We see all sorts of arguments for and against HS soccer. For arguments sake lets concede that HS soccer is still the goal for 99% of the kids. Does it make sense for the HS system to support JV soccer? Would the non-varsity freshmen and sophmores be better served staying in the club environment? Would coaches be open to a future varsity player taking a pass on JV in 9th or 10th grade? I think if a kid is good enough to play varsity they should not skip playing in HS. I struggle making the same argument for the JV team. Treat the HS team like a call up to play for your country, if not stay with your club until you get the call.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A different take on the HS debate
Collapse
X
-
UnregisteredTags: None
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWe see all sorts of arguments for and against HS soccer. For arguments sake lets concede that HS soccer is still the goal for 99% of the kids. Does it make sense for the HS system to support JV soccer? Would the non-varsity freshmen and sophmores be better served staying in the club environment? Would coaches be open to a future varsity player taking a pass on JV in 9th or 10th grade? I think if a kid is good enough to play varsity they should not skip playing in HS. I struggle making the same argument for the JV team. Treat the HS team like a call up to play for your country, if not stay with your club until you get the call.
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Absolutely ridiculous (and illegal) idea to require weaker or younger high school kids to play club soccer. The goal of HS sports from an administration's stand point is to keep kids busy, physically active, build community etc. That includes JV level. Their goal is not to build the nation's soccer players. Some of our better players at our medium sized school are LAX and track studs who also happen to be good soccer players too. They just haven't played it since maybe 7th or 8th grade. They beat out many club players for spots - which also brings up the point that not all clubs are quality clubs.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAbsolutely ridiculous (and illegal) idea to require weaker or younger high school kids to play club soccer. The goal of HS sports from an administration's stand point is to keep kids busy, physically active, build community etc. That includes JV level. Their goal is not to build the nation's soccer players. Some of our better players at our medium sized school are LAX and track studs who also happen to be good soccer players too. They just haven't played it since maybe 7th or 8th grade. They beat out many club players for spots - which also brings up the point that not all clubs are quality clubs.
The post is thought provoking so I willl take a stab..
Does it make sense for the HS system to support JV soccer? Yes but see next answer
Would the non-varsity freshmen and sophmores be better served staying in the club environment? YES, if the training is better and they are getting in games
Would coaches be open to a future varsity player taking a pass on JV in 9th or 10th grade? NO, coaches will take this as a slight to them personally.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Comment