Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FCIAC girls HS soccer Fall 2017

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    No real quitter dad was the one whose kid is at HC now and went after FC nonstop. This guy is quitter jr. So one tried to ruin a coach's reputation and get her fired, the other arrested for sending a coach to the hospital. Toss up which is worse.
    She's anchoring the defense of a 4-8-4 crappy team in a crappy conference. SWEET!

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Dad is big contributing alum, she's fine
      OH, is that how she got her offer? Big donations?

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        I wish the media would have the guts to publish this douche's name instead of saying 'a parent'.
        http://greenwich.dailyvoice.com/poli...r-game/725240/

        Comment


          Wilton: what a shyte show.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            maybe if the team got pulled from post season play the parents would get the message that you can't behave this way. At the very least both girls should be suspended for the rest of the season. I disagree with the ludlowe coach when he says that it's the heat of the moment and it happens. Tough physical play and passion are very different than throwing punches.
            1st player in should get normal one game suspension, 2nd player in should get 3 games. Stuff happens in a game and if two kids are getting on each other and want to go, I get it ..... its sports, emotions run high, stuff happens. However, there is no excuse for the 3rd player involved and they should get the biggest punishment. Typically this is the kid that comes in and blindsides the opponent's first player in.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              1st player in should get normal one game suspension, 2nd player in should get 3 games. Stuff happens in a game and if two kids are getting on each other and want to go, I get it ..... its sports, emotions run high, stuff happens. However, there is no excuse for the 3rd player involved and they should get the biggest punishment. Typically this is the kid that comes in and blindsides the opponent's first player in.
              2nd player in for a given team (probably should have said 3rd players there too).

              Comment


                Who gets to decide this and when? CIAC, FCIAC, Wilton ED or PD? Or multiple judgements?

                Comment


                  Getting my Popcorn.

                  Comment


                    Littany of charges:

                    https://www.wiltonbulletin.com/10974...coach-assault/ .... one of those has to be a felony.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      1st player in should get normal one game suspension, 2nd player in should get 3 games. Stuff happens in a game and if two kids are getting on each other and want to go, I get it ..... its sports, emotions run high, stuff happens. However, there is no excuse for the 3rd player involved and they should get the biggest punishment. Typically this is the kid that comes in and blindsides the opponent's first player in.
                      So player 1 and 2 start shoving and then trading punches and you are worried about the third player ... you can make the case that third player was either protecting their own or trying to break it up

                      The punches were the escalation not the third person in

                      Player 1 and 2 get the harshest penalty. Unless it can be proven that one clearly starred the punching. The third player gets a lighter punishment (but still substantial) for joining the fray

                      Judge Judy

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Who gets to decide this and when? CIAC, FCIAC, Wilton ED or PD? Or multiple judgements?
                        Assault of the other coach is all police, and then up to Wilton to decide of felon dad is banned from all sports.
                        CIAC has rules (game suspension likely ) but the schools or even coaches could also impose ther own punishments in addition to that (also unlikely to be significant going into playoffs )

                        Comment


                          The CIAC has it's rules about suspensions from red cards and that is all they will enforce here.

                          The FCIAC may have its own rules that apply beyond the CIAC rules. Unlikely, but possible. Conferences tend to align with the CIAC on these kinds of rules interpretations.

                          If the athletic departments and soccer programs have any rules that mean anything, they should enforce the most appropriate and stringent response. This is a reflection on their soccer programs and athletic programs and they should send the appropriate message to their communities here. There would be some kids and parents here that would be done for the season if this happened in our high school soccer programs, regardless of the impact on the post-season.

                          There are lessons to be learned here far more important than high school soccer.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            So player 1 and 2 start shoving and then trading punches and you are worried about the third player ... you can make the case that third player was either protecting their own or trying to break it up

                            The punches were the escalation not the third person in

                            Player 1 and 2 get the harshest penalty. Unless it can be proven that one clearly starred the punching. The third player gets a lighter punishment (but still substantial) for joining the fray

                            Judge Judy
                            Nope, Sorry Judy. Make it like the NHL did .... if a third player enters the fracas for any reason (even to try to break it up) he gets the stiffest penalty ..... that rule has nearly eliminated bench clearing brawls over night. Once the third player enters a fight 4th, 5th, and 6th ..... players need to jump in to help. There is no excuse. The third player should be penalized the most. Again, the third player unbalances a fair fight and they often blindside or hold the 2nd player who gets the brunt of the damage.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              So player 1 and 2 start shoving and then trading punches and you are worried about the third player ... you can make the case that third player was either protecting their own or trying to break it up

                              The punches were the escalation not the third person in

                              Player 1 and 2 get the harshest penalty. Unless it can be proven that one clearly starred the punching. The third player gets a lighter punishment (but still substantial) for joining the fray

                              Judge Judy
                              Player 3 is rendered the most egregious foul call with the addition of exasperation.
                              The Supreme Court

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                Nope, Sorry Judy. Make it like the NHL did .... if a third player enters the fracas for any reason (even to try to break it up) he gets the stiffest penalty ..... that rule has nearly eliminated bench clearing brawls over night. Once the third player enters a fight 4th, 5th, and 6th ..... players need to jump in to help. There is no excuse. The third player should be penalized the most. Again, the third player unbalances a fair fight and they often blindside or hold the 2nd player who gets the brunt of the damage.
                                I really miss the Hanson brothers

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X