UConn lost to Syracuse. Going to be a very long LOSING year in Storrs
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
It’s almost college season
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostUConn was outplayed by Central CT tonight. Not good that UConnjust squeaked by Central
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBad soccer at its best...by both teams
the best athletes go to the top soccer schools and the other schools are largely making the best of a mixed bag of players, athletes and walk ons.
Enjoy the spirit, the competition, the effort from the kids etc, but if you are looking for consistent quality in a UConn CCSU game then you are in the wrong place.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postcan i ask what your expectations are? ive said it so many times on TS - outside of maybe 15 schools, the quality is not high. we dont play ball on the ground, clever passing soccer in the USA. Did you watch the U20s in the WC ?
the best athletes go to the top soccer schools and the other schools are largely making the best of a mixed bag of players, athletes and walk ons.
Enjoy the spirit, the competition, the effort from the kids etc, but if you are looking for consistent quality in a UConn CCSU game then you are in the wrong place.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHave to disagree with you slightly. I agree that the best players are consolidated at the top 15 schools (soccer wise) and the rest is a mixed bag. But I wouldn’t say none of them keep it on the ground. Some of them do, but it’s a slower pace than the top schools and when an athletic team pressures them, they aren’t proficient enough to keep it. Yes there are some teams that use athleticism to create chances from mistakes and even some that play direct because they are more athletic than skilled, but I have found those to be the exception rather than the rule. Nearly every team TRIES to play. Not all are good enough to do it. Considering there are more than 10,000 players in D1 alone, it’s difficult to develop that many top players given other constraints like school, work, social...etc.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI disagree a little bit. It seems clear that the reason ECNL and high schools play long-ball soccer is that colleges and national teams pretty much always play long ball. Size and athleticism are valued over soccer skills across the board. 1v1 and 1v2 play is less valued than the ability to womp the ball to a fast player who can run on to it. So, the UCONN CCSU game was probably just as intended and fun for those who watched and participated. Good on MD for keeping it close, too, probably made some good recruiting choices.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
In defense of CCSU and UConn, there are probably 15-20 teams in the world who can consistently play short touch passing. England bypassed the midfield for the entirety of the World Cup.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIn defense of CCSU and UConn, there are probably 15-20 teams in the world who can consistently play short touch passing. England bypassed the midfield for the entirety of the World Cup.
no one benefits from being part of player development. They benefit from winning. Our game reflects that at every level.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI disagree a little bit. It seems clear that the reason ECNL and high schools play long-ball soccer is that colleges and national teams pretty much always play long ball. Size and athleticism are valued over soccer skills across the board. 1v1 and 1v2 play is less valued than the ability to womp the ball to a fast player who can run on to it. So, the UCONN CCSU game was probably just as intended and fun for those who watched and participated. Good on MD for keeping it close, too, probably made some good recruiting choices.
Too many critics. Most teams try to play. But athleticism will go a long way towards making that difficult. Who won the WC? And what was the defining factor? Speed. Can’t teach it. The rest is just noise. The US remains the best on the women’s side and have been a power for many years. Early on there wasn’t much competition. Now there is, and they remain at the top. The men are not bc they are simply too many other opportunities over here. American football. Baseball. Basketball. Hockey.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYes, size and athleticism are valued, but it doesn’t have to be at the expense of skills. What is the difference between an NBA player and a good college player? Freak athleticism. It isn’t that much different in soccer.
Too many critics. Most teams try to play. But athleticism will go a long way towards making that difficult. Who won the WC? And what was the defining factor? Speed. Can’t teach it. The rest is just noise. The US remains the best on the women’s side and have been a power for many years. Early on there wasn’t much competition. Now there is, and they remain at the top. The men are not bc they are simply too many other opportunities over here. American football. Baseball. Basketball. Hockey.
- Quote
Comment
Comment