Democrats = Hypocrites

[Unregistered]

As if we needed any more proof libtards are a bunch of hypocritical pusssies, they're actually calling Trump a "terrorist" for picking on Pelosi over hairgate. Funny how the left can't take the heat. It's so pathetic, they actually brought up the homeless problem to deflect from the embarrassment. For 4 years libtards couldn't "move on" from Russia, but after 1 week of terrible optics of Pelosi, they've had enough. Boo-Hoo!

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san...on-controversy

The mayor of San Francisco on Friday called Trump a “terrorist” as she defended House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over her controversial salon visit, saying it was time to “move on.”

"I'm just saying that to allow an issue like this to turn our city upside down when we got folks who are homeless, we've got people who can't open their business, including these salons. I understand," she said.

"I get that they have these feelings, they are voicing their feelings, but we are doing the very best we can and I know that's not good enough for them, I understand," she said. "I get it, but at the end of the day, it is really time for us to move on."

[Unregistered]

“Residents are asking, ‘Where are the police?’”

Ya think? This is what happens when emotion takes over reason. How freaking stupid are these libtard council people? Did they really not see this coming? You play stupid games, you get stupid prizes!

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/min...und-the-police

Minneapolis City Council alarmed by surge in crime months after voting to defund the police

Minneapolis City Council members, who just two months ago moved to eliminate the police department, sounded the alarm during a Wednesday meeting about a surge in crime seen by their constituents.

Council members pressed police Chief Medaria Arradondo about the uptick in crimes that included daylight carjackings, robberies, assaults, shootings and street racing.

“Residents are asking, ‘Where are the police?’” said Council Member Jamal Osman, noting that constituents' calls to the Minneapolis Police Department have gone unanswered. "That is the only public safety option they have at the moment. MPD. They rely on MPD. And they are saying they are nowhere to be seen.”

The Minneapolis Police Department’s crime data shows a rise in assaults, robberies and homicides, as well as property crimes and arson, according to Minnesota Public Radio. More people have been killed in the city in the first nine months of 2020 than those slain in all of last year.

Arradondo said about 100 officers have left the department or have taken a leave of absence since the start of the year, which is more than double the typical number of officers who either step down from the department or are inactive that year, MPR reported.

[Unregistered]

If Biden would impose an mandatory nationwide mask order for all US citizens, I wonder how the anti-vaccine folks would feel about a mandatory nationwide vaccine order for all Americans? You think that would never happen? Get ready. Who would have thought America would one day be a socialist country. Careful what you wish for!

[Unregistered]

If Biden would impose an mandatory nationwide mask order for all US citizens, I wonder how the anti-vaccine folks would feel about a mandatory nationwide vaccine order for all Americans? You think that would never happen? Get ready. Who would have thought America would one day be a socialist country. Careful what you wish for!

Thank you for admitting that you believe trump will lose the election. Confession is the first step toward recovery. Help your friends see the light, please.

[Unregistered]

Thank you for admitting that you believe trump will lose the election. Confession is the first step toward recovery. Help your friends see the light, please.

Education is the first step to combat stupidity. :)

/if/
conjunction
conjunction: if

1.
(introducing a conditional clause) on the condition or supposition that; in the event that.
"if you have a complaint, write to the director"

[Unregistered]

If Biden would impose an mandatory nationwide mask order for all US citizens, I wonder how the anti-vaccine folks would feel about a mandatory nationwide vaccine order for all Americans? You think that would never happen? Get ready. Who would have thought America would one day be a socialist country. Careful what you wish for!

You cons really don't understand the differences between various political and economic structures.

[Unregistered]

Much like Hiden Biden, the founders of BLM have align themselves with communist China. To think that democrats support groups funded by a communist national is just about the pinnacle of hypocrisy. The Biden family has made millions off of their China partnership and now the Democrats #1 “social justice” terror organization is funded by China. You just know Trump is laughing his ass off right about now! But Trump is bad. 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑

Look at this news article from The Daily Caller: Black Lives Matter Co-Founder’s New Org Sponsored By Group That Raised China’s Communist Flag Over Boston City Hall

Black Lives Matter co-founder Alicia Garza’s new organization, Black Futures Lab, is fiscally sponsored by the Chinese Progressive Association, which organized the raising of communist China’s flag over Boston City Hall last year.

The “donate” button on Black Futures Lab’s website takes users to a donation page hosted by the CPA, which notes that “Black Futures Lab is a fiscally sponsored project of the Chinese Progressive Association.” The partnership between the two groups was first reported by the Daily Signal on Tuesday.

The CPA last year sponsored the raising of the Chinese flag over Boston City Hall to mark the 70th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party creating the People’s Republic of China. The event sparked a protest from demonstrators opposed to the Chinese government’s actions in Hong Kong, 7News Boston reported at the time. (RELATED: WaPo, NYT Aiding China’s Global Propaganda Efforts, Watchdog

Black Futures Lab “is focused on collaborating with Black people, Black elected officials, and Black community-based organizations to build progressive political and legislative power in order to get us closer to having the communities and political power we deserve,” according to its website. Garza launched the organization in 2018.

Garza is a vocal opponent of American-style capitalism. She said in a 2015 speech that capitalism needs to be abolished in order for black lives to matter.

One of Garza’s fellow co-founders of Black Lives Matter, Patrisse Cullors, described herself and Garza as “trained Marxists” in 2015 as well.

“Myself and Alicia in particular are trained organizers. We are trained Marxists. We are super-versed on, sort of, ideological theories,” Cullors said.

[Unregistered]

I thought Trump was the only one making up stuff and lying to us. Well, it seems even the WaPo and Politico say Biden is full of shît. How are we supposed to trust a president who lies to the American people? Wow, I’m starting to sound like a libtard. 😂. Out of all the world leaders it seems Trump is the only one responsible for every death!

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bid...l-people-alive

Joe Biden*indicated during*a CNN town hall Thursday that*President Trump*is responsible for every single*coronavirus*death.

"If the president had done his job...*had done his job from the beginning, all the people would still be alive," the Democratic presidential nominee told the audience in Pennsylvania. "All the people --*I’m not making this up. Just look at the data. Look at the data."

Meanwhile, The Washington Post exclaimed Biden "is making this up."

"There is no data to support this, even if the president had moved rapidly in January to deal with the coronavirus and been able to persuade the Chinese leadership to be more forthcoming about the situation," the paper reported.

Politico said the former vice president "vastly overstated what protections could have worked against the virus."

"Yes, he was responsible for their preexisting conditions," one user wrote.

[Unregistered]

Biden’s truth problem

It seems Biden is having a hard time being honest with the American people. Not only is
Biden struggling with his thoughts, he is now struggling with telling the truth. Not a good look after libtards having been accusing Trump of the same thing. Now CNN is calling him out’

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden falsely claimed that President Donald Trump held the Bible upside down when he stood outside St. John’s Church.

Biden made the comments during Thursday’s drive-in style town hall on CNN, referencing the president’s surprise visit to the church in June after several nights of protests and riots had left the church and other nearby buildings vandalized and burned.

But CNN’s own fact-checker Daniel Dale responded to Biden’s claim about the Bible, saying that it was, in fact, false. He also noted that Trump went to the bunker several days earlier, not the day of his visit to Lafayette Square.

“Biden is wrong that Trump held the Bible upside down at St. John’s church. (This has become a weirdly widespread belief, but it’s incorrect.) And Trump didn’t go to the church and then to the White House bunker, as Biden suggested; he went to the bunker three days prior,” Dale tweeted.

[Unregistered]

More lies from Biden

It seems Biden is having a hard time being honest with the American people. Not only is
Biden struggling with his thoughts, he is now struggling with telling the truth. Not a good look after libtards having been accusing Trump of the same thing. Now CNN is calling him out’

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden falsely claimed that President Donald Trump held the Bible upside down when he stood outside St. John’s Church.

Biden made the comments during Thursday’s drive-in style town hall on CNN, referencing the president’s surprise visit to the church in June after several nights of protests and riots had left the church and other nearby buildings vandalized and burned.

But CNN’s own fact-checker Daniel Dale responded to Biden’s claim about the Bible, saying that it was, in fact, false. He also noted that Trump went to the bunker several days earlier, not the day of his visit to Lafayette Square.

“Biden is wrong that Trump held the Bible upside down at St. John’s church. (This has become a weirdly widespread belief, but it’s incorrect.) And Trump didn’t go to the church and then to the White House bunker, as Biden suggested; he went to the bunker three days prior,” Dale tweeted.

It’s pretty apparent Biden has problem with the truth. This guy has been lying for months and is continually being fact checked and corrected even by the liberal media. Pretty ironic since libtards have been saying the same thing about Trump. You would think Dems would have picked a candidate with some integrity.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/polit...urg/index.html

Fact check: Biden falsely claims Trump campaign only asked him for Supreme Court list after Ruth Bader Ginsburg died

Washington (CNN)Former Vice President Joe Biden made false claims in a Sunday speech in which he urged Senate Republicans to let the winner of the presidential election fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Friday.

Biden argued that it would be inappropriate for him to release a list of prospective Supreme Court nominees, as Trump did during the 2016 campaign and did again this month.
Biden also claimed that the Trump campaign had not asked him to release such a list until after Ginsburg died.

Facts First: This is just wrong. The Trump campaign and Trump himself had repeatedly said prior to Ginsburg's death that Biden should release a list of prospective Supreme Court nominees.

To bolster his case that the Senate should wait to confirm the next justice, Biden said: "By the way, there's no court session between now and the end of this election."

Facts First: Biden's claim is simply inaccurate. The court's next session is scheduled to begin on October 5, nearly a month before Election Day on November 3.

[Unregistered]

Really cons? Complaining about Dems being hypocrits when the death of RBG shows the true colors of the GOP?

2016 = no SCOTUS hearings in an election year. Let the voters decide.

2020 = full speed ahead on SCOTUS, voters' wishes be dammed.

What a bunch of 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

[Unregistered]

Really cons? Complaining about Dems being hypocrits when the death of RBG shows the true colors of the GOP?

2016 = no SCOTUS hearings in an election year. Let the voters decide.

2020 = full speed ahead on SCOTUS, voters' wishes be dammed.

What a bunch of 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

Really libtards?

Trying to impeach and remove this president for the last four years because you could never accept the results of the 2016election.

Trying to to destroy the life of the last SCOTUS nominee

Threatening to impeach the president again for doing his job just like Obama did right before the last election

Threatening to expand the Supreme Court just to “stacked judges” to favor your side

Elections have consequences and you guys lost. Yet, you libtards have tried in vain to circumvent that election and the will of the people. Do really expect us to believe that Dems would to the exact same thing? You wanna him impeached for holding up a weather map for fûck sake. Yeah, you know you will lose that argument every time. Spare us the fake outrage and drama.

[Unregistered]

Trying to impeach and remove this president for the last four years because you could never accept the results of the 2016election..

Dredging up this tired old narrative again? Even Hillary accepted the 2016 election results. He was impeached and should have been removed for withholding congressionally approved security assistance to another nation to extort fabricated oppo research against his political opponent. Virtually every legal scholar agrees this was an impeachable and removable offense.

Trying to to destroy the life of the last SCOTUS nominee

Tried to prevent a candidate who was woefully unqualified, a likely rapist, and unable to control his temper from attaining a lifetime SCOTUS appointment.

Threatening to impeach the president again for doing his job just like Obama did right before the last election

Doing his job? You're either hopelessly brainwashed or completely retarded.

Threatening to expand the Supreme Court just to “stacked judges” to favor your side.

Laughable, considering the shameless hypocrisy of McConnell, Graham, and dozens of other cowardly GOP sheep who are unable to put country over party, and are shamelessly stacking the court on THEIR side.

Elections have consequences and you guys lost.

You must have been in drug rehab during the 2018 election. A historic rout for the Republican party.

"It is important for the Senate to give the people a voice in the filling of this vacancy by waiting until the next president takes office."
- Mitch McConnell, in 2016, refusing to take a vote on Obama's SCOTUS nominee

"President Trump’s nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate"
- Mitch McConnell, in 2020

Such shameless hypocrisy has no equal in modern political history. You trumpsters no longer have the right to accuse democrats of hypocrisy.

[Unregistered]

Dredging up this tired old narrative again? Even Hillary accepted the 2016 election results. He was impeached and should have been removed for withholding congressionally approved security assistance to another nation to extort fabricated oppo research against his political opponent. Virtually every legal scholar agrees this was an impeachable and removable offense.


Tried to prevent a candidate who was woefully unqualified, a likely rapist, and unable to control his temper from attaining a lifetime SCOTUS appointment.

Doing his job? You're either hopelessly brainwashed or completely retarded.


Laughable, considering the shameless hypocrisy of McConnell, Graham, and dozens of other cowardly GOP sheep who are unable to put country over party, and are shamelessly stacking the court on THEIR side.


You must have been in drug rehab during the 2018 election. A historic rout for the Republican party.

"It is important for the Senate to give the people a voice in the filling of this vacancy by waiting until the next president takes office."
- Mitch McConnell, in 2016, refusing to take a vote on Obama's SCOTUS nominee

"President Trump’s nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate"
- Mitch McConnell, in 2020

Such shameless hypocrisy has no equal in modern political history. You trumpsters no longer have the right to accuse democrats of hypocrisy.

You’re so precious!

I seem to recall you libtards wanted to impeach him over Russia collusion too. Remember that 2+ year investigation? How could you forget the whole Russian agent bullshît. Conveniently you seem to omit that part. Wonder why? Not to forget calls for impeachment over Stormy, Emoluments Clauses, high crimes and misdemeanors, and weather maps. Once again the problem with your lame Ukraine argument is that when it came time to prove the case what happened? “I presumed” was the star witness testimony. Hmm, we had the transcript and a bunch of witnesses that couldn’t provide real evidence to refute it. That’s why he’s still in office because we don’t remove presidents over presumptions, “gut feelings”, opinions, and conjecture. Once again, Dems acted on emotion which is to be expected since they called for his impeachment on his Inauguration Day.

Again, let’s examine your argument to see the underline theme. “Likely rapist” unable to control his anger. Where’s the proof? Because Dr Ford said it happened, well so did Tara Reade but you didn’t believe her, did you? You see where we’re going with this. We don’t prevent appointments based on presumptions, “gut feelings, opinions, and conjecture. It’s very “likely” you’re a complete *********. See how that works. Dems tried to destroy the mans life over politics. It had nothing to do with him and you know it.

President Obama appointed Judge Garland during an election year. I never once heard you speak out against it. In Obama’s own words, he was “fulfilling his duties” by picking Garland. Gee no libtard outrage at all. Unfortunately for you, Dems lost the Senate and he didn’t get picked. Are you gonna sit here and try to convince us that the Dems would have confirmed Cavanaugh if the Dems controlled the Senate? You’re a special kind of stupid if you do.

Elections have consequences and America spoke. Trump won and Republicans kept the Senate. We didn’t meltdown and have a temper tantrum when we lost the house. Yet Dems wanna change the rules because they can’t seem to win otherwise. From getting rid of the filibuster to expanding the SCOTUS in order to stack the court in their favor. Really? You wanna bring up “shamelessly”? How bout this. How bout Trump wins the election then decides to “expand” the court then appoint 2-3 more conservative judges. How would you libtatds take that? You guys are playing with Fire.

Since you wanna quote people’s past comments, let’s take a look what tune Obama, Biden, and Ginsberg were singing back in 2016, shall we.

But in 2016, when a lame-duck President Obama tabbed Merrick Garland to replace the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, Democratic leaders had no problem with the move. And neither did Ginsburg.

"There's nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being the president in his last year," Ginsburg said in a 2016 New York Times interview in which she called for Garland to receive a confirmation vote in the Senate.

Biden is accused of hypocrisy after saying in 2016 it is the 'constitutional duty' of a president to name a SCOTUS nominee - even if it is an election year - as Trump calls on the former VP to reveal his list of potential candidates for seat

"There’s no unwritten law that says it can only be done in off years," Obama said during a news conference here after the conclusion of a two-day summit with Southeast Asian leaders. "That’s not in the constitutional text. I’m amused when I hear people claim to be strict interpreters of the Constitution suddenly reading into it a whole series of provisions that are not there.”

[Unregistered]

You’re so precious!

I seem to recall you libtards wanted to impeach him over Russia collusion too. Remember that 2+ year investigation? How could you forget the whole Russian agent bullshît. Conveniently you seem to omit that part. Wonder why? Not to forget calls for impeachment over Stormy, Emoluments Clauses, high crimes and misdemeanors, and weather maps. Once again the problem with your lame Ukraine argument is that when it came time to prove the case what happened? “I presumed” was the star witness testimony. Hmm, we had the transcript and a bunch of witnesses that couldn’t provide real evidence to refute it. That’s why he’s still in office because we don’t remove presidents over presumptions, “gut feelings”, opinions, and conjecture. Once again, Dems acted on emotion which is to be expected since they called for his impeachment on his Inauguration Day.

Again, let’s examine your argument to see the underline theme. “Likely rapist” unable to control his anger. Where’s the proof? Because Dr Ford said it happened, well so did Tara Reade but you didn’t believe her, did you? You see where we’re going with this. We don’t prevent appointments based on presumptions, “gut feelings, opinions, and conjecture. It’s very “likely” you’re a complete *********. See how that works. Dems tried to destroy the mans life over politics. It had nothing to do with him and you know it.

President Obama appointed Judge Garland during an election year. I never once heard you speak out against it. In Obama’s own words, he was “fulfilling his duties” by picking Garland. Gee no libtard outrage at all. Unfortunately for you, Dems lost the Senate and he didn’t get picked. Are you gonna sit here and try to convince us that the Dems would have confirmed Cavanaugh if the Dems controlled the Senate? You’re a special kind of stupid if you do.

Elections have consequences and America spoke. Trump won and Republicans kept the Senate. We didn’t meltdown and have a temper tantrum when we lost the house. Yet Dems wanna change the rules because they can’t seem to win otherwise. From getting rid of the filibuster to expanding the SCOTUS in order to stack the court in their favor. Really? You wanna bring up “shamelessly”? How bout this. How bout Trump wins the election then decides to “expand” the court then appoint 2-3 more conservative judges. How would you libtatds take that? You guys are playing with Fire.

Since you wanna quote people’s past comments, let’s take a look what tune Obama, Biden, and Ginsberg were singing back in 2016, shall we.

But in 2016, when a lame-duck President Obama tabbed Merrick Garland to replace the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, Democratic leaders had no problem with the move. And neither did Ginsburg.

"There's nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being the president in his last year," Ginsburg said in a 2016 New York Times interview in which she called for Garland to receive a confirmation vote in the Senate.

Biden is accused of hypocrisy after saying in 2016 it is the 'constitutional duty' of a president to name a SCOTUS nominee - even if it is an election year - as Trump calls on the former VP to reveal his list of potential candidates for seat

"There’s no unwritten law that says it can only be done in off years," Obama said during a news conference here after the conclusion of a two-day summit with Southeast Asian leaders. "That’s not in the constitutional text. I’m amused when I hear people claim to be strict interpreters of the Constitution suddenly reading into it a whole series of provisions that are not there.”

You sure spent a lot of time typing out all those regurgitated right-wing talking points, just to deflect from the most egregious hypocrisy in modern political history. After McConnell's, Graham's, etc., etc. embarrassing flip-flops, you don't get to accuse democrats of hypocrisy ever again.