Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Soccer phase 3 take 2

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    You can reach out to Governor Baker today asking for soccer to be reclassified to "moderate" risk. Go to https://www.mass.gov/forms/email-the-governors-office. On the form just choose "phase reopening" and specify "risk reclassification" as the subject. If you want more info, look at the 7/6 guidance that came out for the Governor's office regarding sports risk classifications.
    Or sign the petition going around to add some clout
    https://www.change.org/AskGovBakerto...nMassachusetts

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Can we please avoid the politics. MA is the only state in the country that I can find that classified soccer as a high risk sport. It makes no sense. Ny NJ CT ri Oregon all classify as medium risk. And the national guidelines say the same thing. Was this a drafting error?

      Can we unite as a community and try and get this changed?

      It makes zero sense. It's the only sport in the world that has actually restarted. There is no sustained face to face proximity in soccer that lasts more than a few seconds. Write / call your state rep and bakers office. One of these people in charge must have a kid that plays soccer...
      Do we know how long each of these steps last? Are there any indicators attached to each step that we can compare to so we know that the state is moving to the next step or is this completely arbitrary?

      Comment


        #33
        Everything is completely arbitrary.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Do we know how long each of these steps last? Are there any indicators attached to each step that we can compare to so we know that the state is moving to the next step or is this completely arbitrary?
          That’s one of the main problems..no time line given, nor parameters set for determining a timeline.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            That’s one of the main problems..no time line given, nor parameters set for determining a timeline.
            I just don't understand how every Northeast state is moving forward with fall sports, specifically soccer yet in Massachusetts we are not. Can someone please explain this to me. Is Massachusetts that progressive? Do we really have better scientists than any other state in the country? Please explain the rational behind this because people are really starting to get angry. Goal posts are moved on a whim without scientific backing and we want answers now.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Do we know how long each of these steps last? Are there any indicators attached to each step that we can compare to so we know that the state is moving to the next step or is this completely arbitrary?
              It is insane the MA is dragging their feet on sports. RI is up and playing and most are saying RI will even have high school sports with a few safety regs to be put in place. But MA WTH?
              Soccer is a moderate risk sport everywhere but in MA? Why?

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                It is insane the MA is dragging their feet on sports. RI is up and playing and most are saying RI will even have high school sports with a few safety regs to be put in place. But MA WTH?
                Soccer is a moderate risk sport everywhere but in MA? Why?
                The expectation I've heard is that Phase 3 Step 1 will last the rest of July. But of course that can be changed either direction if deeded necessary.

                And I keep seeing people say that "States X, Y and Z are open for everything!" ... but that's simply not true.

                New Hampshire (naturally) is the only state allowing inter-team games (and tournaments!), although with the caveat that ALL players must be NH residents.

                CT, ME and VT allow intra-team scrimmages (with some restrictions on size and call for limited contact), but no games between teams.

                RI and MA are the most restrictive preventing all scrimmaging in practices.

                Here are my sources. Happy to see replies with better ones

                Vermont- https://usys-assets.ae-admin.com/ass...y%20June15.pdf
                Maine - http://www.soccermaine.com/assets/10...ayphaseiii.pdf
                NH - https://www.covidguidance.nh.gov/sit...uth-sports.pdf
                CT - http://www.cjsa.org/doclib/CJSA%20Cl...0Phase%202.pdf
                RI - http://lysa.gotsport.com/clubsite/?p=984

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  The expectation I've heard is that Phase 3 Step 1 will last the rest of July. But of course that can be changed either direction if deeded necessary.

                  And I keep seeing people say that "States X, Y and Z are open for everything!" ... but that's simply not true.

                  New Hampshire (naturally) is the only state allowing inter-team games (and tournaments!), although with the caveat that ALL players must be NH residents.

                  CT, ME and VT allow intra-team scrimmages (with some restrictions on size and call for limited contact), but no games between teams.

                  RI and MA are the most restrictive preventing all scrimmaging in practices.

                  Here are my sources. Happy to see replies with better ones

                  Vermont- https://usys-assets.ae-admin.com/ass...y%20June15.pdf
                  Maine - http://www.soccermaine.com/assets/10...ayphaseiii.pdf
                  NH - https://www.covidguidance.nh.gov/sit...uth-sports.pdf
                  CT - http://www.cjsa.org/doclib/CJSA%20Cl...0Phase%202.pdf
                  RI - http://lysa.gotsport.com/clubsite/?p=984

                  Thank you for that update, no sarcasm. Your source on Rhode Island is outdated and defines play in Phase II. Rhode Island has now entered phase III where game play is allowed. Ill fact check your other state sources in a bit.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Thank you for that update, no sarcasm. Your source on Rhode Island is outdated and defines play in Phase II. Rhode Island has now entered phase III where game play is allowed. Ill fact check your other state sources in a bit.
                    Noted. I had such trouble finding RI guidance. Would love if someone could find a good source.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      The expectation I've heard is that Phase 3 Step 1 will last the rest of July. But of course that can be changed either direction if deeded necessary.

                      And I keep seeing people say that "States X, Y and Z are open for everything!" ... but that's simply not true.

                      New Hampshire (naturally) is the only state allowing inter-team games (and tournaments!), although with the caveat that ALL players must be NH residents.

                      CT, ME and VT allow intra-team scrimmages (with some restrictions on size and call for limited contact), but no games between teams.

                      RI and MA are the most restrictive preventing all scrimmaging in practices.

                      Here are my sources. Happy to see replies with better ones

                      Vermont- https://usys-assets.ae-admin.com/ass...y%20June15.pdf
                      Maine - http://www.soccermaine.com/assets/10...ayphaseiii.pdf
                      NH - https://www.covidguidance.nh.gov/sit...uth-sports.pdf
                      CT - http://www.cjsa.org/doclib/CJSA%20Cl...0Phase%202.pdf
                      RI - http://lysa.gotsport.com/clubsite/?p=984
                      Your NH link is good, but your statement about only NH residents is incorrect. Here is what it states:

                      No teams/groups/athletes other than from New England are allowed at competitive
                      sporting events, training sessions, or practices in New Hampshire.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        The expectation I've heard is that Phase 3 Step 1 will last the rest of July. But of course that can be changed either direction if deeded necessary.

                        And I keep seeing people say that "States X, Y and Z are open for everything!" ... but that's simply not true.

                        New Hampshire (naturally) is the only state allowing inter-team games (and tournaments!), although with the caveat that ALL players must be NH residents.

                        CT, ME and VT allow intra-team scrimmages (with some restrictions on size and call for limited contact), but no games between teams.

                        RI and MA are the most restrictive preventing all scrimmaging in practices.

                        Here are my sources. Happy to see replies with better ones

                        Vermont- https://usys-assets.ae-admin.com/ass...y%20June15.pdf
                        Maine - http://www.soccermaine.com/assets/10...ayphaseiii.pdf
                        NH - https://www.covidguidance.nh.gov/sit...uth-sports.pdf
                        CT - http://www.cjsa.org/doclib/CJSA%20Cl...0Phase%202.pdf
                        RI - http://lysa.gotsport.com/clubsite/?p=984

                        CT is correct, to a degree. CT has paused their Phase III opening plans but "some" game play is allowed. Its dependent on the number of players on the field thus making me assume 11v11 is not happening and I would have a hard time thinking a 9v9 would be either. This is probably more inter squad scrimmages and small sided games.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          RI guidance is so frustrating to find...

                          https://reopeningri.com/wp-content/u...?189db0&189db0

                          Says "Games for no-contact and low-contact sports" but doesn't define what the sports are.

                          https://www.ricentral.com/news/raimo...188e384a8.html

                          Says of Phase III, "Close contact sports such as basketball, football and soccer, are being discouraged, and teams are being asked to keep practices to drills."

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            CT is correct, to a degree. CT has paused their Phase III opening plans but "some" game play is allowed. Its dependent on the number of players on the field thus making me assume 11v11 is not happening and I would have a hard time thinking a 9v9 would be either. This is probably more inter squad scrimmages and small sided games.
                            Are you sure it is not happening in CT???
                            https://farmington-arena.ezleagues.e...m/leagues.aspx

                            Comment


                              #44
                              here's the real CT link-

                              https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/DECD/C...ters-_Jul2.pdf

                              Has soccer in "Moderate Risk" which does indeed put them in the open for play category.

                              Lucky them

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                Can we please avoid the politics. MA is the only state in the country that I can find that classified soccer as a high risk sport. It makes no sense. Ny NJ CT ri Oregon all classify as medium risk. And the national guidelines say the same thing. Was this a drafting error?

                                Can we unite as a community and try and get this changed?

                                It makes zero sense. It's the only sport in the world that has actually restarted. There is no sustained face to face proximity in soccer that lasts more than a few seconds. Write / call your state rep and bakers office. One of these people in charge must have a kid that plays soccer...
                                So seems like each sport and their designation will be re-evaluated after two weeks. Although the link to the article provided does not discuss soccer it does discuss youth sports in general. Maybe with the fact that all surrounding states listing soccer as a "moderate risk" this can change by the end of this month. Stay tuned.

                                https://www.bostonherald.com/2020/07...-restrictions/

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X