Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Democrats are unhinged
Collapse
X
-
UnregisteredTags: None
- Quote
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
https://www.csis.org/ground-combatti...ht-wing-terror
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...adicalism.html
https://www.businessinsider.com/extr...-report-2019-1
https://www.latimes.com/politics/sto...ht-wing-groups
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-c...wing-terrorism
https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...rorist-threat/
And there it is folks. This is what Trump supporters vote for. How has that helped us over the last 3 years? What have they accomplished? One giant concerted effort to drain the swamp and they can’t even do that right. How utterly incompetent. And we’re supposed to think this country would be better off with fvckface von clownstick running the show for another 4 years? What a joke!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Posthttps://www.csis.org/ground-combatti...ht-wing-terror
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...adicalism.html
https://www.businessinsider.com/extr...-report-2019-1
https://www.latimes.com/politics/sto...ht-wing-groups
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-c...wing-terrorism
https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...rorist-threat/
And there it is folks. This is what Trump supporters vote for. How has that helped us over the last 3 years? What have they accomplished? One giant concerted effort to drain the swamp and they can’t even do that right. How utterly incompetent. And we’re supposed to think this country would be better off with fvckface von clownstick running the show for another 4 years? What a joke!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
What's the point of all those links? Are you saying the left advocates violence against the police and all that other craziness? Nobody here or anywhere else is saying that. The left doesn't support extremism any more than the right supports all the right-wing terrorism referenced in post #7.
You do disavow right-wing terrorism, right?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
1. You claimed all the witnesses in the impeachment inquiry testified there was no quid pro quo, but when asked for links you were unable or unwilling to back it up. FAIL
2. Your evidence that Sondland said no quid pro quo turned out to be the denial by Trump himself. FAIL
3. You implied that clerical dishonesty by an FBI lawyer (who was subsequently fired) would render the Russia investigation invalid, but you missed the part where the IG said the underlying justification for the FISA warrants was still valid. FAIL
4. You said impeachment support was declining, using a poll as evidence, then immediately posted a rant about how polls were unreliable. FAIL
5. All you had left at the end of the day was to attack the dems for being inconsistent in labeling Trump's crimes, not even bothering to deny they occurred. FAIL
You were so humiliated that you retreated to your safe space of trashing liberals in a new thread. Hope you feel better now.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI understand why you wanted to create this new thread. You had a pretty rough day yesterday. Let's recap:
1. You claimed all the witnesses in the impeachment inquiry testified there was no quid pro quo, but when asked for links you were unable or unwilling to back it up. FAIL
2. Your evidence that Sondland said no quid pro quo turned out to be the denial by Trump himself. FAIL
3. You implied that clerical dishonesty by an FBI lawyer (who was subsequently fired) would render the Russia investigation invalid, but you missed the part where the IG said the underlying justification for the FISA warrants was still valid. FAIL
4. You said impeachment support was declining, using a poll as evidence, then immediately posted a rant about how polls were unreliable. FAIL
5. All you had left at the end of the day was to attack the dems for being inconsistent in labeling Trump's crimes, not even bothering to deny they occurred. FAIL
You were so humiliated that you retreated to your safe space of trashing liberals in a new thread. Hope you feel better now.
https://www.politico.com/blogs/polit...clines-1522999
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...poll?_amp=true
https://www.syracuse.com/news/2019/1...outputType=amp
https://www.wuwm.com/post/impeachmen...shows#stream/0
Here is just a tidbit of clips from facts witnesses. Tell me how this is supposed to take down the POTUS?
https://youtu.be/a8bqxlzqy3c
https://youtu.be/b-DbvapybVs
https://youtu.be/J3pxtj9P3T4
Yovonavich and Hill had already been removed for their positions and were back in the US during the Trump phone call and testified did not hear about the “quid pro quo” call until it was released by the media. Kent and Taylor testified their information was second and third hand from Sondland who admitted no one on the planet told him about quid pro quo and that it was presumed. Holmes testified he heard Trump across the table through Sondlands phone that wasn’t on speaker. He further testified he could not hear the rest of the conversation. And that’s so whole case?
Reply With Quote
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
I condemn any type of terrorism regardless of where it comes from. But if you are referring to nazis and skinheads as being far right their views are more in line with the left now. Democrats Nazis skinheads are all anti-Semitic. Several Democrats have recently made comments that are anti-semitic and not one Democrat condemned it. To answer your first question I put those videos there to trigger you and other liberals. Seems to be working.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI understand why you wanted to create this new thread. You had a pretty rough day yesterday. Let's recap:
1. You claimed all the witnesses in the impeachment inquiry testified there was no quid pro quo, but when asked for links you were unable or unwilling to back it up. FAIL
2. Your evidence that Sondland said no quid pro quo turned out to be the denial by Trump himself. FAIL
3. You implied that clerical dishonesty by an FBI lawyer (who was subsequently fired) would render the Russia investigation invalid, but you missed the part where the IG said the underlying justification for the FISA warrants was still valid. FAIL
4. You said impeachment support was declining, using a poll as evidence, then immediately posted a rant about how polls were unreliable. FAIL
5. All you had left at the end of the day was to attack the dems for being inconsistent in labeling Trump's crimes, not even bothering to deny they occurred. FAIL
You were so humiliated that you retreated to your safe space of trashing liberals in a new thread. Hope you feel better now.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Comment