Originally posted by The Libtard Guy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Trump blames parkland massacre on shooter’s “neighbors and classmates”
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYour supposed "peer reviewed" sources were all debunked. But in your Gish Gallop of misinformation, I might have missed one. So kindly remind us of the one you think is best. The actual link, please. I'll wait.
J. Zachos, et al (2001) – Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate 65 Ma to Present, Science 292 (5517), 686–693
The last 5 million years has seen extensive cooling with vastly higher temperatures than today;
L. E. Lisiecki and M. E. Raymo (2005) – A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records, Paleoceanography 20, 1003
GPS2 ice core data from NOAA shows the cooling trend over the past 1,000 to 3,000 years in 10-60 year increments:
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-acces...imatology-data
This data shows that we have been experiencing declining temperatures for the past 3,000 years. Greenland is now colder than for most of the past 10,000 years. Temperatures are only considered to be increasing if viewed for the last 150 years, from 1850 onward, which is roughly when thermometers began collecting global data, and is also the period of time the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has chosen for its review.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThere has been 65 million years of global cooling to this point in time:
J. Zachos, et al (2001) – Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate 65 Ma to Present, Science 292 (5517), 686–693
The last 5 million years has seen extensive cooling with vastly higher temperatures than today;
L. E. Lisiecki and M. E. Raymo (2005) – A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records, Paleoceanography 20, 1003
GPS2 ice core data from NOAA shows the cooling trend over the past 1,000 to 3,000 years in 10-60 year increments:
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-acces...imatology-data
This data shows that we have been experiencing declining temperatures for the past 3,000 years. Greenland is now colder than for most of the past 10,000 years. Temperatures are only considered to be increasing if viewed for the last 150 years, from 1850 onward, which is roughly when thermometers began collecting global data, and is also the period of time the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has chosen for its review.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by unregistered View Postyou are not fooling anyone. Liberals are well known to creep on issues like abortion drug legalization and gun control by starting with small steps leading to larger ones.
The problem is genetically defective psychopaths, of whom most are on your side. You know - the irrational, pathologically self absorbed, sometimes outright psychotic.
If he didnt have an ar15 he would have walked in with bombs, or a machete, and the death toll would have been the same. We need to regulate libtards not guns. Guns protect us from libtards as they creep from socialism to communism to authoritarianism dictatorship.
The gun did not kill those kids the person behind the trigger did. Libby stop blaming guns blame the killer.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThere you go again, Mr. Strawman. I didn't criticize Buzzfeed, I criticized SurveyMonkey. Please explain how conclusions from an online survey in which the respondents were self-selected proves anything.
SurveyMonkey was founded by liberals.
They show the typical liberal line with their various surveys on Trump
https://www.surveymonkey.com/curiosi...ates-approval/
They are part of the liberal machine.
Virtually every single poll that drives your sides policy choices is based on surveys from groups like SurveyMonkey - digital (and phone) surveys - you know, the ones that tell you today that Democrats are going to retake the house, and that Trump's approval ratings are so low. You seem to have no trouble accepting digital surveys there...
What you do is squirm and contort to try and get out of data that doesnt support your cult position on liberalism but you are not fooling anyone. Liberals here are telling you that you guys are sick in the head, and you still wont believe it. Would you believe it more if it were conservatives that say it? OK then here it is from me: you guys are sick in the head.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
gun violence is on the decline but we have more guns. Take away the gun argument has been thoroughly disproven.
Remember the Gun Violence stats include suicides
But it is the guns.
Northwestern study since 1980 there has been 15-20 mass shootings in the USA each year.
What has changed we now live in a 24hr news cycle.
The first step is the media should not rush to social media to post the shooter's social media, pictures, and background information.
The media is giving the shooter the infamy they want. It might seem trivial but if not making the shooter infamous prevents one mass shooting it is worth it.
Anderson Cooper said last year he would not mention the shooter's name. That is a win for AC.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic:
https://nypost.com/2016/06/09/scienc...chotic-traits/
with the academic publication correction referenced by this news story found here:
https://ajps.org/
Go ahead and dismiss because NY Post is not uber-liberal. But you have to dismiss the American Journal of Political Science too.
Notice how the "error" was reported widely by the liberal media but the correction not so much - this is another classic propaganda tactic of the Marxist left - you people are so dark and disturbed you dont seem to understand that if you have to lie cheat and steal to attain something, maybe that something is not worth the effort.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Here is a book I recommend for you:
The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness Paperback – October 21, 2011
https://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Mind-.../dp/0977956318
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTax supported youth programs like soccer could help save us.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou are not fooling anyone. Liberals are well known to creep on issues like abortion drug legalization and gun control by starting with small steps leading to larger ones.
The problem is genetically defective psychopaths, of whom most are on your side. You know - the irrational, pathologically self absorbed, sometimes outright psychotic.
If he didnt have an AR15 he would have walked in with bombs, or a machete, and the death toll would have been the same. We need to regulate Libtards not guns. Guns protect us from Libtards as they creep from Socialism to Communism to Authoritarianism Dictatorship.
But I am more of a pragmatist. I think what’s needed is a combination of mental health services specifically geared to troubled young men and common sense background checks. Not outlawing guns even AR-15 because like I said there are millions of responsible gun owners. I think coalescing around a middle ground like I suggested would be a great start. That’s how politics used to work until the ideologues like you took things over.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTotally the FBI & Democrats fault,.They waste so much of the FBI's time trying to find dirt on our President that doesn't exist they don't have time for real threats like the shooter posted on Social media.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Full disclosure, I'm a hard-core conservative. I voted for Trump, I believe in hard work, personal freedom and holding people responsible for their actions. I have no desire to hunt, but I wouldn't deny anyone the right to do so if they enjoy that and do it responsibly.
So with that said, can any of you gun rights advocates explain to me why in the world anyone needs a semi-automatic assault weapon with a magazine (regardless of capacity)? I mean you wouldn't hunt with one, right? And you wouldn't open up with one on a home intruder, would you? Wouldn't you go for the handgun first in close quarters? So why in the world is anyone defending the need to sell or own these things? They have only one purpose, and that is multiple casualties. Why are they legal?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI am fully aware that all politicians of all stripes like to take small steps to achieve larger objectives. If you believe in an ideology then you think like this. On the right or the left.
But I am more of a pragmatist. I think what’s needed is a combination of mental health services specifically geared to troubled young men and common sense background checks. Not outlawing guns even AR-15 because like I said there are millions of responsible gun owners. I think coalescing around a middle ground like I suggested would be a great start. That’s how politics used to work until the ideologues like you took things over.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWell I agree with that. 19 year olds with a history of animal mutilation and other behavioral red flags should not be able to buy an AR15, among many other things like nitrate fertilizers, machetes, chainsaws etc., and should not have access to school grounds they have been expelled from.
- Quote
Comment
Comment