Which club - OW or FSA would you start an 09 boy at?
-
-
If only those two? OW. Better price value and better Ulittle training. But he's very young and you may want to stay with town soccer (unless it's horrifically bad) and supplement with programs at OW or others. It gives you a chance to check out the club more closely and see how serious he is about it before sinking bigger $ into it.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
-
Both are good, FSA is actually a better value up until about U13.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
No chance. Oakwood trains 3 times a week u9 and up.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
NO WAY! Wow, that is revolutionary! So does FSA and Sporting .... for less money moron!Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
so does fsa...Comment
-
It is their HS girls teams (ECNL included) that do not practice 3x per week ..... and they charge the most absurd amount of money!Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
And that's for the teams in the most competitive league in the country. Makes sense right - practice less but play tougher competition and pay more for the privilege?Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
And back to young boys - is the coaching better at one over the other? Better to be at oakwood than second team at FSA?Comment
-
Oakwood's prices and package info is on their website. Is FSA's? If yes, I'd love to compare the 2. No way FSA's value is that of Oakwood's.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Who cares? Neither are developing. OW has more turnover on the boys side than they do on the girls side.Comment
-
Never do a B team if you can avoid it (ok for first year premier players). FSA Elite or OW are both good boys programs for little kids. They will play with and against other strong players and coaching is good.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Keep your head in that kool-aid. It's actually been cheaper historically up until U12 or so. Plus, OW just dramatically increased their fees. OW still seems to be a much better value at U13 and up where FSA goes well above $3k.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
US Soccer saving the world and bringing you cheaper soccer ..... looks like the boys side academy players (and the girls too) now have to bear the brunt of the cost increases:Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
2017-18 OAKWOOD SOCCER CLUB DUES STRUCTURE
------------------------------------------------
GIRL'S YTL (U8) 2010/11 $1,800
GIRL'S U9 2009 $2,200
GIRL'S U10 2008 $2,400
GIRL'S U11 2007 $2,400
GIRL'S U12 2006 NPL $2,600
GIRL'S U13 2005 NPL $2,600
GIRL'S U14 ACADEMY 2004 $2,600
GIRL'S U15 ACADEMY 2003 $2,600
GIRL'S U16 2002 NPL $1,950
GIRL'S U17/16 01/02 ACADEMY $1,950
GIRL'S U19/18 ACADEMY 99/00 $1,950
GIRL'S U18 00/01 NPL $1,950
BOY'S YTL 2010/2011 $1,800
BOY'S U9 2009 $2,200
BOY'S U10 2008 $2,400
BOY'S U11 2007 $2,400
BOY'S U12 ACADEMY 2006 $2,600
BOY'S U13 ACADEMY 2005 $2,600
BOY'S U14 ACADEMY 2004 $2,600
BOY'S U15 ACADEMY 2003 $2,600
BOY'S U16 PRE ACADEMY 2002 $2,600
BOY'S U16/17 ACADEMY 01/00 $1,950
BOY'S U18/19 ACADEMY 99/00 $1,950
------------------------------------------------
2016-17 OAKWOOD SOCCER CLUB DUES STRUCTURE:
------------------------------------------------
Girl’s YTL U8 2009 $1,600
Girl’s U9 2008 $2,000
Girl’s U10 2007 $2,200
Girl’s U11 2006 $2,200
Girl’s U12 2005 NPL $2,400
Girl’s U13 2004 NPL $2,400
Girl’s U14 2003 NPL $2,400
Girl’s U15 2002 NPL $1,800
Girl’s U16 2001 NPL $1,800
Girl’s U17 2000 NPL $1,200
Girl’s U19 1999/98 NPL $1,200
Boy’s YTL 2008/2009 $1,600
Boy’s U9 2007 $2,000
Boy’s U10 2006 $2,200
Boy’s U11 Pre Academy 2005 $2,400
Boy’s U12 Academy 2004 $2,400
Boy’s U13 Academy 2003 $2,400
Boy’s U14 Academy 2002 $2,400
Boy’s U15 Pre Academy 2001 $2,400
Boy’s U16 Academy 2000 $1,200
Boy’s U18 Academy 1998 $1,200
------------------------------------------------Comment
Comment