Hillary Clinton, the most decorated politician on the planet, lost to a community organizer and a reality TV star. What's the common denominator here? Oh yeah, Russia. My bad.
Not just Russia. Also massive closeted racism, misogyny, and homophobia.
You should be looking for the truth. You are not. That is a scary thought.
Not because you are one idiot, but because I suspect there are 30 million idiots like you.
So if Hillary lost to Trump because of Russia, how’d she lose to Obama? Remember, he was a relative unknown back then with a history of community organizing. She was the favorite going into that election as well. At what point do you say she was a ****ty candidate like many before her. Seriously, how does anybody lose to Trump and u know damn well is wasn’t Russia that turned the rust belt voters. He’ll, even liberals didn’t vote for her. Once again, the most qualified candidate in decades losing twice to a community organizer and reality TV person? Your math doesn’t add up.
So if Hillary lost to Trump because of Russia, how’d she lose to Obama? Remember, he was a relative unknown back then with a history of community organizing. She was the favorite going into that election as well. At what point do you say she was a ****ty candidate like many before her. Seriously, how does anybody lose to Trump and u know damn well is wasn’t Russia that turned the rust belt voters. He’ll, even liberals didn’t vote for her. Once again, the most qualified candidate in decades losing twice to a community organizer and reality TV person? Your math doesn’t add up.
Hillary wasn’t a strong candidate. Obama was and is a popular person, so beating Clinton wasn't difficult. She is certainty better than what is in office now, and of course she won the popular vote; but the Russians along with right wing fake news agencies targeted states where the population was less educated and more vulnerable (rust belt folks too). Fake stories flooded the social media, and we all know if it’s on social media it must be true.
Hillary wasn’t a strong candidate. Obama was and is a popular person, so beating Clinton wasn't difficult. She is certainty better than what is in office now, and of course she won the popular vote; but the Russians along with right wing fake news agencies targeted states where the population was less educated and more vulnerable (rust belt folks too). Fake stories flooded the social media, and we all know if it’s on social media it must be true.
Does that help you sleep at night? I hear the same argument over and over. People just weren’t smart enough to see what’s good for them. Really? The Russians outreach was so vast that it brainwashed millions of people? So everything negative about Hillary was fake news? No backdoor deals with Russia, no destroying of hard drives and emails, no wiping servers clean, no taking the 5th, no sabotage of the Sanders campaign??? That really didn’t happen people. Russia conjured up all of that because we’re all to stupid to see what’s good for us. That same arrogance was Hillary’s downfall. She actually thought she was smarter than the voters. Now she’s left traveling to the country on her “*** HAPPENED” tour.
Comment