Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Indoor Practices With no Parents feel Safe.
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
It depends. There's NO need for anyone ever than players and coaches and refs, no one unnecessary.
Depends on the size of the place and whether people are really being careful, not just inside the facility but also outside, because that's what messes it up for everyone. A lot of the cornholios on this board aren't really trying, you see them in the parking lot and restaurants.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt depends. There's NO need for anyone ever than players and coaches and refs, no one unnecessary.
Depends on the size of the place and whether people are really being careful, not just inside the facility but also outside, because that's what messes it up for everyone. A lot of the cornholios on this board aren't really trying, you see them in the parking lot and restaurants.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt depends. There's NO need for anyone ever than players and coaches and refs, no one unnecessary.
Depends on the size of the place and whether people are really being careful, not just inside the facility but also outside, because that's what messes it up for everyone. A lot of the cornholios on this board aren't really trying, you see them in the parking lot and restaurants.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Usual off the rails ts chatter, not sure where responses were going? My question was regarding live barn "game view" system that forekicks uses to broadcast games so that spectators can enjoy the view. One poster mentioned some glitches. Overall, does system seem to work? We saw some promos & it looked pretty good, (albeit its their advertising). Personally we are envious of venues/spectators that have this option...we hope this technology spreads.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostUsual off the rails ts chatter, not sure where responses were going? My question was regarding live barn "game view" system that forekicks uses to broadcast games so that spectators can enjoy the view. One poster mentioned some glitches. Overall, does system seem to work? We saw some promos & it looked pretty good, (albeit its their advertising). Personally we are envious of venues/spectators that have this option...we hope this technology spreads.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLive Barn has been in hockey rinks for years. Covid has definitely expanded their business. FYI, you tend to have less glitches if you use the “pano” view.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIts very simple, major risk playing inside but money talks. It is clearly very risky and sorry it is your business. Be careful
This is not just this one doctors opinion either. This is backed up by nearly a year of statistical data across our country.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMy child had a teammate test positive from a non-soccer exposure. All of the teammates were then listed as 'close contacts' and had to test and quarantine. Our pediatrician stated that although there are no 100% guarantees in life, short of that he 'guaranteed' there was no risk of infection from this scenario of playing soccer in masks in a large ventilated space. True to form, not a single kid or coach tested positive across the multiple teams that initial kid had been around.
This is not just this one doctors opinion either. This is backed up by nearly a year of statistical data across our country.
Science supports wearing a mask, being careful around the elderly, and avoiding sex with Haitian prostitutes. Science does not support closing youth activities including school, stopping out-of-state travel, nor 6-Minute Abs
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
love, love , love this indoor training. I'd sit, 2 hours 7 days a week, in my car to have my daughter practice! Thank god for indoor winter training.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMy child had a teammate test positive from a non-soccer exposure. All of the teammates were then listed as 'close contacts' and had to test and quarantine. Our pediatrician stated that although there are no 100% guarantees in life, short of that he 'guaranteed' there was no risk of infection from this scenario of playing soccer in masks in a large ventilated space. True to form, not a single kid or coach tested positive across the multiple teams that initial kid had been around.
This is not just this one doctors opinion either. This is backed up by nearly a year of statistical data across our country.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHad the same experience. One player went to a party w/ her HS team and later found out they all had it from that party. She had been attending club practices at the same time during this. Whole club team was quaranteed for two weeks. Nobody on the club team got it. Also worth noting 5 players on her HS team were NOT at the party, and they didn't get it, either.
Kids are going to find something to do, why not provide them with something safe and controlled.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostStop this nonsense. "I listen to science" does not actually mean that anyone applies the scientific method nor is data driven. It is an emotional meme invoked by those without critical thinking skills or the impetus to do their own research as a method of justifying an action that don't really understand.
Science supports wearing a mask, being careful around the elderly, and avoiding sex with Haitian prostitutes. Science does not support closing youth activities including school, stopping out-of-state travel, nor 6-Minute Abs
One hundred percent correct. "Science supports" is a buzz phrase used by morons to support positions that they could not critically defend if their lives depended on it. Usually, the morons understand neither the issues at hand, nor the "science" to which they vaguely allude. Certain they can't identify the studies nor have any understanding of their contents other than some vague impression based on the misleading or incorrect characterizations from a talking head on CNN or MSNBC. But that is hardly a surprise given the left's 50 year war on excellence and standards. What used to be a F is now a C, what used to be a C is now an A-. And the idiot getting an A- minus thinks he has accomplished something.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOne hundred percent correct. "Science supports" is a buzz phrase used by morons to support positions that they could not critically defend if their lives depended on it. Usually, the morons understand neither the issues at hand, nor the "science" to which they vaguely allude. Certain they can't identify the studies nor have any understanding of their contents other than some vague impression based on the misleading or incorrect characterizations from a talking head on CNN or MSNBC. But that is hardly a surprise given the left's 50 year war on excellence and standards. What used to be a F is now a C, what used to be a C is now an A-. And the idiot getting an A- minus thinks he has accomplished something.
- Quote
Comment
Comment