Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Identifying and Watching A Developmental Saboteur
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostEcnl clubs? He describes Nefc to a T.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI have two daughters, 12 and 14, playing for NEFC for the last 3 years. After every game, win or lose, their coaches talk about what went well and what didn't. And what they'll be working on at the next practice. Disappointed when they play poorly but still win; praise and encourage the kids when they play well but still lose. Focus is on getting better, and I can honestly say both have continued to develop and improve, which is the goal.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
The ironic part is that many of the "uneducated parents" mentioned are just like some of the talking soccer parents posting in this forum. All talking about the "elite" league or division or game winning team that there kids are on - virtually NO discussion or perspective of whether their kid is actually getting better technically and tactically. And no perspective of what "getting good " actually is, except that the team won , or is a da team of premier team or ecnl team.
Maybe a reality check would be that the player is getting real good if they could keep up or dominate in the soccer system of the soccer countries. The honest answer for virtually all the players told they are elite here by their parents or coaches would absolutely fail in a tryout or game in the soccer contras mid to elite level academies. They would be way behind technically and tactically - and without that even the strongest athletes from here wouldn't even touch the ball in a game situation there as the ball would be whizzing around them.
There's something wrong here when many "top" players in the U.S. Aren't even really developed by their clubs, but outside trainers etc. just my two cents.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe ironic part is that many of the "uneducated parents" mentioned are just like some of the talking soccer parents posting in this forum. All talking about the "elite" league or division or game winning team that there kids are on - virtually NO discussion or perspective of whether their kid is actually getting better technically and tactically. And no perspective of what "getting good " actually is, except that the team won , or is a da team of premier team or ecnl team.
Maybe a reality check would be that the player is getting real good if they could keep up or dominate in the soccer system of the soccer countries. The honest answer for virtually all the players told they are elite here by their parents or coaches would absolutely fail in a tryout or game in the soccer contras mid to elite level academies. They would be way behind technically and tactically - and without that even the strongest athletes from here wouldn't even touch the ball in a game situation there as the ball would be whizzing around them.
There's something wrong here when many "top" players in the U.S. Aren't even really developed by their clubs, but outside trainers etc. just my two cents.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Don't disagree with a lot of what the article says but find it ironic because ECNL itself is all about the league and not the teaching and that's why we have so many elitest fools in this state telling parents that their kids are going to be "left behind" if they don't get with the ECNL program. NPL is now just as guilty (with less than 2 years under their belt in this state) yet year after year kids achieve their soccer goals without participating in either league. Messages at tryout times are notorious for trying to make parents feel bad if their kid isn't getting the "exposure" they need if they aren't in one of these leagues.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDon't disagree with a lot of what the article says but find it ironic because ECNL itself is all about the league and not the teaching and that's why we have so many elitest fools in this state telling parents that their kids are going to be "left behind" if they don't get with the ECNL program. NPL is now just as guilty (with less than 2 years under their belt in this state) yet year after year kids achieve their soccer goals without participating in either league. Messages at tryout times are notorious for trying to make parents feel bad if their kid isn't getting the "exposure" they need if they aren't in one of these leagues.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt is this philosophy that keeps the US from getting better. The fact of the matter is most college coaches have no idea how to develop players so they hide behind this philosophy.
Btw, define development for us in collegiate terms.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou should know how to play at this point in your life. If your touch still lacks, you're not playing in college. The only instruction a college coach should be giving is how to play his system. Does it involve pass and move or is it more direct? Is there development that occurs during training session? Of course, but it is secondary.
Btw, define development for us in collegiate terms.
Period.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
"There's something wrong here when many "top" players in the U.S. Aren't even really developed by their clubs, but outside trainers etc. just my two cents."
The above was the last sentence in a recent post in this thread, and it got me thinking. I started my coaching carreer in club about 20 years ago, and I was fortunate to learn from a number f great coaches that focused on development, and the process of learning to play the game a number of ways. They focused on the possession, and all that was required to be capable when they went into HS, and then maybe college. They taught the players that being able to keep possession as a team and as an individual was the what separated great players from good, but they also taught their players how to play direct. They taught players that at some point in their playing time will require them to learn both. Playing a man down/up may require you to play a specific way. They taught players that the way the other team is playing may require more or less possession, and sometimes beating a team that plays high or tries to trap will require less possession and more direct play. They also taught them that Being able to float between both will make players/teams better to handle whatever happens.
These coaches were stead fast in their approach, and believed a great first touch was the key. Being able to be proficient in the technical would give more time to play with their head up, and able to read the game faster. This would lead to better movement off the ball and create other options, and this would lead players to be able to make better decisions, and be able to play possession with the 5-10 yard pass or with a 30 yard pass that bypasses the midfield, and be comfortable floating between possession and direct. That was the goal for them, and I don't see the combination of the two anymore.
I do see coaches and clubs getting better at teaching the technical foundation that these coaches would teach, but I'm not seeing teams that can operate tactically in both areas, or players being able to see past the 10 yard pass or 1st option. I also don't see teams/players be able to protect the ball on purpose to drag teams out of their plan, and create situations. I only see possession for the sake of possession. I haven't seen a local team control the tempo of a game in a number of years, or be able to recognize when to play short and when to play long. I saw a team that was technically superior to another, but the team with less ability was fast and pressed all over the field and high. All it would have taken to break them down and force them into being stretched was a couple of balls over the top to a midfield replacing a checking in forward or for a forward to make a rounded run between to backs, and for a player to take the chance over or through into the 60 yards of empty space behind the backs.
I know that the game goes in cycles and right now it's the Barcelona style that is prevalent in the game, but this isn't going to develop better thinking players. There were coaches who could teach both, and could get players to understand that both makes you better at the one you will need at the right time. Where have these coaches gone? They sad answer is they've gotten out of club soccer. They either moved on to college or higher, and do the private training thing. I've asked my former teachers why and they all say the same thing, they can't coach the way they want or should anymore. Coaches only spend a year or two with the same team, and clubs don't do a good enough job being consistent with what is being taught coach to coach. We hear it all the time! This player did well with this coach or that coach, then had a coach who only wanted this way or that way. We post about what a great coach this one is or how poor that one is, and we never put 2 and 2 together. The way we teach the game needs to be consistent from coach to coach, and needs to be all aspects of how to play the game.
Too many coaches only coaching what they're comfortable with, and not getting better educated to teach it all, and every year. Not the current way of one year it's possesion all the way up the field, and one year it's Route 1, it needs to be incorporated into every year, and it needs to be explained to parents and players why it should be this way. Your players need to learn that there are more than one way to play game to game and minute to minute. We need more of these coaches, and we need to not demand the club bring in a new coach or threaten to move on to another team after a 2 game losing streak. Until we do American soccer will be stuck right where it is now. Not bad but not great either!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Came across this on the CT site. Evidently it's a newer club that is trying to shake things up and do it differently. Intense training, less traveling (in state for games and only travel is key showcase events. No weekends on the road). They just did their own college id clinic. Already have some players committed to colleges in a short period of time.
http://girlscanfootball.com/connecticut/
- ECNL parent who doesn't think ECNL is all that
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCame across this on the CT site. Evidently it's a newer club that is trying to shake things up and do it differently. Intense training, less traveling (in state for games and only travel is key showcase events. No weekends on the road). They just did their own college id clinic. Already have some players committed to colleges in a short period of time.
http://girlscanfootball.com/connecticut/
- ECNL parent who doesn't think ECNL is all that
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post"There's something wrong here when many "top" players in the U.S. Aren't even really developed by their clubs, but outside trainers etc. just my two cents."
The above was the last sentence in a recent post in this thread, and it got me thinking. I started my coaching carreer in club about 20 years ago, and I was fortunate to learn from a number f great coaches that focused on development, and the process of learning to play the game a number of ways. They focused on the possession, and all that was required to be capable when they went into HS, and then maybe college. They taught the players that being able to keep possession as a team and as an individual was the what separated great players from good, but they also taught their players how to play direct. They taught players that at some point in their playing time will require them to learn both. Playing a man down/up may require you to play a specific way. They taught players that the way the other team is playing may require more or less possession, and sometimes beating a team that plays high or tries to trap will require less possession and more direct play. They also taught them that Being able to float between both will make players/teams better to handle whatever happens.
These coaches were stead fast in their approach, and believed a great first touch was the key. Being able to be proficient in the technical would give more time to play with their head up, and able to read the game faster. This would lead to better movement off the ball and create other options, and this would lead players to be able to make better decisions, and be able to play possession with the 5-10 yard pass or with a 30 yard pass that bypasses the midfield, and be comfortable floating between possession and direct. That was the goal for them, and I don't see the combination of the two anymore.
I do see coaches and clubs getting better at teaching the technical foundation that these coaches would teach, but I'm not seeing teams that can operate tactically in both areas, or players being able to see past the 10 yard pass or 1st option. I also don't see teams/players be able to protect the ball on purpose to drag teams out of their plan, and create situations. I only see possession for the sake of possession. I haven't seen a local team control the tempo of a game in a number of years, or be able to recognize when to play short and when to play long. I saw a team that was technically superior to another, but the team with less ability was fast and pressed all over the field and high. All it would have taken to break them down and force them into being stretched was a couple of balls over the top to a midfield replacing a checking in forward or for a forward to make a rounded run between to backs, and for a player to take the chance over or through into the 60 yards of empty space behind the backs.
I know that the game goes in cycles and right now it's the Barcelona style that is prevalent in the game, but this isn't going to develop better thinking players. There were coaches who could teach both, and could get players to understand that both makes you better at the one you will need at the right time. Where have these coaches gone? They sad answer is they've gotten out of club soccer. They either moved on to college or higher, and do the private training thing. I've asked my former teachers why and they all say the same thing, they can't coach the way they want or should anymore. Coaches only spend a year or two with the same team, and clubs don't do a good enough job being consistent with what is being taught coach to coach. We hear it all the time! This player did well with this coach or that coach, then had a coach who only wanted this way or that way. We post about what a great coach this one is or how poor that one is, and we never put 2 and 2 together. The way we teach the game needs to be consistent from coach to coach, and needs to be all aspects of how to play the game.
Too many coaches only coaching what they're comfortable with, and not getting better educated to teach it all, and every year. Not the current way of one year it's possesion all the way up the field, and one year it's Route 1, it needs to be incorporated into every year, and it needs to be explained to parents and players why it should be this way. Your players need to learn that there are more than one way to play game to game and minute to minute. We need more of these coaches, and we need to not demand the club bring in a new coach or threaten to move on to another team after a 2 game losing streak. Until we do American soccer will be stuck right where it is now. Not bad but not great either!
1) you learned almost nothing high level tactically in your American club experience compared to international level (and these were "top" US clubs or academy players
2) to the kids that stood out reasonably technically it was almost always the case when asked that they learned this outside of club environment ie trained with an outside coach usually with foreign background, or parent trained them and was ex pro ,or played lots of futsal etc outside of club
3) there was lot less care that a kid was physically more or less mature for his age the touch and tactical was most important, the physical side all the top academy coaches said was the easiest to train over time and they knew how to spot potential talent to adjust for this ( was said maturity comes in "gods time") and were dumbfounded by all the focus on advanced for age body type athletes without having skill and tactical in the US. You would have to be exceptionally athletic (not just mature for age) or even better exceptionally skilled for them to take positive notice.
4) with very few exceptions no one was ever impressed with a league or US tournament title etc to be honest- how you stacked up individually to the pro track kids there is all that mattered.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIm the OP you quoted- thanks for the post and sharing your experience. The first thing the soccer countries academy base team coaches would spot about American players they interacted with were:
1) you learned almost nothing high level tactically in your American club experience compared to international level (and these were "top" US clubs or academy players
2) to the kids that stood out reasonably technically it was almost always the case when asked that they learned this outside of club environment ie trained with an outside coach usually with foreign background, or parent trained them and was ex pro ,or played lots of futsal etc outside of club
3) there was lot less care that a kid was physically more or less mature for his age the touch and tactical was most important, the physical side all the top academy coaches said was the easiest to train over time and they knew how to spot potential talent to adjust for this ( was said maturity comes in "gods time") and were dumbfounded by all the focus on advanced for age body type athletes without having skill and tactical in the US. You would have to be exceptionally athletic (not just mature for age) or even better exceptionally skilled for them to take positive notice.
4) with very few exceptions no one was ever impressed with a league or US tournament title etc to be honest- how you stacked up individually to the pro track kids there is all that mattered.
- Quote
Comment
Comment