Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Breaking News: Fox news reporting that Putin slept with HRC!!
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDoh! When he's doing a shi* job then yeah the news is going to be negative. He's doing a shi* job. Yesterday was proof positive. Take off your rose colored Fox glasses, maybe take an online course in journalism to see how real journalists do their jobs. Fox is ANYTHING but "fair and balanced."
Signed - a Republican voter who actually has an open mind
So much for the theory that the extreme bias (which even you cannot deny, though you tried to several pages ago with the flawed media trustworthiness study) is due to poor performance. It is media bias - and so EXTREME it is no wonder we have gunmen shooting at GOP representatives on baseball fields, and neo-Nazis running protesters over. The left wing media, so completely unhinged and biased, and people like YOU who accept their perofrmance as normal/natural - is what is driving the polarization we are seeing in the USA which could lead to civil war.
BTW, if your candidate with the milky white and smooth hands (never worked an honest job in his life) was in office the DPRK and China would be playing the same game as always, just like they did with Obama, Bush, Clinton et al. That is because he is weak - just a clever self-serving politician - not even a real man, never built anything - just a talking head no action. People in DPRK and China are not stupid, they know when they are dealing with paper tiger. Clearly things have changed with Trump in control and the media study cited is just further proof of massive alt-left media bias.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostStop the blame game. He is our President and has a responsibility to denounce the white supremists hatred and violence.
For attempting to impose yet ANOTHER left wing double standard, I award you the "Dunce of the Day" award. People just like you -- who think like you --- are ultimately at the root of the violence and division. Cant recall race-based protests until Obama was elected and the ensuing mainstream media love affair with him as he applied racial double standards all over the place. What you are witnessing now is the backlash to this. Congrats Libtards - you have really screwed America up (which was probably your original aim).
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDoh! When he's doing a shi* job then yeah the news is going to be negative. He's doing a shi* job. Yesterday was proof positive. Take off your rose colored Fox glasses, maybe take an online course in journalism to see how real journalists do their jobs. Fox is ANYTHING but "fair and balanced."
Signed - a Republican voter who actually has an open mind
This is another indication that the media bias shown in the Harvard study has nothing to do with presidential performance and everything to do with ideological bias.
You say you have an open mind, but then make lame and unsubstantiated excuses for the worst media bias against a sitting US president in history. Which makes you dishonest, and not worth further discussion.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
The old "its not media bias because they are right" argument is a lot like the "its not a crime because the law is unfair" argument. The argument of a child.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDoh! When he's doing a shi* job then yeah the news is going to be negative. He's doing a shi* job. Yesterday was proof positive. Take off your rose colored Fox glasses, maybe take an online course in journalism to see how real journalists do their jobs. Fox is ANYTHING but "fair and balanced."
Signed - a Republican voter who actually has an open mind
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostChina/Russia signed sanctions against DPRK - FIRST TIME IN HISTORY - if this is not proof Trump he is doing an excellent job to you then you have far from an "open" mind.
If you think China and Russia are genuflecting to Trump instead of looking out for their own best interests you're even dumber than I thought. I know it's getting harder to say positive things about your idol but at least come up with something that's not demonstrably false.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
President Trump receives a twice-daily folder full of positive cable news chyrons (those lower-third headlines and crawls), admiring tweets, transcripts of fawning TV interviews, and praise-filled news stories. If there is any given day where there isn't enough positive content to present to the President, staffers reportedly find press photos of him 'looking powerful', three current and former White House officials claim.
Even the right-wing news sources are reporting this (sorry, Libtard Guy):
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tr...rticle/2630937
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-news-him.html
I can't think of anything more pathetic than a world leader so narcissistic that he needs to be fluffed with propaganda twice a day. When they run out of positive press and flattering photos, they probably just make stuff up. Or look to really obscure sources . . . like a soccer blog???
Maybe that's why our resident alt-right nutjob posts here all the time. They have to fill those twice daily propaganda folders with something. Maybe this tool is hoping to be picked up as a paid fluffer.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostPresident Trump receives a twice-daily folder full of positive cable news chyrons (those lower-third headlines and crawls), admiring tweets, transcripts of fawning TV interviews, and praise-filled news stories. If there is any given day where there isn't enough positive content to present to the President, staffers reportedly find press photos of him 'looking powerful', three current and former White House officials claim.
Even the right-wing news sources are reporting this (sorry, Libtard Guy):
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tr...rticle/2630937
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-news-him.html
I can't think of anything more pathetic than a world leader so narcissistic that he needs to be fluffed with propaganda twice a day. When they run out of positive press and flattering photos, they probably just make stuff up. Or look to really obscure sources . . . like a soccer blog???
Maybe that's why our resident alt-right nutjob posts here all the time. They have to fill those twice daily propaganda folders with something. Maybe this tool is hoping to be picked up as a paid fluffer.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostPresident Trump receives a twice-daily folder full of positive cable news chyrons (those lower-third headlines and crawls), admiring tweets, transcripts of fawning TV interviews, and praise-filled news stories. If there is any given day where there isn't enough positive content to present to the President, staffers reportedly find press photos of him 'looking powerful', three current and former White House officials claim.
Even the right-wing news sources are reporting this (sorry, Libtard Guy):
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tr...rticle/2630937
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-news-him.html
I can't think of anything more pathetic than a world leader so narcissistic that he needs to be fluffed with propaganda twice a day. When they run out of positive press and flattering photos, they probably just make stuff up. Or look to really obscure sources . . . like a soccer blog???
Maybe that's why our resident alt-right nutjob posts here all the time. They have to fill those twice daily propaganda folders with something. Maybe this tool is hoping to be picked up as a paid fluffer.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostFirst time in history?? I guess you forgot that China and Russia supported the Obama-era U.N. sanctions agreed upon last year. But they didn't report that on Fox News and Breitbart so you must have missed it.
If you think China and Russia are genuflecting to Trump instead of looking out for their own best interests you're even dumber than I thought. I know it's getting harder to say positive things about your idol but at least come up with something that's not demonstrably false.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...n-north-korea/
LOL - yeah, after Trump won the election - an election where he blasted and threatened China repeatedly for enabling DPRK (in stark contrast with the loser HRC). Russia/China are not dumb, they realized the landscape has changed, no more wimpy nice guy, time for the bad cop. You have to be a delusional idiot not to attribute this historic inflection point first in November and now more recently as a DIRECT result of Trump's rhetoric and positioning. Just looking at the recent sanctions they are historic, unlike anything the world has ever seen on DPRK under decades of former establishment presidents - " the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation” and stand in stark contrast to the "strategic patience" of the Obama era.
When you ask people to believe China/Russia signing on after it was clear Trump would be taking the reigns of power is only a coincidence, that it would have happened if HRC were elected, and was not a function of American rhetoric or leadership changes but instead because they all of a sudden "realized their interests are at risk if DPRK continues" (never realizing it before in the preceding decades), you are disgracing yourself. This is the kind of baseless, blatant left-wing spin propaganda we would expect out of MSNBC and CNN. The American people are not that stupid. Even if Obama drafted the first weaker set, China/Russia would have obviously vetoed like they have every other time in recent memory had HRC won. Everyone but you seems to know/understand this.
And you call yourself a Republican? More likely a Libtard pretending to be one for strategic debating leverage. Walk like a duck, talk like a duck, you are a duck (and a disingenuous one at that).
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostChina's participation in the recent set of sanctions is "unprecedented".
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...n-north-korea/
LOL - yeah, after Trump won the election - an election where he blasted and threatened China repeatedly for enabling DPRK (in stark contrast with the loser HRC). Russia/China are not dumb, they realized the landscape has changed, no more wimpy nice guy, time for the bad cop. You have to be a delusional idiot not to attribute this historic inflection point first in November and now more recently as a DIRECT result of Trump's rhetoric and positioning. Just looking at the recent sanctions they are historic, unlike anything the world has ever seen on DPRK under decades of former establishment presidents - " the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation” and stand in stark contrast to the "strategic patience" of the Obama era.
When you ask people to believe China/Russia signing on after it was clear Trump would be taking the reigns of power is only a coincidence, that it would have happened if HRC were elected, and was not a function of American rhetoric or leadership changes but instead because they all of a sudden "realized their interests are at risk if DPRK continues" (never realizing it before in the preceding decades), you are disgracing yourself. This is the kind of baseless, blatant left-wing spin propaganda we would expect out of MSNBC and CNN. The American people are not that stupid. Even if Obama drafted the first weaker set, China/Russia would have obviously vetoed like they have every other time in recent memory had HRC won. Everyone but you seems to know/understand this.
And you call yourself a Republican? More likely a Libtard pretending to be one for strategic debating leverage. Walk like a duck, talk like a duck, you are a duck (and a disingenuous one at that).
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostPresident Trump receives a twice-daily folder full of positive cable news chyrons (those lower-third headlines and crawls), admiring tweets, transcripts of fawning TV interviews, and praise-filled news stories. If there is any given day where there isn't enough positive content to present to the President, staffers reportedly find press photos of him 'looking powerful', three current and former White House officials claim.
Even the right-wing news sources are reporting this (sorry, Libtard Guy):
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tr...rticle/2630937
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-news-him.html
I can't think of anything more pathetic than a world leader so narcissistic that he needs to be fluffed with propaganda twice a day. When they run out of positive press and flattering photos, they probably just make stuff up. Or look to really obscure sources . . . like a soccer blog???
Maybe that's why our resident alt-right nutjob posts here all the time. They have to fill those twice daily propaganda folders with something. Maybe this tool is hoping to be picked up as a paid fluffer.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostUnited against North Korea
Trump with Xi: There will be success against North Korea - CNNPolitics
http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/08/politi...g20/index.html
Never before has China worked so closely with the US on DPRK. But its all a coincidence and has nothing to do with Trump or his rhetoric, positioning and negotiating during G20 and later in private meetings with Xi in WH. Got it!
You guys are trying so hard, reaching and straining so arduously to deny the obvious - you got your ars kicked in the election and now your worst nightmare is that he is going to be successful for the American people. Because you are not patriots, but self-absorbed hyperpartisans, you view this as something that would be a disaster. Watch him fix the DPRK problem, fix the economy, fix healthcare, fix taxes, fix infrastructure, fix trade imbalance, fix disappearing manufacturing jobs, fix immigration - and then FIX YOU GUYS again in 2020.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Left quickly takes advantage of yesterday's rampage to smear the POTS as a “racist responsible for death”, yet violent alt-left groups like BLM have much closer relationships with the DNC than white supremacists have with Trump (who has disavowed them). Left wing radical groups have terrorized this country over the past several years, breaking windows, beating innocent people of opposing skin color up shooting police officers and rioting in the streets. Has the DNC condemned “left wing violence”? Not so much.
As a matter of fact, after the GOP shooting, when the Bernie Bro attempted mass-murder on a large fraction of the entire GOP congress, Democratic leadership and GOP establishment (McConnell, Susan Collins) blamed harsh rhetoric from both sides. Yet, when Trump says literally the same thing yesterday, they all say, “No – just your side”. When a BLM crazy assassinated police officers in Dallas, Obama warned of “the danger of taking an act committed by a crazy individual and ascribing it to an entire political organization”. Where was this language yesterday? If the driver of the Dodge were a Muslim, the Libtard media would call him a “lone wolf” and state that his motives were “unclear”. When the Paris van terror attack happened, CNN described it as a “Van attack” but yesterday was not a “Dodge Charger” attack but a "White Supremeceist Trump Supporter attack"? Same people that will not use the term “Islamic Terrorism” are now demanding Trump call yesterday “White Supremecist Terror”. This from the party that called the Fort Hood shooting “workplace violence”.
Left is always going on and on about lone wolves being behind terrorism, how they are mentally unstable individuals acting on their own behalf, not emblematic of an entire religion. Yet the Nazi dude yesterday is somehow emblematic of Trump and Trump’s base?
You people here that support the left and never-Trumpers using yesterdays events to smear the POTUS are hypocritical scum.
- Quote
Comment
Comment