Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Another top club leaving the DA to be all in ECNL
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAs long as someone is keeping score, yes it's club driven. The differentiator is supposed to be that the training, philosphy, playing style, etc. is the same. So, when the .0005% of the players who actually do get pulled in a NT camp, they are all playing the same style with the same skillsets so they don't have to waste time teaching them. They can dive right in.
Not advocating one or the other, just pointing out that one item.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAnd let me guess... your daughter is the .0005% that will get pulled in a NT camp, and dive right in, right? Hahahahaha keep dreaming
DA for us is due to lack of other available options that logistically make sense for us. We are not part of that group that DA really targets.
As I said...not advocating one or the other, just making an explanation as to how they want it to be run and for it to be autonomous across all teams.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo, you pr!ck.
DA for us is due to lack of other available options that logistically make sense for us. We are not part of that group that DA really targets.
As I said...not advocating one or the other, just making an explanation as to how they want it to be run and for it to be autonomous across all teams.
makes it pretty hard to exchange real information.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBecause I know for a 100% fact the mafia has not allowed some very qualified NE teams in. Clubs have been trying to get in since it's inception and when you have a league owned by the Clubs, they can make up whatever rules they want. It's also the real reason why some clubs dropped out of DA...because they have an ownership stake in ECNL and it makes financial sense to push their own product than pay for another.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post^ best thing to refine GDA is for it to get much smaller. BDA too. It's too big and requires too many mediocre clubs and players to fill it. Yes I know geography is an issue. But it would greatly improve the quality and be better for the top players USSF really cares about. Time for a reality check
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThat would be great the USSF needs to be “undone” and then rebuilt. We had a chance and the stupid players got cold feet and supported no change.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou cannot blame players on this. Players are choosing what is best for them. That's how a free market works. If you don't offer a better product than your competition at a perceived fair price, your competition will get the customer. As soon as USSF started building a massive league with some less than top clubs the writing was on the wall about what the quality was going to look like. It has played out exactly that way - some really good clubs, and some really bad ones, and they just added more from that later group and lost more of the former.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou cannot blame players on this. Players are choosing what is best for them. That's how a free market works. If you don't offer a better product than your competition at a perceived fair price, your competition will get the customer. As soon as USSF started building a massive league with some less than top clubs the writing was on the wall about what the quality was going to look like. It has played out exactly that way - some really good clubs, and some really bad ones, and they just added more from that later group and lost more of the former.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAgain, subjective. Who made you an expert on what is a quality club??
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThey are adjusting downwards by adding weaker teams.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postall of the people who continue to analyse this like the guy above are lost. your only basis for deciding if they are good or bad clubs is historic results. in a sport where adding 2 top level kids can totally alter the W/L of any team, how is that sensible?
- Quote
Comment
Comment