The question: Will the US Soccer Girls Development Academy even be relevant at the U17/U18 age level for the vast majority of the players?
If the target audience for the US Soccer GDA is the elite level player that they are identifying and developing for YNTs and WNT what's in it for the 17/18 year old player that hasn't been selected for national team duty?
-If so very few of the pool are selected for YNT/WNT duty - less than 1% - why would the other 99% stick around?
-If a players goal is to play in college and they're not YNT/WNT quality why would they stick around?
-If a player is committed to a college and they're not a YNT/WNT prospect why would they stick around?
-If a player is not YNT/WNT quality and they want to play for their HS and community why would they stick around?
-If a player is not YNT/WNT quality why would a parent continue to fund their DDs GDA expense?
There's a huge potential that the U17/18 GDA could see a mass exit (especially at U18) once players realize that they are not YNT/WNT quality and they have other priorities that they value more.
The ECNL has recognized some of these issues and has "lightened" the load for the older player. Less expense as they are only required to play in one national show case and league games. Roughly a 50% reduction in cost as compared to U16 and U17 age groups.
It will be interesting to see if the older age group, 99%+, sees the value of the GDA.
We'll have to wait a few years to find out ... but looking at how things have played out historically ... the GDA is going to have slim pickings at the older ages given their restrictive requirements.
If the target audience for the US Soccer GDA is the elite level player that they are identifying and developing for YNTs and WNT what's in it for the 17/18 year old player that hasn't been selected for national team duty?
-If so very few of the pool are selected for YNT/WNT duty - less than 1% - why would the other 99% stick around?
-If a players goal is to play in college and they're not YNT/WNT quality why would they stick around?
-If a player is committed to a college and they're not a YNT/WNT prospect why would they stick around?
-If a player is not YNT/WNT quality and they want to play for their HS and community why would they stick around?
-If a player is not YNT/WNT quality why would a parent continue to fund their DDs GDA expense?
There's a huge potential that the U17/18 GDA could see a mass exit (especially at U18) once players realize that they are not YNT/WNT quality and they have other priorities that they value more.
The ECNL has recognized some of these issues and has "lightened" the load for the older player. Less expense as they are only required to play in one national show case and league games. Roughly a 50% reduction in cost as compared to U16 and U17 age groups.
It will be interesting to see if the older age group, 99%+, sees the value of the GDA.
We'll have to wait a few years to find out ... but looking at how things have played out historically ... the GDA is going to have slim pickings at the older ages given their restrictive requirements.
Comment