. 2 on here told Scotty how great they were without actually ever being seen - and now that they have been seen, they don't want to admit they were wrong!

Since most of the team is talented, there just needs to be a Coach who can capitalize on that by positioning and playing time (and bench time for some).

[Unregistered]

Irregardless is defined as Non standard by dictionaries and should not be used

Even if they come from a “non standard team, ie-rec. If the player fits the team’s need, bring her on.

[Unregistered]

At least one deserved to move up - wasn't a Scotty or Alberto buddy and moved on her merit. 2 on here told Scotty how great they were without actually ever being seen - and now that they have been seen, they don't want to admit they were wrong!

Since most of the team is talented, there just needs to be a Coach who can capitalize on that by positioning and playing time (and bench time for some).

This; this!!!!!

[Unregistered]

Irregardless is defined as Non standard by dictionaries and should not be used

TRUTH we can all agree on

[Unregistered]

At least one deserved to move up - wasn't a Scotty or Alberto buddy and moved on her merit. 2 on here told Scotty how great they were without actually ever being seen - and now that they have been seen, they don't want to admit they were wrong!

Since most of the team is talented, there just needs to be a Coach who can capitalize on that by positioning and playing time (and bench time for some).

This says it all. And the ones who run to directors because they can’t move on merit

[Unregistered]

Some RECs play dual sports and can’t play soccer full time. Some are naturals.

Some I am sure are. Not this one. Sad club does this.

[Unregistered]

At least one deserved to move up - wasn't a Scotty or Alberto buddy and moved on her merit. 2 on here told Scotty how great they were without actually ever being seen - and now that they have been seen, they don't want to admit they were wrong!

Since most of the team is talented, there just needs to be a Coach who can capitalize on that by positioning and playing time (and bench time for some).

3/4 can stand to move down. Maybe 5 if you want to win.

[Unregistered]

Aren’t the 2006!girls like 11 years old? Lots of room for development.

[Unregistered]

Let's take a real-world example how taking players based on greed back-fires...

2003 NPLs took a roster of 22...how could they NOT take all these people with big $$$$$ even though only 18 can dress. They don't care - FESA got paid and players didn't really have to commit.

This weekend going to Ft Lauderdale with 10 players = 10 PLAYERS. A few of the kids and parents don't feel like making the drive, even with carpools being offered. A few hurt and a few have been saying all week they were "blowing it off" and NO ONE thought to get guest players from Elite 1 to help? What a waste. FESA got the 22x $$$$ to keep a high roster where quantity was certainly chosen over quality (and commitment) and now this team is, once again, screwed.

My advice - don't worry about retaining those who just want to be on a team without making a commitment and focus on those who DO want to play - because either way (even if it's a lower team). you're losing $ but by creating this money-hungry team, you now have strong players who want to quit since traveling with 9-10 players in an 11v11 is a joke.

This team is a perfect example of the club doing the wrong thing and doing nothing to try to fix it.

Good thing started with extra players!

[Unregistered]

Aren’t the 2006!girls like 11 years old? Lots of room for development.

You are bad at math

[Unregistered]

You are bad at math

2006 = 7th grader

[Unregistered]

REC movement

In case you haven't figured it out...recreational soccer is the feeder mechanism for lower competative teams...if you're able to sucker 3-4 parents who are paying peanuts and whose time commitment doesn't allow for veiled threats or exile...there's tons of love from Bubb, once moved, you'll never see that old douch€ ever again, and if you try to speak with him, you'll soon realize his vacant gaze reveals the true intent for his initial contact with you.

You've been bubbed...

[Unregistered]

2006 = 7th grader

13 Teen 8th Grade

[Unregistered]

2006 = 7th grader

No. Mostly 13. A few 12. They are in U14 age group. Old enough to bench and move down.