I should've signed my prior post -- the guy who started the thread a year or two ago polling visitors to exile one or the other and it was no great surprise that it was Perspective hitting the bricks by a 2 to 1 margin.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Can We Just Rename the Site "BTDT and His Agendas"?
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
If you ran that same poll today it would easily be 5-1, maybe even 10-1, Perspective hitting the bricks. Assuming Perspective doesn't stuff the ballot box as he is wont to do.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIf you ran that same poll today it would easily be 5-1, maybe even 10-1, Perspective hitting the bricks. Assuming Perspective doesn't stuff the ballot box as he is wont to do.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI should've signed my prior post -- the guy who started the thread a year or two ago polling visitors to exile one or the other and it was no great surprise that it was Perspective hitting the bricks by a 2 to 1 margin.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt's pretty ironic that Perspective is this elitist liberal who would love to engineer the outcomes on how everyone visiting this site views what they read.
It seems painfully obvious that for all the complaining by way of shining the spotlight incessantly that the unintended consequence is Perspective does a better job of discrediting himself than BTDT could ever hope to promote this so-called agenda.
If Perspective could manage to treat BTDT like a tree falling in the woods, all sorts of good things would happen, whether BTDT began to annoy the **** out of everyone or Perspective stopped annoying the **** out of everyone...or both.
He's too far gone to help himself though.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSpeaking of ballot stuffers, based on these posts and these 5 to 1 and 10 to 1 estimations you would think we could get AT LEAST ONE post (written by someone other than BTDT) vouching for him. Maybe some day.
BTDT may annoy people but I think there are a fair number of people that would celebrate if something drastic happen and couldn't post again.
That must sux to be that hated. I am not talking about annoyed. I am talking about deep down spit-on you hatred. That is hard to comprehend.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAmusing how Perspective loves to pretend that the Stars don't have well known reputations for many things and how no one can talk about issues simply because that club has strong positions on certain issues.
1) can't talk about high school soccer because the Stars don't want their players involved with it
2) can't talk about ODP because the Stars don't want their players involved with it
3) can't talk about how clubs use social media because the Stars use it extensively
4) can't talk about coaches bullying their players because the Stars coaches aren't exactly warm and fuzzy guys
5) can't talk about college recruiting because the Stars don't do much to help their players with it
6) can't talk about travel and costs because the Stars teams travel the most and spend the most
7) can't talk about league issues because the Stars don't want people to understand where their "B" and "C" teams play
8) can't talk about the ECNL because the Stars are in it
9) can't talk about how much of a scam club soccer is because it conflicts with the Stars primary marketing message
10) can't talk about setting expectations objectively because then the Stars wouldn't have any customers
Instead we CAN talk about BTDT, elite college admissions, D3 soccer, and politics.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe amusing thing about your point of view is how hostile you are to ANY other message that doesn't neatly line up with what the Stars messages are. It is fine for the Stars to use talking-soccer and social media to spread their messages (ie no high school soccer) but if another club tries to spread a different message (NEFC's philosophy on recruiting) then you see it is a direct attack on the Stars and go to great lengths to shout it down. The reality here is this thread is just a DIFFERENT message and the other clubs have every right to spread theirs as the Stars do. Believe it or not the world of youth soccer doesn't start and end with the Stars. The Stars people can do what the heck they want, but they are not the largest club in the state at this point and the way that they do business is not what the majority of club soccer families in this state are apparently looking for other wise they WOULD be the largest. Time for a few of you to get off your high horses and accept that there is information other clubs want to get out to the soccer families in the state and that they have a right to do it. In other words STFU!!
The Stars might have the loudest voice on TS but they definitely do not represent the majority of soccer families in this state. Different clubs have very different opinions on how youth soccer should work and the Stars opinions aren't the only one that matters to the bulk of soccer families in this state. Just because one of them wishes to push their "agenda" that doesn't mean that it is an attack on the Stars.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Not BTDT but happy to have my posts attributed to him.
Basically validates the point I was making. Too far gone.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLatest Obama job approval polls, Perspective.
Associated Press
Approve 40% (can you believe that many still approve of the job this guy is doing?)
Disapprove 59%
ABC/Washington Post
Approve 39%
Disapprove 57%
Reuters
Approve 39%
Disapprove 53%
So tell me, Perspective, in 2009 when Obama had an approval rating high of 65%, did all those people now disaaproving your messiah turn racist in 5 years?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThese two posts encapsulate what many of us see. We are not sure who exactly is behind what message but it is pretty clear that anything that doesn't support the way the Stars look at things is viewed as an attack on them that must be squashed.
The Stars might have the loudest voice on TS but they definitely do not represent the majority of soccer families in this state. Different clubs have very different opinions on how youth soccer should work and the Stars opinions aren't the only one that matters to the bulk of soccer families in this state. Just because one of them wishes to push their "agenda" that doesn't mean that it is an attack on the Stars.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLoudest voice on TS? LOL. BTDT, you are a Prince of a guy. You are very openly attacking Stars every single day, for years, and they haven't done a thing to you. You are as vile as they get.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostProve it. Show where the guy has openly attacked the Stars. On the flip side we can all see that you attach every single thread that is pro for another club. Who is vile?
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAmusing how Perspective loves to pretend that the Stars don't have well known reputations for many things and how no one can talk about issues simply because that club has strong positions on certain issues.
1) can't talk about high school soccer because the Stars don't want their players involved with it
2) can't talk about ODP because the Stars don't want their players involved with it
3) can't talk about how clubs use social media because the Stars use it extensively
4) can't talk about coaches bullying their players because the Stars coaches aren't exactly warm and fuzzy guys
5) can't talk about college recruiting because the Stars don't do much to help their players with it
6) can't talk about travel and costs because the Stars teams travel the most and spend the most
7) can't talk about league issues because the Stars don't want people to understand where their "B" and "C" teams play
8) can't talk about the ECNL because the Stars are in it
9) can't talk about how much of a scam club soccer is because it conflicts with the Stars primary marketing message
10) can't talk about setting expectations objectively because then the Stars wouldn't have any customers
Instead we CAN talk about BTDT, elite college admissions, D3 soccer, and politics.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostReally, BTDT? You're holding the gun with blood all over it but you're still innocent? Here's one among thousands in just the last week, and you've been doing it non-stop with unimaginable relentless fervor for years.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostReally, what proof do you have? Prove your claims for once instead of continually making the usual accusations. In a court of law what you are claiming wouldn't even be allowed into the transcript because their is no proof behind any of it. You certainly aren't an expert witness who can offer an opinion based upon your interpretation of facts. There are no facts, just your opinions. Your opinion is biased and doesn't mean crap at this point because you obviously are deranged so you have no credibility.
And yes, I have proven that you are posting all of the time and with the same hate-filled themes over and over. I proven this hundreds of times. Have I ever misidentified a poster? Sure, but it's rare. It's ludicrous for you to even raise the "how do you know" question after your performance in recent days.
- Quote
Comment
Comment