Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
HS Girls 2019 Season
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe whole thing is a joke. Needs to be blown up and restructured. There are schools with over 1500 students playing in division 4 ???? So lopsided.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI know one school in D1 that scored 1 goal all year and I believe that was against a D4 team. Also couple times bully teams that like to pad stats beat them 16-0. That is a prime example for blowing it up.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt’s ridiculous. The matchups are a joke all season long. You’ve got blow out games and padding stats, and strong teams remaining in weak conferences.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSome version of a Walker system would at least give schools the incentive to play better opponents and when the seeding rolled around you might not see one side of the bracket look much more competitive than another side simply because only winning percentage was used.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post1. Revere (14-1-3) .861
2. Westford Academy (14-2-2) .833
3. Brookline (12-1-5) .805
4. Andover (12-3-3) .750
5. Lexington (11-4-3) .694
6. Central Catholic (10-4-3) .676
7. North Andover (10-5-3) .638
8. Acton-Boxborough (9-4-5) .638
9. Chelmsford (10-5-3) .638
10. Peabody (11-7-0) .611
11. Haverhill (9-7-1) .558
12. Lincoln-Sudbury (7-5-6) .555
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostA divisional system based on Stats, promotion and regulation, is the only way to go. Right now, it’s so far out of whack.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Posthttp://miaa.statebrackets.com/tmenu.cfm?tid=5413
Bracket Notes:
1. King Phillip (18-0-0) 1.000
2. Bishop Feehan (17-0-1) .972
3. Whitman Hanson (15-1-2) .889
4. Newton South (13-2-3) .806
5. Barnstable (11-2-2) .800
6. Natick (12-2-3) .794
7. Weymouth (13-3-4) .750
8. Oliver Ames (13-4-1) .750
9. Franklin (12-4-1) .735
10. Plymouth North (12-4-2) .722
11. Bridgewater-Raynham (11-4-3) .694
12. Needham (10-5-3) .639
13. Wellesley (8-5-3) .594
14. Braintree (8-7-3) .528
15. Marshfield (8-8-2) .500
16. Hingham (6-7-5) .472
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI'm taking Hingham, Needham, Franklin, and Newton South on one side of the bracket and Weymouth, Natick, Whitman-Hanson and Bishop Feehan on the other. 2019 will be seen as the year of huge upsets when it's all over.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCrazy talk. KP getting bounced like that isn't going to happen.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI'm taking Hingham, Needham, Franklin, and Newton South on one side of the bracket and Weymouth, Natick, Whitman-Hanson and Bishop Feehan on the other. 2019 will be seen as the year of huge upsets when it's all over.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post1. Revere (14-1-3) .861
2. Westford Academy (14-2-2) .833
3. Brookline (12-1-5) .805
4. Andover (12-3-3) .750
5. Lexington (11-4-3) .694
6. Central Catholic (10-4-3) .676
7. North Andover (10-5-3) .638
8. Acton-Boxborough (9-4-5) .638
9. Chelmsford (10-5-3) .638
10. Peabody (11-7-0) .611
11. Haverhill (9-7-1) .558
12. Lincoln-Sudbury (7-5-6) .555
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI'm taking Hingham, Needham, Franklin, and Newton South on one side of the bracket and Weymouth, Natick, Whitman-Hanson and Bishop Feehan on the other. 2019 will be seen as the year of huge upsets when it's all over.
- Quote
Comment
Comment