Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Trump’s Accusers
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post😂 Miranda applies to notification of right to remain silent at point of arrest. E. Jean Carroll has a CIVIL suit filed against Trump for defamation. I’m sure he can refuse to be deposed I’m the case but that’s going to work against him had when it comes to verdict time.
A judge has already directed that he submit a sample. That’s what triggered his now failed bid to have DOJ defend him. Let’s stay tuned. Again, perhaps it won’t be criminal if he doesn’t provide it for a civil suit - not a lawyer - but I don’t think a judge is going to overlook the noncooperation when rendering judgment.
Also, too, if the DNA would exonerate , why not do it ? consciousness of guilt I think
If one was guilty you would be an idiot . If innocent you would be smart to clear your name.
Easy peasy con.
the defamation occured while he was POTUS thats why DOJ sought to represent
she is suing for defamation -the Burden of proof is on her to prove he knowingly provided false and injurious information - i would fight the sample as well in this instance
keep trying
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postthe defamation occured while he was POTUS thats why DOJ sought to represent
she is suing for defamation -the Burden of proof is on her to prove he knowingly provided false and injurious information - i would fight the sample as well in this instance
keep trying
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostA judge has ruled he must provide it. Will SCOTUS protect him before the clock runs out on his presidency? After January he can either produce (and clear his name, no?) or not, in which case a jury will consider that as a guilt.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Posta jury will consider that as whatever they feel, as all jurors do
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo, the judge will instruct the jury to make a negative inference based on his refusal to provide it, among other sanctions that the judge can levy. Th judge may even default Trump for violating the judge's order.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNot the OP but I would bet $100 OP has more legal insight than you. Something tells me 😊
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe judge doesn't even need to tell them that. Juries may not always be the best and brightest, but they'd know defying a legal order means you've got something to hide.
so it will be resolved before the Jury ever is presented with the case
- Quote
Comment
Comment