Announcement

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2015, 10:11 AM

I realize we're pretty early in the campaign, but I don't see how Mizz Hillary is going to survive. Obviously there will be people who will vote for her even if she is found standing over a dead body with a smoking gun, just like Obama, but she isn't going to get the black vote like Obama did and this certainly puts a monkey wrench in the Independent vote.

"April 22, 2015*
Gennifer Flowers.*Cattle futures. The White House*travel office. Rose Law Firm*files.*The Lincoln Bedroom.*Monica Lewinsky. And now, the Clinton Foundation. What ties these stories together is the predictable, paint-by-numbers response from the Bill and Hillary Clinton political operation.

1. Deny: Salient questions are dodged, and evidence goes missing. The stone wall is built.
2. Deflect: Blame is shifted, usually to Republicans and the media.
3. Demean: People who question or criticize the Clintons get tarred as right-wing extremists, hacks, nuts, or sluts.

http://www.nationaljournal.com/2016-...rnier-20150422

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2015, 10:16 AM

Et tu New York Times??? You gotta know that when the New York Times starts writing articles like this about a Democrat, it's bad, very bad.

"The headline in Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin�s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when the newspaper served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: �Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.�The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world�s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President*Bill Clinton*and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One."

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24..._r=0&referrer=

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2015, 10:58 AM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

I realize we're pretty early in the campaign, but I don't see how Mizz Hillary is going to survive. Obviously there will be people who will vote for her even if she is found standing over a dead body with a smoking gun, just like Obama, but she isn't going to get the black vote like Obama did and this certainly puts a monkey wrench in the Independent vote.

"April 22, 2015*
Gennifer Flowers.*Cattle futures. The White House*travel office. Rose Law Firm*files.*The Lincoln Bedroom.*Monica Lewinsky. And now, the Clinton Foundation. What ties these stories together is the predictable, paint-by-numbers response from the Bill and Hillary Clinton political operation.

1. Deny: Salient questions are dodged, and evidence goes missing. The stone wall is built.
2. Deflect: Blame is shifted, usually to Republicans and the media.
3. Demean: People who question or criticize the Clintons get tarred as right-wing extremists, hacks, nuts, or sluts.

http://www.nationaljournal.com/2016-...rnier-20150422

Nixonesque in their arrogance and hubris. Main stream media continues to be in the bag but in the new era of "news" the Clinton's are going to have difficult time controlling this onslaught. I just hope they don't treat her with kid gloves come debate time.

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2015, 12:02 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Nixonesque in their arrogance and hubris. Main stream media continues to be in the bag but in the new era of "news" the Clinton's are going to have difficult time controlling this onslaught. I just hope they don't treat her with kid gloves come debate time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoCWD_b4nvQ

"a new grandchild, a new hair style, a new email account....." Arrogance and hubris indeed.

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2015, 12:54 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Et tu New York Times??? You gotta know that when the New York Times starts writing articles like this about a Democrat, it's bad, very bad.

"The headline in Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin�s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when the newspaper served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: �Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.�The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world�s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President*Bill Clinton*and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One."

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24..._r=0&referrer=

The New York Times is suggesting Hillary Clinton took actions as secretary of state because of financial donations that were made to the Clinton Foundation by Russians pushing for a Canadian uranium company.
The Times reported on Thursday that Canadian records show the chairman of Russian-owned Uranium One gave over $2 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation, which the Clintons� didn�t disclose. At the same time, Russia pushed for control of a Canadian Uranium company.
A Kremlin-connected bank promoting stock in the company also reportedly paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech in Moscow. Eventually, the Russian-Canadian uranium deal was approved.

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2015, 08:01 PM

For Clintons, speech income shows how their wealth is intertwined with charity

Bill Clinton was paid at least $26*million in speaking fees by companies and organizations that are also major donors to the foundation he created after leaving the White House, according to a Washington Post analysis of public records and foundation data.The amount, about one-quarter of Clinton�s overall speaking income between 2001 and 2013, demonstrates how closely intertwined Bill and Hillary Clinton�s charitable work has become with their growing personal wealth.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...y.html?hpid=z3

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2015, 08:10 PM

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Hillary Clinton's family's charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters review found errors in how they reported donations from governments, and said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other errors.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/id...50423?irpc=932

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2015, 08:13 PM

The Federalist reports only 15% of the money donated to the Clinton Family Foundation went to actual charitable causes.* The bulk of the money donated to the Clinton Family Foundation went to travel, salaries, and benefits.* Sixty percent of all the money raised went to other expenses.*In other words, 85% of every dollar donated to the Clinton Foundation ended up either with the Clintons or with their staff to pay for travel, salaries, and benefits.*

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2015, 08:20 PM

"General Electric (GE) CEO Jeffrey Immelt said Wednesday that he will not release the emails that GE exchanged with Hillary Clinton�s State Department during the period in which GE was donating to the Clinton Foundation."

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/22/ge...rtment-emails/

Questions have been raised as to whether contributions to the Clinton Foundation by General Electric had anything to do with action taken by the State Department on GE�s behalf.There appears to be no dispute that in 2012, the State Department lobbied the Algerian government*in a successful effort to help GE obtain contracts to sell power plants to Algeria. Indeed, GE�s CEO, Jeff Immelt, seems to*admit as much, calling it standard practice for the U.S. government to provide help to U.S. companies trying to sell products abroad.The*National Center for Public Policy Research, citing the Wall Street Journal, says that �GE donated between $500,000 and $1 million to a health partnership with the Clinton Foundation,� and that �Clinton�s subsequent actions helped GE obtain a contract with the Algerian government to supply turbines for six power plants to the tune of $1.9 billion.�

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2015, 09:01 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Don't look now, but President Obama's approval rating are rising. Substantially. By the end, when historians consider the unprecedented amount of resistance he had to overcome, as well as the conditions he inherited, he will be considered a top 5 President of all time. Easily.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/0...n_7107934.html

Oopsy, new poll numbers out. Obama's RCP average going down.

Gallup 4/20 - 4/22, -6
Rasmussen Reports 4/20 - 4/22, -8
FOX News 4/19 - 4/21, -11

**header** · 04-23-2015, 09:21 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Oopsy, new poll numbers out. Obama's RCP average going down.

Gallup 4/20 - 4/22, -6
Rasmussen Reports 4/20 - 4/22, -8
FOX News 4/19 - 4/21, -11

Are you ready for Hillary? Me thinks she done before she got started. Let's see how msnbc spins this.

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2015, 05:24 AM

Democrats are a mess. Most transparent administration ever!

"Elizabeth Warren on Obama's trade deal: "He won't put the facts out*there" "

http://www.vox.com/2015/4/23/8482851...ama-tpp-secret