Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
U.S. Women's Soccer Star: I'll Probably Never Sing the National Anthem Again
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWe disagree. It is disqualifying for me...just doing it, but even more so for the refusal to ever apologize. I'm in one 40%, you're in another 40%. Will all come down to the last 10-20%.
Ineligible - legally or officially unable to be considered for a position or benefit.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWell, you're just wrong then. Transgenders are as much transgender as you are heterosexual (assuming you are) or others homosexual. With the difference being that overall their lives are far more difficult and dangerous.
HRC would have been a great President...the most qualified candidate in history. Unfortunately, if she had been elected the right would not have allowed her to do anything. In fact, they vowed to keep having investigations of Benghazi (a horrific tragedy but not a crime) even after finding nothing. On Trump, we'll see how much of a collapse there is. Hopefully we can through the rest of last two years without a total collapse.
BTW, what do you think one of Fox's prime time stars would have done if they had come across tapes of Obama calling into talk shows as someone else praising himself? Or if there had been a fake and corrupt Obama University? Or if Obama had bragged about "grabbing them by the...and doing whatever I want with them"?
I laugh at you and your Obama reference.... Of course there is always this back and forth political talk amongst differing candidates/parties. That’s always been there and will always be there... But if you are going to suggest that DT has not been scrutinized more than any other political candidate in recent history then I will have to laugh at you. It’s ridiculous. I must admit though, I feel like it might be backfiring on them. People are getting sick of it and realizing that the vast majority of the DT stuff is just nonsense and ongoing political attacks.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDisqualify - pronounce (someone) ineligible for an office, activity, or competition because of an offense or infringement
Ineligible - legally or officially unable to be considered for a position or benefit.
I'll give you an example....so and so is a white supremacist nationalist, and some might consider that disqualifying. Get it?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI laugh at you and your Obama reference.... Of course there is always this back and forth political talk amongst differing candidates/parties. That’s always been there and will always be there... But if you are going to suggest that DT has not been scrutinized more than any other political candidate in recent history then I will have to laugh at you. It’s ridiculous. I must admit though, I feel like it might be backfiring on them. People are getting sick of it and realizing that the vast majority of the DT stuff is just nonsense and ongoing political attacks.
Nonsense? Do you think DT is corrupt or not? Did you pick Trump University over a NESCAC? Do you want your next President to have called into talk shows as an imposter to promote himself?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDT has been scrutinized more than HRC was? Really? Trey Gowdy and Jason Chaffetz are STILL talking about HRC every day.
Nonsense? Do you think DT is corrupt or not? Did you pick Trump University over a NESCAC? Do you want your next President to have called into talk shows as an imposter to promote himself?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMaybe you've watched CNN or FOX or any news channel....and seen senators and congresspeople asked if various things are disqualifying or would be disqualifying. The answer for someone to say yes doesn't have to rise to the level of illegality or a crime. But you knew that and are just being difficult.
I'll give you an example....so and so is a white supremacist nationalist, and some might consider that disqualifying. Get it?
Legally, a 25-year old would be disqualified. Not just because they are a doooosh
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHe caved (and shouldn't have had to) and divulged the certificate in 2008. In 2016 (yes, 2016), Trump was still insisting on and pushing birtherism. Trump should have been disqualified on that basis along, aside from the other 5000 reasons he should be disqualified.
And with the taxes, Trump is on record insisting that Presidential candidates should disclose their taxes, and before the fiction he started about an audit he vowed to disclose them. And now we're here. Wonder why.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAnd it was before the Democrats and some anti-Trump republicans pushed the fiction they started about Russia collusion. Times change and Trump has zero to gain by turning over his taxes to those hyena's.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOf course you don't. Serve yourself up a Trump steak with a Trump wine and you're all set.
And guess what....the taxes are coming out.
My, you certainly are a bitter person.
Just vote him out. Stop with crying about the past. Crap...my 6-year old knows when to move on. Just puts the band-aid on the scraped knee and gets back out there.
- Quote
Comment
Comment