Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Breaking News: Fox news reporting that Putin slept with HRC!!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Why is it that Trump is criticized for his comment that “no place for racism and bigotry” is not enough without specifically calling out white nationalists when Bernie’s comment on the senate floor after one of his supporters attempted to assassinate multiple GOP congressional representatives was essentially the same (no place for hatred). Bernie did not call out Marxist/Socialist Extremists/Terrorists but Trump is supposed to call out “White Nationalists”?
    Double standard, typical of the left.

    Marie Harf is a bimbo – claiming on Fox News Sunday that any equivalence between violence on the left and right is a false equivalence, and Biden saying there is only one side not “all sides”. Sickening. Marie Harf feels this way because she is a leftist, and sympathetic with leftist causes. She is a shallow and myopic ideological bigot and people like her on the left are the ones polarizing society through application of double standards like the one above. Like some of the airheads here on this thread, their message is “accept extreme leftism or there will be violence”, a tune we have heard through history dozens of times…
    Stop the blame game. He is our President and has a responsibility to denounce the white supremists hatred and violence.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Doh! When he's doing a shi* job then yeah the news is going to be negative. He's doing a shi* job. Yesterday was proof positive. Take off your rose colored Fox glasses, maybe take an online course in journalism to see how real journalists do their jobs. Fox is ANYTHING but "fair and balanced."

      Signed - a Republican voter who actually has an open mind
      China/Russia signed sanctions against DPRK - FIRST TIME IN HISTORY - if this is not proof Trump he is doing an excellent job to you then you have far from an "open" mind. You are a disgruntled never-Trumper blinded by hatred.

      So much for the theory that the extreme bias (which even you cannot deny, though you tried to several pages ago with the flawed media trustworthiness study) is due to poor performance. It is media bias - and so EXTREME it is no wonder we have gunmen shooting at GOP representatives on baseball fields, and neo-Nazis running protesters over. The left wing media, so completely unhinged and biased, and people like YOU who accept their perofrmance as normal/natural - is what is driving the polarization we are seeing in the USA which could lead to civil war.

      BTW, if your candidate with the milky white and smooth hands (never worked an honest job in his life) was in office the DPRK and China would be playing the same game as always, just like they did with Obama, Bush, Clinton et al. That is because he is weak - just a clever self-serving politician - not even a real man, never built anything - just a talking head no action. People in DPRK and China are not stupid, they know when they are dealing with paper tiger. Clearly things have changed with Trump in control and the media study cited is just further proof of massive alt-left media bias.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Stop the blame game. He is our President and has a responsibility to denounce the white supremists hatred and violence.
        Mindless response. Bernie deserves a lot of blame. His class warfare rhetoric pitting Americans against Americans is what drove his disciple to attempt mass murder of GOP representatives with an AK 47. Trump on the other hand has never pitted one American against another (only Americans against criminal illegal immigrants).

        For attempting to impose yet ANOTHER left wing double standard, I award you the "Dunce of the Day" award. People just like you -- who think like you --- are ultimately at the root of the violence and division. Cant recall race-based protests until Obama was elected and the ensuing mainstream media love affair with him as he applied racial double standards all over the place. What you are witnessing now is the backlash to this. Congrats Libtards - you have really screwed America up (which was probably your original aim).

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Doh! When he's doing a shi* job then yeah the news is going to be negative. He's doing a shi* job. Yesterday was proof positive. Take off your rose colored Fox glasses, maybe take an online course in journalism to see how real journalists do their jobs. Fox is ANYTHING but "fair and balanced."

          Signed - a Republican voter who actually has an open mind
          BTW the bias was even WORSE before the election, with journalists offering excuses that he would be so dangerous they had to suspend the normal rules of journalism.

          This is another indication that the media bias shown in the Harvard study has nothing to do with presidential performance and everything to do with ideological bias.

          You say you have an open mind, but then make lame and unsubstantiated excuses for the worst media bias against a sitting US president in history. Which makes you dishonest, and not worth further discussion.

          Comment


            The old "its not media bias because they are right" argument is a lot like the "its not a crime because the law is unfair" argument. The argument of a child.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Doh! When he's doing a shi* job then yeah the news is going to be negative. He's doing a shi* job. Yesterday was proof positive. Take off your rose colored Fox glasses, maybe take an online course in journalism to see how real journalists do their jobs. Fox is ANYTHING but "fair and balanced."

              Signed - a Republican voter who actually has an open mind
              Only FOX NEWS balance resembles the split among the American people which is 50/50 on Trump ... the vast majority of the mainstream media are out of step with the American people, which is the definition of bias... and even liberal Harvard calls them out on it.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                China/Russia signed sanctions against DPRK - FIRST TIME IN HISTORY - if this is not proof Trump he is doing an excellent job to you then you have far from an "open" mind.
                First time in history?? I guess you forgot that China and Russia supported the Obama-era U.N. sanctions agreed upon last year. But they didn't report that on Fox News and Breitbart so you must have missed it.

                If you think China and Russia are genuflecting to Trump instead of looking out for their own best interests you're even dumber than I thought. I know it's getting harder to say positive things about your idol but at least come up with something that's not demonstrably false.

                Comment


                  President Trump receives a twice-daily folder full of positive cable news chyrons (those lower-third headlines and crawls), admiring tweets, transcripts of fawning TV interviews, and praise-filled news stories. If there is any given day where there isn't enough positive content to present to the President, staffers reportedly find press photos of him 'looking powerful', three current and former White House officials claim.

                  Even the right-wing news sources are reporting this (sorry, Libtard Guy):
                  http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tr...rticle/2630937
                  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-news-him.html

                  I can't think of anything more pathetic than a world leader so narcissistic that he needs to be fluffed with propaganda twice a day. When they run out of positive press and flattering photos, they probably just make stuff up. Or look to really obscure sources . . . like a soccer blog???

                  Maybe that's why our resident alt-right nutjob posts here all the time. They have to fill those twice daily propaganda folders with something. Maybe this tool is hoping to be picked up as a paid fluffer.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    President Trump receives a twice-daily folder full of positive cable news chyrons (those lower-third headlines and crawls), admiring tweets, transcripts of fawning TV interviews, and praise-filled news stories. If there is any given day where there isn't enough positive content to present to the President, staffers reportedly find press photos of him 'looking powerful', three current and former White House officials claim.

                    Even the right-wing news sources are reporting this (sorry, Libtard Guy):
                    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tr...rticle/2630937
                    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-news-him.html

                    I can't think of anything more pathetic than a world leader so narcissistic that he needs to be fluffed with propaganda twice a day. When they run out of positive press and flattering photos, they probably just make stuff up. Or look to really obscure sources . . . like a soccer blog???

                    Maybe that's why our resident alt-right nutjob posts here all the time. They have to fill those twice daily propaganda folders with something. Maybe this tool is hoping to be picked up as a paid fluffer.
                    Funny and believable!😂😂😂😂😂

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      President Trump receives a twice-daily folder full of positive cable news chyrons (those lower-third headlines and crawls), admiring tweets, transcripts of fawning TV interviews, and praise-filled news stories. If there is any given day where there isn't enough positive content to present to the President, staffers reportedly find press photos of him 'looking powerful', three current and former White House officials claim.

                      Even the right-wing news sources are reporting this (sorry, Libtard Guy):
                      http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tr...rticle/2630937
                      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-news-him.html

                      I can't think of anything more pathetic than a world leader so narcissistic that he needs to be fluffed with propaganda twice a day. When they run out of positive press and flattering photos, they probably just make stuff up. Or look to really obscure sources . . . like a soccer blog???

                      Maybe that's why our resident alt-right nutjob posts here all the time. They have to fill those twice daily propaganda folders with something. Maybe this tool is hoping to be picked up as a paid fluffer.
                      Truly pathetic as human being - but what's even scarier for all of us as a nation is he barely glances at the daily security briefings - you know that information from intel agencies and the military and bout dangers here and abroad? God forbid we suffer some kind of attack or a deadly contagious virus breaks out (any of which impacts people on both sides of the aisle. It's funny how death can do that) he'll be asking to see what nice things Fox said about him today.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        First time in history?? I guess you forgot that China and Russia supported the Obama-era U.N. sanctions agreed upon last year. But they didn't report that on Fox News and Breitbart so you must have missed it.

                        If you think China and Russia are genuflecting to Trump instead of looking out for their own best interests you're even dumber than I thought. I know it's getting harder to say positive things about your idol but at least come up with something that's not demonstrably false.
                        China's participation in the recent set of sanctions is "unprecedented".
                        http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...n-north-korea/

                        LOL - yeah, after Trump won the election - an election where he blasted and threatened China repeatedly for enabling DPRK (in stark contrast with the loser HRC). Russia/China are not dumb, they realized the landscape has changed, no more wimpy nice guy, time for the bad cop. You have to be a delusional idiot not to attribute this historic inflection point first in November and now more recently as a DIRECT result of Trump's rhetoric and positioning. Just looking at the recent sanctions they are historic, unlike anything the world has ever seen on DPRK under decades of former establishment presidents - " the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation” and stand in stark contrast to the "strategic patience" of the Obama era.

                        When you ask people to believe China/Russia signing on after it was clear Trump would be taking the reigns of power is only a coincidence, that it would have happened if HRC were elected, and was not a function of American rhetoric or leadership changes but instead because they all of a sudden "realized their interests are at risk if DPRK continues" (never realizing it before in the preceding decades), you are disgracing yourself. This is the kind of baseless, blatant left-wing spin propaganda we would expect out of MSNBC and CNN. The American people are not that stupid. Even if Obama drafted the first weaker set, China/Russia would have obviously vetoed like they have every other time in recent memory had HRC won. Everyone but you seems to know/understand this.

                        And you call yourself a Republican? More likely a Libtard pretending to be one for strategic debating leverage. Walk like a duck, talk like a duck, you are a duck (and a disingenuous one at that).

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          China's participation in the recent set of sanctions is "unprecedented".
                          http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...n-north-korea/

                          LOL - yeah, after Trump won the election - an election where he blasted and threatened China repeatedly for enabling DPRK (in stark contrast with the loser HRC). Russia/China are not dumb, they realized the landscape has changed, no more wimpy nice guy, time for the bad cop. You have to be a delusional idiot not to attribute this historic inflection point first in November and now more recently as a DIRECT result of Trump's rhetoric and positioning. Just looking at the recent sanctions they are historic, unlike anything the world has ever seen on DPRK under decades of former establishment presidents - " the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation” and stand in stark contrast to the "strategic patience" of the Obama era.

                          When you ask people to believe China/Russia signing on after it was clear Trump would be taking the reigns of power is only a coincidence, that it would have happened if HRC were elected, and was not a function of American rhetoric or leadership changes but instead because they all of a sudden "realized their interests are at risk if DPRK continues" (never realizing it before in the preceding decades), you are disgracing yourself. This is the kind of baseless, blatant left-wing spin propaganda we would expect out of MSNBC and CNN. The American people are not that stupid. Even if Obama drafted the first weaker set, China/Russia would have obviously vetoed like they have every other time in recent memory had HRC won. Everyone but you seems to know/understand this.

                          And you call yourself a Republican? More likely a Libtard pretending to be one for strategic debating leverage. Walk like a duck, talk like a duck, you are a duck (and a disingenuous one at that).
                          United against North Korea

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            President Trump receives a twice-daily folder full of positive cable news chyrons (those lower-third headlines and crawls), admiring tweets, transcripts of fawning TV interviews, and praise-filled news stories. If there is any given day where there isn't enough positive content to present to the President, staffers reportedly find press photos of him 'looking powerful', three current and former White House officials claim.

                            Even the right-wing news sources are reporting this (sorry, Libtard Guy):
                            http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tr...rticle/2630937
                            http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-news-him.html

                            I can't think of anything more pathetic than a world leader so narcissistic that he needs to be fluffed with propaganda twice a day. When they run out of positive press and flattering photos, they probably just make stuff up. Or look to really obscure sources . . . like a soccer blog???

                            Maybe that's why our resident alt-right nutjob posts here all the time. They have to fill those twice daily propaganda folders with something. Maybe this tool is hoping to be picked up as a paid fluffer.
                            He looks at all of his coverage, positive and negative (as evidenced by the fact that he tweets out in frustration sometimes due to unfair coverage). What the heck is wrong with that? You saying Obama never read positive coverage of his policies? And really, what are you going to complain about next, that he wears black old man socks, or likes to cycle around his old offices at his various resorts to get away from the oval office (which is probably bugged by Obama holdovers) once in a while?

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              United against North Korea
                              China even signaled they were going to work with Trump on DPRK during the meeting with Xi. Trump was so confident of an upcoming inflection point after his meeting with Xi at G20, he predicted it - when is the last time you saw a weak establishment politician predict so boldly and then be vindicated?

                              Trump with Xi: There will be success against North Korea - CNNPolitics
                              http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/08/politi...g20/index.html

                              Never before has China worked so closely with the US on DPRK. But its all a coincidence and has nothing to do with Trump or his rhetoric, positioning and negotiating during G20 and later in private meetings with Xi in WH. Got it!

                              You guys are trying so hard, reaching and straining so arduously to deny the obvious - you got your ars kicked in the election and now your worst nightmare is that he is going to be successful for the American people. Because you are not patriots, but self-absorbed hyperpartisans, you view this as something that would be a disaster. Watch him fix the DPRK problem, fix the economy, fix healthcare, fix taxes, fix infrastructure, fix trade imbalance, fix disappearing manufacturing jobs, fix immigration - and then FIX YOU GUYS again in 2020.

                              Comment


                                Left quickly takes advantage of yesterday's rampage to smear the POTS as a “racist responsible for death”, yet violent alt-left groups like BLM have much closer relationships with the DNC than white supremacists have with Trump (who has disavowed them). Left wing radical groups have terrorized this country over the past several years, breaking windows, beating innocent people of opposing skin color up shooting police officers and rioting in the streets. Has the DNC condemned “left wing violence”? Not so much.

                                As a matter of fact, after the GOP shooting, when the Bernie Bro attempted mass-murder on a large fraction of the entire GOP congress, Democratic leadership and GOP establishment (McConnell, Susan Collins) blamed harsh rhetoric from both sides. Yet, when Trump says literally the same thing yesterday, they all say, “No – just your side”. When a BLM crazy assassinated police officers in Dallas, Obama warned of “the danger of taking an act committed by a crazy individual and ascribing it to an entire political organization”. Where was this language yesterday? If the driver of the Dodge were a Muslim, the Libtard media would call him a “lone wolf” and state that his motives were “unclear”. When the Paris van terror attack happened, CNN described it as a “Van attack” but yesterday was not a “Dodge Charger” attack but a "White Supremeceist Trump Supporter attack"? Same people that will not use the term “Islamic Terrorism” are now demanding Trump call yesterday “White Supremecist Terror”. This from the party that called the Fort Hood shooting “workplace violence”.

                                Left is always going on and on about lone wolves being behind terrorism, how they are mentally unstable individuals acting on their own behalf, not emblematic of an entire religion. Yet the Nazi dude yesterday is somehow emblematic of Trump and Trump’s base?

                                You people here that support the left and never-Trumpers using yesterdays events to smear the POTUS are hypocritical scum.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X