Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Jill Ellis $90k bonus vs Klinsman $500k bonus
Collapse
X
-
UnregisteredTags: None
- Quote
-
Unregistered
She should give it back. She'll never win another thing. US had a giant head start over other nations in women's soccer but Ellis gave it up and will forever be looking in the rearview mirror.
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostShe should give it back. She'll never win another thing. US had a giant head start over other nations in women's soccer but Ellis gave it up and will forever be looking in the rearview mirror.
Only a couple of titles v Kling Boy nada por nada.
Dude parked obscene bucks.
Per title, not even close.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostShe should give it back. She'll never win another thing. US had a giant head start over other nations in women's soccer but Ellis gave it up and will forever be looking in the rearview mirror.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostShe should give it back. She'll never win another thing. US had a giant head start over other nations in women's soccer but Ellis gave it up and will forever be looking in the rearview mirror.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Look at the attendance of any women's game to see the (lack of) impact Ellis has truly had on the game. She should not have gotten one cent.
...and Klinsmann was awful so he shouldn't have gotten a dime either. Fans go to men's games because it's just better soccer. A good 16 year old boys club team would beat the USWNT so why spend money watching any women's team? Political correctness just isn't a good enough reason.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
The fact that Klinsmann was massively overpaid has nothing to do with the fact that Ellis was overpaid, too.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLook at the attendance of any women's game to see the (lack of) impact Ellis has truly had on the game. She should not have gotten one cent.
...and Klinsmann was awful so he shouldn't have gotten a dime either. Fans go to men's games because it's just better soccer. A good 16 year old boys club team would beat the USWNT so why spend money watching any women's team? Political correctness just isn't a good enough reason.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAnd yet the women's program earned more money than the men last year!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLook at the attendance of any women's game to see the (lack of) impact Ellis has truly had on the game. She should not have gotten one cent.
...and Klinsmann was awful so he shouldn't have gotten a dime either. Fans go to men's games because it's just better soccer. A good 16 year old boys club team would beat the USWNT so why spend money watching any women's team? Political correctness just isn't a good enough reason.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...-world-cup-win
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLook I'm no JE fan. But she can't control the popularity ,or lack there of, for women's soccer. She isn't the chief marketing officer for USSF. What she can do, and has done, is bring home wins to hopefully build a fan base for the future. whether or not she can continue remains to be seen, but that isn't what a bonus is based on. It's based on accomplishments not hopeful accomplishments. JK didn't win squat and bailed pretty quickly
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...-world-cup-win
I was wrong you are right.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWhoopie do. It's a women's sport. Nobody cares. At best, it's a minor distraction for the World Cup and Olympics. The other three and three-quarter years, nobody gives a hoot.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Ellis' bonus was 42% or her base earnings while Klinsmann was 18%
but the men's tournament generates substantially more revenue than the women's competition. That money is subsequently passed along to participating federations by FIFA, soccer's global governing body.
The 2015 women's champion (United States) received $2 million, while the 2014 men's winner (Germany) got $35 million. For advancing to the knockout stage, the U.S. men earned $9 million. Much of that money is distributed among the players. The USSF has been pushing FIFA to increase women's earnings in future World Cups.
In general, the U.S. men and women have different salary structures: The men have contracts with individual pro teams and are compensated by the USSF for national team work only, while most of the women are paid by the federation to play in the NWSL and for the national team. (An exception is Crystal Dunn, who left the NWSL for English club Chelsea this winter and receives a prorated salary for national team duty.)
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI don't disagree one bit, yet, despite this TREMENDOUS disadvantage, the women made a larger profit than the men last year ..... how could this happen given the HUGE monetary and popularity advantages of the men's side??????
- Quote
Comment
Comment