Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ECNL standings - FACTS
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTwere it were so simple.
IF, as u say, FSA was all about development over winning, then how would that manifest itself in measurable results? Which metric would reveal that?
Girls/alumni on the US rosters at various ages?
Alumni playing at D1 or D3 soccer powerhouses?
Alumni playing at academic powerhouses (having parlayed their soccer skills into admission credit)?
Alumni winning college all-conference honors?
Alumni getting playing time (or just being on the stated roster “wink”) in college?
Please tell us which of these (or any other metric) we can use that doesn’t end up at the same result...to wit, CFC doesn’t need to bash FSA.
Look to the East, FSA-mom, there’s a club that can benefit from bashing your club.
2017 Single Season College Soccer Quality Analysis
As determined by % of schools on commit list that made the NCAA postseason (in D1, D2, or D3) for Fall 2017. To remain objective we are looking only at whether that college was considered in the top 64 schools (top 48 for D2) for that single season.
YU – 0 of 16 = 0%
OW – 2 of 14 = 14%
FSA – 2 of 13 = 15%
CFC – 8 of 28 = 29%
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
CFC has had 5 players brought into the national team camps in the past 2 years. PM. KL. JB. CS and CF. Oakwood has had 2. LK and EJ. FSA what say you?
Development ? You develop losers. You don’t win ANYTHING. You don’t send players to any top schools or into any national camps. Stop saying you develop.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCFC has had 5 players brought into the national team camps in the past 2 years. PM. KL. JB. CS and CF. Oakwood has had 2. LK and EJ. FSA what say you?
Development ? You develop losers. You don’t win ANYTHING. You don’t send players to any top schools or into any national camps. Stop saying you develop.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
I can’t believe how far FSA is behind in the standings. It’s embarrassing. Soccerplus was not this bad on their own. Adding FSA to their name has actually hurt them. How has CFC put so much space between the two clubs?? Oakwood will be adding a few of the better FSA girls to their roster so it looks like a FSA is going to be even worse next year.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI can’t believe how far FSA is behind in the standings. It’s embarrassing. Soccerplus was not this bad on their own. Adding FSA to their name has actually hurt them. How has CFC put so much space between the two clubs?? Oakwood will be adding a few of the better FSA girls to their roster so it looks like a FSA is going to be even worse next year.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI can’t believe how far FSA is behind in the standings. It’s embarrassing. Soccerplus was not this bad on their own. Adding FSA to their name has actually hurt them. How has CFC put so much space between the two clubs?? Oakwood will be adding a few of the better FSA girls to their roster so it looks like a FSA is going to be even worse next year.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCFC has an overall record U14-18 of 37-17-12 total points of 123
FSA playing the same exact opponents has a record of 19-41-10 for 67 points
Please get me some of that funny stuff being smoked in Farmington when we hear how razor thin the difference is.
Clearly you don't know the primary purpose of youth soccer, unless you are looking at things only from the perspective of the club owner.
- Quote
Comment
Comment