Friend said FCP is way better at developing talent. I had heard CU. FCP lets anyone in I thought?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which is better, FCP or CU ECNL?
Collapse
X
-
UnregisteredTags: None
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostFriend said FCP is way better at developing talent. I had heard CU. FCP lets anyone in I thought?
Regardless of player talent, if you can pay, a roster spot is granted.
W. Buffett
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostFriend said FCP is way better at developing talent. I had heard CU. FCP lets anyone in I thought?
If she's U14, U17, or U18/19 the coaching is clearly better at FCP. Can't beat the duo of DePinna and Gant.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe real answer is "it depends". If you're DD has the talent to play a ball-control, possession-centric style of soccer then choose FCP. If she's more of an athletic, speedster type then choose CU. If she has no talent, chooses Thornz.
If she's U14, U17, or U18/19 the coaching is clearly better at FCP. Can't beat the duo of DePinna and Gant.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSince the turn of the decade nearly every club tesm has been 'beating' this duo. You have a point.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSince the turn of the decade nearly every club tesm has been 'beating' this duo. You have a point.
What's it feel like to be a total loser there little lemming caveman? You all sad today? Your DD get cut from FCP's "C" team, again?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThere goes the Timbers lemming caveman again beating his hairy chest about wins at U-little while his club's girls teams fold up at U14 and FCP/CU keep putting dozens of girls in high level college soccer every year.
**I saw the #'s. GDA had more overall signees and equal D1. Then ECNL wants to argue that the players from GDA defected from ECNL and so they don't count when their own rosters are littered with OYSA club defectors. No amount propaganda will change these facts.
What's it feel like to be a total loser there little lemming caveman? You all sad today? Your DD get cut from FCP's "C" team, again?
The answer to this thread is obvious, CU far outshines FCP.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Up until this season, the obvious answer was FC with team success and players. Right now the obvious answer is CU.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI wouldn't know. FCP A- team art any age is a B team art the better OYSA clubs. Making the FCP ECNL has a low bar. Really all you need to be able to do is write the check.
The answer to this thread is obvious, CU far outshines FCP.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCrazy what was the change that gave CU a leg up on FCP?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThese things go in cycles. Always have. Just like the cycle of development at Alliance clubs: pick the big 'uns young, teach how to kick the ball long and hard, yell at them to win some piddly trophies at the Chinook Cup, and then watch the few with talent leave by U14 for CU or FCP. Must be maddening for the clowns running the Alliance clubs. But then again, they keep doing it the same way every year so maybe that's all they know.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIf the "best" have been snatched by the DA why are they still so horrible. The scoreboard for the year is pathetic.
Stick with HS and neighborhood club soccer. It suits you.
- Quote
Comment
Comment