Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'01 Girls

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    I ran the data this morning and factored in allowable variances.

    Updated Rankings as of 5/24/18:

    1. Thorns Academy
    2. Crossfire United ECNL
    3. Crossfire Oregon
    4. Eugene Timbers
    5. Salem CFC
    6. PCU
    7. FC Portland ECNL
    8. FC Portland Navy
    9. Westside Timbers
    This is complete BS. Where did you get your data? I’m not even going to justify this.

    Comment


      Realistic Rankings

      1. CU ECNL 01

      2. ***C 02

      2. CFC 01

      3. CU ECNL 02

      4. FC Portland ECNL 01

      5. Eugene 01

      6. GPS 03

      6. Eastside 02

      7. Thorns Academy 02/03

      7. PCU 01

      8. CU ECNL 03

      9. FC Portland ECNL 02

      10. Eugene 02

      Comment


        Makes the most sense of all the rankings but I don't trust CU coaches. They will say anything and usually they are trying to sell you some bs so you can't think too far into this ranking.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Going off of history, CFC has 0 D1 players currently committed. So dad can only brag about winning a meaningless state cup!
          No athletic commits from Eugene or any team besides ecnl & academy but they will start coming in.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            No athletic commits from Eugene or any team besides ecnl & academy but they will start coming in.
            No bs from Eugene or any team besides Ecnl and academy but they will start coming in..


            Again, no one trusts CU coaches. Propaganda sellers.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              1. CU ECNL 01

              2. ***C 02

              2. CFC 01

              3. CU ECNL 02

              4. FC Portland ECNL 01

              5. Eugene 01

              6. GPS 03

              6. Eastside 02

              7. Thorns Academy 02/03

              7. PCU 01

              8. CU ECNL 03

              9. FC Portland ECNL 02

              10. Eugene 02

              CU ECNL 01s probably wouldn't beat CFC or ***C 02s or any of the top 5 on any given day. Just because they play a weak Ecnl schedule and their coaches are snake oil salesman doesn't mean they are number 1.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                1. CU ECNL 01

                2. ***C 02

                2. CFC 01

                3. CU ECNL 02

                4. FC Portland ECNL 01

                5. Eugene 01

                6. GPS 03

                6. Eastside 02

                7. Thorns Academy 02/03

                7. PCU 01

                8. CU ECNL 03

                9. FC Portland ECNL 02

                10. Eugene 02
                Whoever posted this is certifiably insane. Any list with PCU on it is automatically discounted as bogus. The PCU 01 team didn't win a game in the State Cup did they? And if you're being realistic, the ECNL and Academy teams have to be at the top, followed by those special OYSA one-off teams that attract players like GPS 2003, etc. But some of the teams on this list don't belong in the same conversation with some of the other teams. It's just ridiculous. For all you ECNL and GDA haters, you cannot disagree that those leagues are much tougher than OYSA. That is an undeniable fact. It's a fact that does not detract from the OYSA, it just is a fact.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  I ran the data this morning and factored in allowable variances.

                  Updated Rankings as of 5/24/18:

                  1. Thorns Academy
                  2. Crossfire United ECNL
                  3. Crossfire Oregon
                  4. Eugene Timbers
                  5. Salem CFC
                  6. PCU
                  7. FC Portland ECNL
                  8. FC Portland Navy
                  9. Westside Timbers
                  What data? What allowable variances? +/- #?
                  LOL

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Whoever posted this is certifiably insane. Any list with PCU on it is automatically discounted as bogus. The PCU 01 team didn't win a game in the State Cup did they? And if you're being realistic, the ECNL and Academy teams have to be at the top, followed by those special OYSA one-off teams that attract players like GPS 2003, etc. But some of the teams on this list don't belong in the same conversation with some of the other teams. It's just ridiculous. For all you ECNL and GDA haters, you cannot disagree that those leagues are much tougher than OYSA. That is an undeniable fact. It's a fact that does not detract from the OYSA, it just is a fact.
                    Sorry fc Portland nutcase. You don't get credit by association.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      I ran the data this morning and factored in allowable variances.

                      Updated Rankings as of 5/24/18:

                      1. Thorns Academy
                      2. Crossfire United ECNL
                      3. Crossfire Oregon
                      4. Eugene Timbers
                      5. Salem CFC
                      6. PCU
                      7. FC Portland ECNL
                      8. FC Portland Navy
                      9. Westside Timbers
                      The only one on here that’s right is #7. The rest are all wrong.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Whoever posted this is certifiably insane. Any list with PCU on it is automatically discounted as bogus. The PCU 01 team didn't win a game in the State Cup did they? And if you're being realistic, the ECNL and Academy teams have to be at the top, followed by those special OYSA one-off teams that attract players like GPS 2003, etc. But some of the teams on this list don't belong in the same conversation with some of the other teams. It's just ridiculous. For all you ECNL and GDA haters, you cannot disagree that those leagues are much tougher than OYSA. That is an undeniable fact. It's a fact that does not detract from the OYSA, it just is a fact.
                        Ecnl in Oregon is no better than anyone else. Where have you been the past 5 years? It's been a joke and now the top players have left so it's even worse....cu has 2 good teams but that doesn't excuse the fact that Fcp is in dire straights and cu can't seem to keep people at their club and their older teams like the 00s and 02s are a joke. 03s had to recruit to make themselves even remotely competitive and they lost players to thorns. Before the DA came in cu S teams almost always have negative goal differentials.

                        If you think the thorns have gotten better after last year then you don't know what you are talking about.

                        The simple fact that you think getting shamed every game outside of state or winning against similar mediocre teams makes you some how good by participation is hilarious.

                        OYSA has a few good teams and the mediocre ones are just as good as some of the crap ecnl competition or DA teams out there. You know that is fact. Or is -30 goal differentials only exclusive to cu 00s.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Ecnl in Oregon is no better than anyone else. Where have you been the past 5 years? It's been a joke and now the top players have left so it's even worse....cu has 2 good teams but that doesn't excuse the fact that Fcp is in dire straights and cu can't seem to keep people at their club and their older teams like the 00s and 02s are a joke. 03s had to recruit to make themselves even remotely competitive and they lost players to thorns. Before the DA came in cu S teams almost always have negative goal differentials.

                          If you think the thorns have gotten better after last year then you don't know what you are talking about.

                          The simple fact that you think getting shamed every game outside of state or winning against similar mediocre teams makes you some how good by participation is hilarious.

                          OYSA has a few good teams and the mediocre ones are just as good as some of the crap ecnl competition or DA teams out there. You know that is fact. Or is -30 goal differentials only exclusive to cu 00s.
                          So the last 5 years both ECNL clubs have had more and better commitments to schools, and they’re the same as CFC, WST, EST, PCU? What moron logic that is.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            I ran the data this morning and factored in allowable variances.

                            Updated Rankings as of 5/24/18:

                            1. Thorns Academy
                            2. Crossfire United ECNL
                            3. Crossfire Oregon
                            4. Eugene Timbers
                            5. Salem CFC
                            6. PCU
                            7. FC Portland ECNL
                            8. FC Portland Navy
                            9. Westside Timbers

                            Why is Crossfire Oregon ranked so high? Have they ever won anything?

                            Comment


                              The 01 Girls thread had drifted off into oblivion. Whoever bumped it up, I'd like to see someone smack you upside the head. Hypothetically of course. Or a hypothetical asteroid land on your unoccupied car.


                              I know families on CU, WashT, CFC, FCP, Thorns Academy and Eugene. All seem very happy with where they are. All of the teams have a good handful of girls either committed to college or lining up good college spots.

                              What's the beef? Let the old grudges go. Be happy. Pour a glass of wine and sit on your porch and enjoy the nice weather. This will all be over soon.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                So the last 5 years both ECNL clubs have had more and better commitments to schools, and they’re the same as CFC, WST, EST, PCU? What moron logic that is.
                                Sorry. Someone lied to you. You should probably learn about the facts before you fill this place with lies. We know Ecnl lost a lot of the top teams even though you didn't play them because cu and Fcp are bad but you sound desperate

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X