Trying to figure out what set off this series of threads on Timbers relationship.
Was it 1 simple post "I don't like the fact that Peregrine uses OYSA profits to support Thorns Academy, but at least they are partially subsidizing" or was it something else recently? The 1 post seemed to setoff a bunch of anti-Peregrine posts and corresponding responses from the other side of the argument.
Did something change at OYSA or is it business as usual?
Was it 1 simple post "I don't like the fact that Peregrine uses OYSA profits to support Thorns Academy, but at least they are partially subsidizing" or was it something else recently? The 1 post seemed to setoff a bunch of anti-Peregrine posts and corresponding responses from the other side of the argument.
Did something change at OYSA or is it business as usual?
Comment