Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bob Bradley - The Yesterday Man

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Bob Bradley - The Yesterday Man

    Bob Bradley - The Yesterday Man


    By Paul Gardner

    Another reprehensible evening for Bob Bradley and the U.S. national team at the New Meadowlands Stadium. Not as bad as last year's feeble surrender to Brazil, but bad enough.

    Of course, a 1-1 tie with Argentina looks like a respectable scoreline, but don’t be fooled. For most of this game, the USA was thoroughly outplayed. Against Brazil, goalkeeper Brad Guzan was voted (by whom?) Man of the Match -- even though he played only 45 minutes. This time Tim Howard got the award, and that tells you everything. The USA still relies heavily on its goalkeepers to stave off embarrassing defeats.

    Bradley has now had more than six months in charge in his second spell. That’s ample time to show evidence of a new approach, something fresh, some new and different players, at least an attempt to change the pattern of his college-game thinking.

    But nothing has changed, not a thing. This is still a team without style, a team that has nothing better than craven defense to offer in a home game against a strong opponent.

    Of course, Bradley denied that. In his well-orchestrated, coach-friendly post-game press conference, he said it wasn’t the USA’s intention to play defensively in the first half, but that Argentina had found its rhythm so quickly that the USA had been forced into a defensive mode.

    Oh, really. A team that takes the field with one guy up front, that abjectly retreats into its own half en masse whenever the opponents get the ball, that is so obviously looking for the quick counter, right from the start ... a team with the evident intention of getting through to halftime with a 0-0 scoreline -- this is not a team with a defensive mindset?

    The game started with Michael Bradley, unchallenged, hitting a cross-field pass ... that went straight into touch. That was not an aberration. The quality of the U.S. passing, particularly out of the back, was atrocious. Jay DeMerit and Carlos Bocanegra are players whose time has come and gone.

    OK, Omar Gonzalez was not available, but is he then the only young replacement? We might have got a look at Tim Ream -- after all, he plays just down the road for the Red Bulls -- but, no, that was evidently considered too risky. So yesterday’s players soldiered crudely on.

    Oguchi Onyewu, once a lively, skillful outside back has been turned -- by his coaches, who else? -- into a lumbering, physical center back of doubtful quality. We did get something new defensively when Timothy Chandler came on in the second half -- replacing Jonathan Spector -- the least worrying of the U.S. defenders. But Chandler is not an American-produced player.

    Chandler, along with the other second-half sub, Red Bull Juan Agudelo, made a difference, for sure -- it was a difference that they could, presumably, have made much earlier ... had Bradley been willing to start them in a less defensive formation. Too risky, no doubt.

    In midfield, the best-ever American player, Landon Donovan, had a totally vapid game. We can blame Donovan -- or should we blame the coach who sends him out in a formation that seemed almost designed to negate Donovan’s undoubted playmaking skills? Jermaine Jones made but one memorable contribution by scything down Lionel Messi.

    Clint Dempsey did well enough, under these negative conditions (negative conditions imposed by his own coach, not by the Argentines), while Maurice Edu showed himself, yet again, to be nothing more than the sort of physical enforcer that Bradley admires in midfield. As for Jozy Altidore, the lone stranger up front -- what chance did he have?

    Bob Bradley, good old Banality Bob, let fly with the banalities post-game. This game was all good for the USA, it was good for the players to experience the quick way that Argentina moves the ball, the USA’s responses were good, it was a good result against a good opponent. Good, good, good. Good grief! -- but there was more goodness to come.

    Asked about Agudelo, Bradley made the standard remark about Agudelo “putting himself into good positions” (is Agudelo auditioning for a role in Kama Sutra, the Musical -- or a place on the national team?) and then commented that he had a “good attitude about working on little things ...”

    We’ve been listening to this twaddle about little things for over four years now. How about working on some of the big things, Bob? Like developing a passing game? Something that might mean that goalscoring moves begin to look like a natural part of the USA’s play. That would be a welcome relief from the reliance on smash-and-grab counters or -- as in this game -- on a set-play and a goalkeeper error?

    A statistical comment -- one that also tells us a lot about Bradley’s player selection. On the USA’s 18-man roster, only two players -- Donovan and Jonathan Bornstein -- were less than 6 feet tall. Argentina, with a 24-man roster, had 15 players under 6 feet.

    Among those 15, the smallest player on the field, the little genius Messi, with his shining, lapidary skills. The contrast between the beautiful artistry of Messi and the sheer lubberly ordinariness of Bradley’s defenders was utterly embarrassing.

    Of course, Bradley knows all about Messi, he explained to us about his quick little passes, and his delayed darting runs with the tedious, bloodless detail of a technician who’s been studying the tapes ad nauseam. Defending Messi? Bradley has it all worked out, it means stopping that final pass, either from him, or to him. Sounds simple and clean. No doubt. But mostly it translated as “safety in numbers” -- surrounding Messi with a posse of defenders and simply crowding him out.

    Which worked -- up to a point. Messi simply bamboozled everyone with his marvelous dribble that led to Argentina’s goal. And he was unfortunate to be called back in the 63rd minute when he was in the process of ghosting past everyone -- as the referee whistled too early to give Argentina a free kick they could have done without.

    Next, it’s Paraguay. Mexico showed, on Saturday, that free-flowing attacking soccer can beat Paraguay. Will Bradley opt for that? Is he capable of even entertaining such an idea? Will he take the risks, which are not that great, of sitting the old guys down and starting the youngsters? Bradley says he is thinking about it.

    More than thinking is needed now. Without some evidence -- and we’ve had none so far -- that he is willing to be much more adventurous, Bradley has no future with this team, and the team has no future with Bradley in charge.

    #2
    Originally posted by thebes20 View Post
    Bob Bradley - The Yesterday Man


    By Paul Gardner

    Another reprehensible evening for Bob Bradley and the U.S. national team at the New Meadowlands Stadium. Not as bad as last year's feeble surrender to Brazil, but bad enough.

    Of course, a 1-1 tie with Argentina looks like a respectable scoreline, but don’t be fooled. For most of this game, the USA was thoroughly outplayed. Against Brazil, goalkeeper Brad Guzan was voted (by whom?) Man of the Match -- even though he played only 45 minutes. This time Tim Howard got the award, and that tells you everything. The USA still relies heavily on its goalkeepers to stave off embarrassing defeats.

    Bradley has now had more than six months in charge in his second spell. That’s ample time to show evidence of a new approach, something fresh, some new and different players, at least an attempt to change the pattern of his college-game thinking.

    But nothing has changed, not a thing. This is still a team without style, a team that has nothing better than craven defense to offer in a home game against a strong opponent.

    Of course, Bradley denied that. In his well-orchestrated, coach-friendly post-game press conference, he said it wasn’t the USA’s intention to play defensively in the first half, but that Argentina had found its rhythm so quickly that the USA had been forced into a defensive mode.

    Oh, really. A team that takes the field with one guy up front, that abjectly retreats into its own half en masse whenever the opponents get the ball, that is so obviously looking for the quick counter, right from the start ... a team with the evident intention of getting through to halftime with a 0-0 scoreline -- this is not a team with a defensive mindset?

    The game started with Michael Bradley, unchallenged, hitting a cross-field pass ... that went straight into touch. That was not an aberration. The quality of the U.S. passing, particularly out of the back, was atrocious. Jay DeMerit and Carlos Bocanegra are players whose time has come and gone.

    OK, Omar Gonzalez was not available, but is he then the only young replacement? We might have got a look at Tim Ream -- after all, he plays just down the road for the Red Bulls -- but, no, that was evidently considered too risky. So yesterday’s players soldiered crudely on.

    Oguchi Onyewu, once a lively, skillful outside back has been turned -- by his coaches, who else? -- into a lumbering, physical center back of doubtful quality. We did get something new defensively when Timothy Chandler came on in the second half -- replacing Jonathan Spector -- the least worrying of the U.S. defenders. But Chandler is not an American-produced player.

    Chandler, along with the other second-half sub, Red Bull Juan Agudelo, made a difference, for sure -- it was a difference that they could, presumably, have made much earlier ... had Bradley been willing to start them in a less defensive formation. Too risky, no doubt.

    In midfield, the best-ever American player, Landon Donovan, had a totally vapid game. We can blame Donovan -- or should we blame the coach who sends him out in a formation that seemed almost designed to negate Donovan’s undoubted playmaking skills? Jermaine Jones made but one memorable contribution by scything down Lionel Messi.

    Clint Dempsey did well enough, under these negative conditions (negative conditions imposed by his own coach, not by the Argentines), while Maurice Edu showed himself, yet again, to be nothing more than the sort of physical enforcer that Bradley admires in midfield. As for Jozy Altidore, the lone stranger up front -- what chance did he have?

    Bob Bradley, good old Banality Bob, let fly with the banalities post-game. This game was all good for the USA, it was good for the players to experience the quick way that Argentina moves the ball, the USA’s responses were good, it was a good result against a good opponent. Good, good, good. Good grief! -- but there was more goodness to come.

    Asked about Agudelo, Bradley made the standard remark about Agudelo “putting himself into good positions” (is Agudelo auditioning for a role in Kama Sutra, the Musical -- or a place on the national team?) and then commented that he had a “good attitude about working on little things ...”

    We’ve been listening to this twaddle about little things for over four years now. How about working on some of the big things, Bob? Like developing a passing game? Something that might mean that goalscoring moves begin to look like a natural part of the USA’s play. That would be a welcome relief from the reliance on smash-and-grab counters or -- as in this game -- on a set-play and a goalkeeper error?

    A statistical comment -- one that also tells us a lot about Bradley’s player selection. On the USA’s 18-man roster, only two players -- Donovan and Jonathan Bornstein -- were less than 6 feet tall. Argentina, with a 24-man roster, had 15 players under 6 feet.

    Among those 15, the smallest player on the field, the little genius Messi, with his shining, lapidary skills. The contrast between the beautiful artistry of Messi and the sheer lubberly ordinariness of Bradley’s defenders was utterly embarrassing.

    Of course, Bradley knows all about Messi, he explained to us about his quick little passes, and his delayed darting runs with the tedious, bloodless detail of a technician who’s been studying the tapes ad nauseam. Defending Messi? Bradley has it all worked out, it means stopping that final pass, either from him, or to him. Sounds simple and clean. No doubt. But mostly it translated as “safety in numbers” -- surrounding Messi with a posse of defenders and simply crowding him out.

    Which worked -- up to a point. Messi simply bamboozled everyone with his marvelous dribble that led to Argentina’s goal. And he was unfortunate to be called back in the 63rd minute when he was in the process of ghosting past everyone -- as the referee whistled too early to give Argentina a free kick they could have done without.

    Next, it’s Paraguay. Mexico showed, on Saturday, that free-flowing attacking soccer can beat Paraguay. Will Bradley opt for that? Is he capable of even entertaining such an idea? Will he take the risks, which are not that great, of sitting the old guys down and starting the youngsters? Bradley says he is thinking about it.

    More than thinking is needed now. Without some evidence -- and we’ve had none so far -- that he is willing to be much more adventurous, Bradley has no future with this team, and the team has no future with Bradley in charge.
    Both our men's and women's programs have so much more to offer, what a shame. Some day starting with youth, college, ODP programs and national teams the old school will exit. Until then...

    Comment


      #3
      We sit and bash everyone when things do not work in our favor..... This is totally wrong. Time and time again we hear that we do not possess the artistry and flair and tactical awareness of our counterparts from whatever foreign land they come from and then turn around and blame the coach for under developing and not teaching them the same tactics our opponents use against us. Let me tell you something, we are strangled by the players that we have. We can only do as good as the bodies we produce. The old cliche "we are only as good as the hand we are dealt." Its the players that should account for majority of how we play, because at the end of the day the coach can state and demand that they execute exactly what he wants and its another for the players to follow through. Yes we struggle to get forward. Yes we don't finish well. Yes we lack flair, but try not to place all the blame on coach. If we hired the German Dude we would still struggle. Look at it that we are competing at the highest level and trying to compete. There are somethings that we are simply not ELITE at and soccer falls into that category.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        We sit and bash everyone when things do not work in our favor..... This is totally wrong. Time and time again we hear that we do not possess the artistry and flair and tactical awareness of our counterparts from whatever foreign land they come from and then turn around and blame the coach for under developing and not teaching them the same tactics our opponents use against us. Let me tell you something, we are strangled by the players that we have. We can only do as good as the bodies we produce. The old cliche "we are only as good as the hand we are dealt." Its the players that should account for majority of how we play, because at the end of the day the coach can state and demand that they execute exactly what he wants and its another for the players to follow through. Yes we struggle to get forward. Yes we don't finish well. Yes we lack flair, but try not to place all the blame on coach. If we hired the German Dude we would still struggle. Look at it that we are competing at the highest level and trying to compete. There are somethings that we are simply not ELITE at and soccer falls into that category.
        Good point. Also, let's remember that these players are only with this coach periodically. Most of their time is spent with their club teams. Therefore, if the players are not being properly developed, it is more the fault of the club coaches.

        Comment


          #5
          Sorry but I dont think so.

          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          If we hired the German Dude we would still struggle. Look at it that we are competing at the highest level and trying to compete. There are somethings that we are simply not ELITE at and soccer falls into that category.
          I whole heartedly disagree with this observation. Had we hired Jurgen Klinsmann, he would have dismantled our entire National Team selection process. Our Developmental Academies would have true leadership and goals. I can guarandamtee you that the majority of our National team would have much more last names which end in "ez" than "son"

          The "old" guard in the USSF needs to go including Sunil Gulati. Bob Bradley might have gotten an extension, but I can see this guy getting cut mid term so Gulati can save his butt.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            We sit and bash everyone when things do not work in our favor..... This is totally wrong. Time and time again we hear that we do not possess the artistry and flair and tactical awareness of our counterparts from whatever foreign land they come from and then turn around and blame the coach for under developing and not teaching them the same tactics our opponents use against us. Let me tell you something, we are strangled by the players that we have. We can only do as good as the bodies we produce. The old cliche "we are only as good as the hand we are dealt." Its the players that should account for majority of how we play, because at the end of the day the coach can state and demand that they execute exactly what he wants and its another for the players to follow through. Yes we struggle to get forward. Yes we don't finish well. Yes we lack flair, but try not to place all the blame on coach. If we hired the German Dude we would still struggle. Look at it that we are competing at the highest level and trying to compete. There are somethings that we are simply not ELITE at and soccer falls into that category.
            The players that are being selected big, strong, fast vrs technical skill, speed of play, tactical awareness etc. etc. shows where the true problem lies. It is not the players that make these dicisions. Your statement reflects the hurdles that we have to overcome!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              We sit and bash everyone when things do not work in our favor..... This is totally wrong. Time and time again we hear that we do not possess the artistry and flair and tactical awareness of our counterparts from whatever foreign land they come from and then turn around and blame the coach for under developing and not teaching them the same tactics our opponents use against us. Let me tell you something, we are strangled by the players that we have. We can only do as good as the bodies we produce. The old cliche "we are only as good as the hand we are dealt." Its the players that should account for majority of how we play, because at the end of the day the coach can state and demand that they execute exactly what he wants and its another for the players to follow through. Yes we struggle to get forward. Yes we don't finish well. Yes we lack flair, but try not to place all the blame on coach. If we hired the German Dude we would still struggle. Look at it that we are competing at the highest level and trying to compete. There are somethings that we are simply not ELITE at and soccer falls into that category.
              For the most part I disagree with you. If we had hired Gus Hiddink for instance we definitely would have more flair. He did it with Australia. They didn't have any flair. There are coaches out there, such as Klinnsman, who would overhaul the system and selection process. Of course the dead weight that is Sunil Gulati would never allow this.
              We should criticize Bradley. The buck stops with him. If your food was bad at a restaurant the waiter hears the criticism, not the chef in the kitchen.
              It is unacceptable at this point for our nation to be playing this type of soccer. Yes we are decades behind the big soccer nations, but we are still one of the biggest nations in the world with the most resources. Last time I checked soccer was the biggest youth sport in the country. If you don't believe me go out to one of the big clubs one Saturday morning. I was amazed when I got involved in it 10 years ago. I didn't think this was a soccer country even though I played H.S. We made tremendous gains in the 1980's and 1990's and now we have stagnated. We will continue to stagnate until things change in the youth game and in the upper crust of US soccer.
              Our youth game does not emphasize ball skills enough at an early age (please see page 2 of thread "Whats Wrong With American Soccer"). We scrimmage too much, we play too many tournaments to win and we do not nurture and develop the really skilfull players. We hog them up for our U12 team even though they could get better experience playing a couple of ages up or being exposed to different coaches. We choose ball winning type players in our midfield positions because we want to win meaningless youth tournaments. These types of players win the ball and then often give it right back so there is never a cohesive passing game or style of play that develops like in Holland or Brazil.
              As I see it our back line absolutely sucks. We have never had anything like a world-class defender, EVER!! Gooch sucks. He may be good in the air but his distribution looks like a Div. II college womens game. DeMeritt, nice guy, great story, but a guy who is a national team starter? We can do much better. Bornstein, good crosses, some speed, but can't we find better? Bocanegra is solid but he will soon be gone.
              Our midfield is good - adequate mostly - but why Jermaine Jones (or Ricardo Clark) and Michael Bradley at the same time unless you need cover for your back line in a 4-2-3-1?
              Altidore has lost the plot up front. He dribbles too much. As a center forward you should find the space and after one touch, take a strike or lay it off. Also his confidence is down. We need to find a consistent goal scorer. Don't put too much on this 18 year old kid too soon even though he looks good.

              Comment

              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
              Auto-Saved
              x
              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
              x
              Working...
              X