Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Media Lies

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Media Lies

    In this story by liberal Reuters

    http://news.trust.org/item/20191026235000-1j5di

    we have the theme "William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine" corroborated evidence against Trump provided by others (while not saying what that was) and "testified on Tuesday that Trump made the withheld aid contingent on Zelenskiy announcing the requested investigations."

    Yet they do not address the obvious problem with this - the fact that:

    a) there was never a public announcement of such an investigation by Ukraine
    b) but nevertheless, the aid was released

    Sort of proves the entire thing is a scam doesnt it? No wonder they are doing everything in secret, leaking selectively to liberal media allies. Shame on Reuters. Fortunately, they underestimate the intelligence of the American voting public. Everyone knows this is a scam. Reuters needs to take the word "trust" out of its URL/nameplate. We have none. Sorry.

    #2
    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    In this story by liberal Reuters

    http://news.trust.org/item/20191026235000-1j5di

    we have the theme "William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine" corroborated evidence against Trump provided by others (while not saying what that was) and "testified on Tuesday that Trump made the withheld aid contingent on Zelenskiy announcing the requested investigations."

    Yet they do not address the obvious problem with this - the fact that:

    a) there was never a public announcement of such an investigation by Ukraine
    b) but nevertheless, the aid was released

    Sort of proves the entire thing is a scam doesnt it? No wonder they are doing everything in secret, leaking selectively to liberal media allies. Shame on Reuters. Fortunately, they underestimate the intelligence of the American voting public. Everyone knows this is a scam. Reuters needs to take the word "trust" out of its URL/nameplate. We have none. Sorry.
    Sorry you're this stupid.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      In this story by liberal Reuters

      http://news.trust.org/item/20191026235000-1j5di

      we have the theme "William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine" corroborated evidence against Trump provided by others (while not saying what that was) and "testified on Tuesday that Trump made the withheld aid contingent on Zelenskiy announcing the requested investigations."

      Yet they do not address the obvious problem with this - the fact that:

      a) there was never a public announcement of such an investigation by Ukraine
      b) but nevertheless, the aid was released

      Sort of proves the entire thing is a scam doesnt it? No wonder they are doing everything in secret, leaking selectively to liberal media allies. Shame on Reuters. Fortunately, they underestimate the intelligence of the American voting public. Everyone knows this is a scam. Reuters needs to take the word "trust" out of its URL/nameplate. We have none. Sorry.
      Turkey, Russia, US, Kurds all cooperated in Al-Bagdahdi's death. Sort of belies the DNC/Never Trump/fake news narrative that pulling the small number of US troops out of Syria was a disaster.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Sorry you're this stupid.
        Yes ... too bad the poster is not as smart as the average voter in California who elected this jewel to congress: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep...r-with-staffer

        Threesomes? Naked pix with lesbian lover? Public drunkeness? Affair with staffer?
        Are you fricking kidding me? These are the people leading the impeachment probe?

        Democrats = no moral compass ...

        I hope the sodomist is your nominee - that will be funny.

        This is what you get when you vote Democrats = bat sh!t crazy.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post


          Democrats = no moral compass ...
          That's rich....a Trumper mentioning a moral compass 😆😂🤣

          Trump is the pillar of morals🙄

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            In this story by liberal Reuters

            http://news.trust.org/item/20191026235000-1j5di

            we have the theme "William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine" corroborated evidence against Trump provided by others (while not saying what that was) and "testified on Tuesday that Trump made the withheld aid contingent on Zelenskiy announcing the requested investigations."

            Yet they do not address the obvious problem with this - the fact that:

            a) there was never a public announcement of such an investigation by Ukraine
            b) but nevertheless, the aid was released

            Sort of proves the entire thing is a scam doesnt it? No wonder they are doing everything in secret, leaking selectively to liberal media allies. Shame on Reuters. Fortunately, they underestimate the intelligence of the American voting public. Everyone knows this is a scam. Reuters needs to take the word "trust" out of its URL/nameplate. We have none. Sorry.
            Today's news about Al-Bag-Daddy is how you do it. End the endless wars by withdrawing troops. Make the stakeholders in the region pay to clean up the mess, with the risk that if they do not, ISIS will immigrate across their borders. Wage economic warfare against those that do not cooperate. Then whack the terrorist moles (which Commie WashPost called an "esteemed religious scholar" before retracting) one by one.

            A lot cheaper monetarily, and with far less loss of American lives.

            Trump is a stable genius like he says. Thank God we have a non-establishment businessman in the oval office to do things right, in the interests of middle-Americans instead of the swamp creature establishment types who want endless wars and endless $$$'s flowing to the military industrial complex = further colonialism and debt.

            After criticizsing his withdrawal approach this week they are now all singing his praises!

            Comment


              #7
              So why are we sending MORE troops to protect oil fields in Saudi Arabia and Syria? Follow the money....more of our Troops at risk over black gold and keeping MBS happy.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Yes ... too bad the poster is not as smart as the average voter in California who elected this jewel to congress: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep...r-with-staffer

                Threesomes? Naked pix with lesbian lover? Public drunkeness? Affair with staffer?
                Are you fricking kidding me? These are the people leading the impeachment probe?

                Democrats = no moral compass ...

                I hope the sodomist is your nominee - that will be funny.

                This is what you get when you vote Democrats = bat sh!t crazy.
                There's this saying about glass houses. https://www.ranker.com/list/republic...ls/web-infoguy

                Pretty rich coming from someone who steadfastly supports a guy who cheated on three wives and brags about committing sexual assault on tape. As long as you guys own Trump, there is no way you can legitimately claim the moral high ground.

                Here's the difference, Sparky.

                You lot will continue to back your sleaze bags to the grave while the Democrats show their transgressors the door. Did you miss the part where she is resigning?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  So why are we sending MORE troops to protect oil fields in Saudi Arabia and Syria? Follow the money....more of our Troops at risk over black gold and keeping MBS happy.
                  Those details mess with their pulling out saves our troops narrative. They'll never include that little tidbit in their posts that demand we posit an alternative strategy when the Pentagon has already said repeatedly they had a phased exit strategy when Trump stupidly yanked everyone out. Apparently agreeing with the Pentagon's original strategy doesn't count as giving them an alternate to Trump's bonehead move. I seriously wonder how the Trumpists on this forum get through the day without winning a Darwin award.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Those details mess with their pulling out saves our troops narrative. They'll never include that little tidbit in their posts that demand we posit an alternative strategy when the Pentagon has already said repeatedly they had a phased exit strategy when Trump stupidly yanked everyone out. Apparently agreeing with the Pentagon's original strategy doesn't count as giving them an alternate to Trump's bonehead move. I seriously wonder how the Trumpists on this forum get through the day without winning a Darwin award.
                    Is brain damage a genetic or learned trait? Regardless of the reason, it can be cured when you open yourself to different ideas, points of views and most importantly facts.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      So why are we sending MORE troops to protect oil fields in Saudi Arabia and Syria? Follow the money....more of our Troops at risk over black gold and keeping MBS happy.
                      Thanks to General Bonespurs and his military "genius" chances are we won't be so fortunate next time.

                      "Al-Baghdadi Raid Was a Victory Built on Factors Trump Derides"

                      The president cast the death of the ISIS leader as validation of his disengagement strategy. But it required intelligence agencies and allies he has spurned...." https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/27/u...gtype=Homepage

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Thanks to General Bonespurs and his military "genius" chances are we won't be so fortunate next time.
                        Putin appears to be throwing his butt boy under a bus as well.

                        https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ation-RIA.html

                        This is the sixth time al Baghdadi's death has been announced.

                        6/12/16: al-Baghdadi killed in a US airstrike.
                        5/28/17: killed in Russian air strike.
                        6/11/17: killed in Syrian artillery strike.
                        6/29/17: Iranian leader says he's "definitely dead."
                        7/11/17: Syrian Observatory for Human Rights confirmed his death.

                        Trump claims he watched the raid like he was watching a movie. That's not even possible. That's not the type of footage he would have been seeing if he even watched it as it transpired. Nor would he have seen in the tunnel at all until the body cam footage from the soldiers was available. He has quite the morbid imagination.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Putin appears to be throwing his butt boy under a bus as well.

                          https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ation-RIA.html

                          This is the sixth time al Baghdadi's death has been announced.

                          6/12/16: al-Baghdadi killed in a US airstrike.
                          5/28/17: killed in Russian air strike.
                          6/11/17: killed in Syrian artillery strike.
                          6/29/17: Iranian leader says he's "definitely dead."
                          7/11/17: Syrian Observatory for Human Rights confirmed his death.

                          Trump claims he watched the raid like he was watching a movie. That's not even possible. That's not the type of footage he would have been seeing if he even watched it as it transpired. Nor would he have seen in the tunnel at all until the body cam footage from the soldiers was available. He has quite the morbid imagination.
                          Funny, Obama and Hillary both stated they watched the Bin Laden raid live from the situation room. Gee I guess technology was much better 8 years ago! LMAO

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Funny, Obama and Hillary both stated they watched the Bin Laden raid live from the situation room. Gee I guess technology was much better 8 years ago! LMAO
                            He absolutely could have watched it live, it just wouldn't have been "as though you were watching a movie." That's the part he's lying about. Obama and Hillary never characterized what they saw in that way. The footage Trump would have been privy to in the situation room would have consisted of overhead surveillance in the dark with heat signatures differentiating between US military and the other people in the area. Those camera wouldn't have been able to see into the tunnel or have audio. The descriptions Trump gave in his rambling announcement Sunday morning were the product of his imagination.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Funny, Obama and Hillary both stated they watched the Bin Laden raid live from the situation room. Gee I guess technology was much better 8 years ago! LMAO
                              Please provide a link that confirms what you are saying (BTW, that's always a good idea when the truth is on your side). I don't think you'll find it.

                              My recollection was that Obama was very careful not to give too much away in terms of technical capabilities. He implied that he had a live audio feed but not video. It's refreshing to have a commander-in-chief wanting to protect sources & methods vs. the current one who just want to tell a spectacular story to puff up his own image and deflect from other damaging current events.

                              Given the statements from the Russians linked in post #12 above, I'm not convinced the supposed al Baghdadi killing even happened at all.

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X