Talking-Soccer.com  

Go Back   Talking-Soccer.com > Soccer By Region / State > Region 4 > Oregon

Notices

Oregon Discussions about Oregon soccer.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-02-2018
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Why is this OYSA fault. They sanction the league. They also sanction many leagues. If you don't like the league join another. You don't even have to play in OYSA
You can't be this dense. They signed away their entire state memberships: ODP, RTC, League & cup revenues and had it become a direct deposit to the Timbers.
It's an incompetent and thoughtless business move by a non profit OYSA BOD created to serve its membership not the Timbers.Can't blame the Timbers they are a for profit business that could care less about the OYSA members pocketbooks as long as they get paid.
Again like another poster mentioned dissolve the OYSA and start over.

Simple fix for this level of pure incompetence.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-02-2018
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default don't blame OYSA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
You can't be this dense. They signed away their entire state memberships: ODP, RTC, League & cup revenues and had it become a direct deposit to the Timbers.
It's an incompetent and thoughtless business move by a non profit OYSA BOD created to serve its membership not the Timbers.Can't blame the Timbers they are a for profit business that could care less about the OYSA members pocketbooks as long as they get paid.
Again like another poster mentioned dissolve the OYSA and start over.

Simple fix for this level of pure incompetence.
Don't blame OYSA. Yes the Timbers bid on ODP and RTC and OYSA gave them the bid. Yes the Timbers operate a league but anyone can operate a league in OYSA. The clubs could form another OPC and create a league under OYSA. Plus there is the US Club league operating in the PacNW. Just join one or create a different league if you don't like the Timbers/Thorns.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-02-2018
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Don't blame OYSA. Yes the Timbers bid on ODP and RTC and OYSA gave them the bid. Yes the Timbers operate a league but anyone can operate a league in OYSA. The clubs could form another OPC and create a league under OYSA. Plus there is the US Club league operating in the PacNW. Just join one or create a different league if you don't like the Timbers/Thorns.
Easier if the OYSA dissolves and a new Oregon USYS affiliate is created. Timbers are out of the picture this way, USYS leagues & cups are in play + ODP. Running away to the US Club option is not an option for anyone with a half a brain, it's how this whole mess started. Only 2 clubs are stupid enough to do anything with US Club these days. I love the Timbers!! They are slick smart it's the OYSA that is incompetent and needs to be reborn without all the strings attached to 3rd party profiteers that have nothing to do with the a USYS non profit state association. Except in modern day Oregon.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-05-2018
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Are there more

Are there more Xfire affiliates beside Oregon?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-05-2018
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Are there more Xfire affiliates beside Oregon?
Of the same ilk as Oregon's local neighborhood clubs? yes : Yakima Crossfire (RCL).


The more you know. http://www.crossfireyakima.org/home.php
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-05-2018
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Easier if the OYSA dissolves and a new Oregon USYS affiliate is created. Timbers are out of the picture this way, USYS leagues & cups are in play + ODP. Running away to the US Club option is not an option for anyone with a half a brain, it's how this whole mess started. Only 2 clubs are stupid enough to do anything with US Club these days. I love the Timbers!! They are slick smart it's the OYSA that is incompetent and needs to be reborn without all the strings attached to 3rd party profiteers that have nothing to do with the a USYS non profit state association. Except in modern day Oregon.
The OYSA people who signed the Timbers deal are long gone. The timbers people are still around making the money. OYSA should go away and a new affiliate started that doesn't answer to (or pay) Timbers.

As a non-profit OYSA should show their members the contract.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-05-2018
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
The OYSA people who signed the Timbers deal are long gone. The timbers people are still around making the money. OYSA should go away and a new affiliate started that doesn't answer to (or pay) Timbers.

As a non-profit OYSA should show their members the contract.
For not showing the contract to it's members, that's enough for them to dissolve.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-05-2018
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CrossFire Oregon

I wonder what the purpose is of remaining CrossFire Oregon is? Is it to just upstream money to CrossFire premier? I don't think the name does much for them.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-05-2018
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I wonder what the purpose is of remaining CrossFire Oregon is? Is it to just upstream money to CrossFire premier? I don't think the name does much for them.
Just another pop up club name like: ‘United’, ‘ADF’, ‘GPS’, ‘Bara’, ‘Nich’ etc...

Nobody cares except the ‘operators’.

In this situation, 3 local clubs were blended about 7 years ago-SSC, LOSC & WUSC at specifically the older ages (HS). They called themselves OSSA then out of thin air a year or two later they re-branded as ‘CrossFire Oregon’. Historically speaking, the WUSC club couldn’t form HS aged teams, SSC was hit and miss, LOSC actually held their own for decades in the HS ages. I digress....Present day Crossfire Oregon lost SSC and kept LOSC & WUSC (Lake Oswego, West Linn & Wilsonville) consisting mainly of WL/LO/WIL classic level players at the older ages.

Recently, the US SOCCER short lived ‘little Portland Metro boys DA league’ (u12, u13 & u14) also included the (LOSC & WUSC club blend) they chose to use the ‘Crossfire’ label.

How about ‘LO/WLW’ or just stick with Crossfire Oregon?

It’s LOSC and WUSC combined, that’s what it is.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-05-2018
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I wonder what the purpose is of remaining CrossFire Oregon is? Is it to just upstream money to CrossFire premier? I don't think the name does much for them.
Isn’t CrossFire Premier DA free for boys and girls? Just like timbers take money from other clubs to subsidize their DA? Ironic that CrossFire oregon is subsidizing somebody else’s DA and complaining about the timbers doing the same.

What has soccer come to?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.