Breaking News: Fox news reporting that Putin slept with HRC!!

[Unregistered]

Greenfield: The Memo Reveals the Coup against America:
https://www.truthrevolt.org/commenta...gainst-america

Nunes: More Memos Are Coming
http://www.weeklystandard.com/nunes-...rticle/2011452

or from CNN for the libtard cult members with ideological blinders on that that only read left-wing publications:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/02/polit...emo/index.html

Libtard deprogramming school is out of session for this morning - have to get back to work - enjoy the rest of your day!

[Unregistered]

Accusing the Justice Department of bias against the Trump administration is a bit like saying the exterminator is biased against the cockroaches. Let them do their jobs.

Here there is an admission from the liberals that it is OK to corrupt governmental institutions to persecute your political enemies. Of course only when the left is in power. When the right is in power. This is the kind of mindless self-advocacy that lends to the hypothesis that liberals are either mentally challenged or downright dark. How about fair play no matter who is in charge?

[Unregistered]

Anyone who uses only cases that support their viewpoint is exhibiting bias. I believe the debate was whether they were biased or not. Tell me again how I was soundly defeated?

You asserted that Politifact unfairly targeted conservatives. The data you used to support your argument was faulty. Therefore you failed to support your assertion and lost the debate.

If Politifact never called out Obama you might have a point, but here's list of Politifact's Pants-On-Fire statements from Obama:
http://www.politifact.com/personalit...ng/pants-fire/

You will say there were many more, so I will patiently wait for you to list them. I'll even let you use all 8 years of his presidency. Let me know when you get to 2000, OK?

[Unregistered]

pussy.

I'm sorry. I must come back and apologize for that particular comment. Will not happen again - LG

[Unregistered]

You asserted that Politifact unfairly targeted conservatives. The data you used to support your argument was faulty. Therefore you failed to support your assertion and lost the debate.

If Politifact never called out Obama you might have a point, but here's list of Politifact's Pants-On-Fire statements from Obama:
http://www.politifact.com/personalit...ng/pants-fire/

You will say there were many more, so I will patiently wait for you to list them. I'll even let you use all 8 years of his presidency. Let me know when you get to 2000, OK?

OMG you just admitted they are biased, and then say I failed to demonstrate my point that they are biased.

From your own words a few posts ago: "the sampling was inherently biased, because Politifact chooses a non-random sample of statements to fact-check, statements in which there is public interest, as opposed to random samples from both sides."

WHATEVER the excuse or reason for the comments selected, whatever the reason for the bias, it is still bias. Are we speaking the same language?

And your comment about the public only being interested in comments that Politifact and Snopes can twist and distort into evidence for lies like the "red button" comment - is that the same as the electoral public that elected him president? You make no sense, but this is irrelevant - I claimed bias, you admit there is bias. Reason for it is irrelevant. Case close, you lose another one.

[Unregistered]

Now we know where Steele got his information - aside from the Russians that is:

Clinton associates fed information to Trump dossier author Steele, memo says
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...memo-says.html

[Unregistered]

Here there is an admission from the liberals that it is OK to corrupt governmental institutions to persecute your political enemies. Of course only when the left is in power. When the right is in power. This is the kind of mindless self-advocacy that lends to the hypothesis that liberals are either mentally challenged or downright dark. How about fair play no matter who is in charge?

Most in the justice department, FBI etc are Republicans. Top leadership - Republican, some of which were even appointed by Trump. Yet they're saying those Republicans can't do their jobs because they're politically biased? Can't make this sh*t up.

You know Sessions and Rosenstein are all but out the door. He's also laying the groundwork to never talk to Mueller. Prior he said he would if his attorneys advised him to. So the perfect excuse is to blame the attorneys advice against it, just like he blamed being audited for not releasing his tax returns. By proving (in his own mind) that the investigation is biased he'll also use that as an excuse to not meet with Mueller.

[Unregistered]

Here with this mini-debate we can see very clearly through the window into the liberal mind.

Bias and non-random sampling for convenience is not bias if the public agrees (or at least, if those practicing the bias and non-random sampling say they do).

Material misstatements of truth are not lies if there is a good reason for them.

Corruption of federal institutions is not corruption if the other side is bad, like roaches that need exterminating.

The kind of circular reasoning that defines the sick, liberal mind. It is not the liberal that is sick – they are redeemable – but the liberals mind. Thank you systematically corrupt and biased media and education system.

[Unregistered]

Trump got it wrong again in his tweet about UK healthcare today. UK Healthcare protests were not as portrayed by FOX and Nigel Farage's (who led the charge to get out of Brexit and shares many common ideologies with Trump) appearance on FOX.

"The president’s comments came shortly after former Ukip leader Nigel Farage appeared on one of Mr Trump’s favourite US TV news shows to talk about the NHS. Mr Farage’s appearance on Fox And Friends seemed to be the reason for Mr Trump’s Twitter comment.

"The demonstration, called NHS In Crisis: Fix It Now, was organised by the People’s Assembly and Health Campaigns Together. Responding to Mr Trump’s comments the groups said they were campaigning against moves to an “expensive, inefficient and unjust” US-style system. In their message to Mr Trump, the groups said in a statement: “This is what our demonstration was about on Saturday February 3 and tens of thousands of British people want to show their love for the principles of universal and comprehensive care free at the point of use, paid for through general taxation. “We don’t agree with your divisive and incorrect rhetoric. No thanks.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-tr...155040357.html

[Unregistered]

Most in the justice department, FBI etc are Republicans. Top leadership - Republican, some of which were even appointed by Trump. Yet they're saying those Republicans can't do their jobs because they're politically biased? Can't make this sh*t up.

You know Sessions and Rosenstein are all but out the door. He's also laying the groundwork to never talk to Mueller. Prior he said he would if his attorneys advised him to. So the perfect excuse is to blame the attorneys advice against it, just like he blamed being audited for not releasing his tax returns. By proving (in his own mind) that the investigation is biased he'll also use that as an excuse to not meet with Mueller.

Ever heard of the term "Never Trumper" (NT)? Best way for a NT to achieve their objectives is to not let anyone know they are an NT and get appointed to a post in the cabinet. As a career, establishment swamp guy, Rosenstein gleefully assisted the Democrats in attempting to undermine Trump's pre-election candidacy by signing off on the FISA warrant even though he know it was driven by the fake DNC funded dossier, and even though he knew that prior to that the Trump associate investigations were all based on tips from the Trump-hating dossier author to Bruce Ohr, the FBI liberal whose wife worked for Fusion GPS which funded the fake dossier. Trump didnt know about that until recently, which is why Rosenstein is going to be fired soon. Why was Rosenstein a NT? Because Trump is a disruptor, promising to clean out the swamp, and Rosenstein has made a nice nest for himself in the swamp.

Trump was fooled - just like he was by Priebus - dont forget the RNC (McCain, Graham, McConnel et al.) hated him as much as the DNC. That is because Trump is a true disruptor - the most disruptive, transformative president in the history of the USA. Which is precisely why the electorate hired him.

[Unregistered]

Ever heard of the term "Never Trumper" (NT)? Best way for a NT to achieve their objectives is to not let anyone know they are an NT and get appointed to a post in the cabinet. As a career, establishment swamp guy, Rosenstein gleefully assisted the Democrats in attempting to undermine Trump's pre-election candidacy by signing off on the FISA warrant even though he know it was driven by the fake DNC funded dossier, and even though he knew that prior to that the Trump associate investigations were all based on tips from the Trump-hating dossier author to Bruce Ohr, the FBI liberal whose wife worked for Fusion GPS which funded the fake dossier. Trump didnt know about that until recently, which is why Rosenstein is going to be fired soon. Why was Rosenstein a NT? Because Trump is a disruptor, promising to clean out the swamp, and Rosenstein has made a nice nest for himself in the swamp.

Trump was fooled - just like he was by Priebus - dont forget the RNC (McCain, Graham, McConnel et al.) hated him as much as the DNC. That is because Trump is a true disruptor - the most disruptive, transformative president in the history of the USA. Which is precisely why the electorate hired him.

Wait a minute - someone fooled the smartest guy in the world? Plus, the whole thing is a just a bunch of smoke and mirrors by Trump. Carter Page had been on the FBI's radar since 2013 when the Russians attempted to recruit him as an agent and he was running around bragging about his contacts with Russia. The dossier is just icing on the cake. Also its interesting to me that the republicans constantly talk about the fact that the source of the dossier was the democrats when in fact the project had been started by a republican think tank. Also, where is the evidence that the information within the dossier is false? As a former prosecutor I can tell you that I routinely obtained evidence from biased sources - former girlfriends, fellow gang members with a beef, relatives with an ax to grind. Virtually no one comes to law enforcement without an ulterior motive. The police and prosecutors will simply evaluate all of the evidence - including the source's bias, in deciding whether or not to proceed.

[Unregistered]

pussy.

Grab it quick....before tRUMP does... they let him do it you know...

[Unregistered]

Now we know where Steele got his information - aside from the Russians that is:

Clinton associates fed information to Trump dossier author Steele, memo says
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...memo-says.html

Actually, count the number of times it says allegedly... so "we" don't know...

....Dow Jones worst point drop in history today... interest rates rising ... government shutdown looming on Thursday...
and guess who is watching Fox and tweeting derogatory comments?

At what point are you going to man up and admit you have been conned?

[Unregistered]

Actually, count the number of times it says allegedly... so "we" don't know...

....Dow Jones worst point drop in history today... interest rates rising ... government shutdown looming on Thursday...
and guess who is watching Fox and tweeting derogatory comments?

At what point are you going to man up and admit you have been conned?

Imagine that, being the president when the Dow Jones has its all-time record fall.
They are not being conned, they are being bullied.

[Unregistered]

Here with this mini-debate we can see very clearly through the window into the liberal mind.

Bias and non-random sampling for convenience is not bias if the public agrees (or at least, if those practicing the bias and non-random sampling say they do).

Material misstatements of truth are not lies if there is a good reason for them.

Corruption of federal institutions is not corruption if the other side is bad, like roaches that need exterminating.

The kind of circular reasoning that defines the sick, liberal mind. It is not the liberal that is sick – they are redeemable – but the liberals mind. Thank you systematically corrupt and biased media and education system.

I tried to follow your argument but I got lost in the circular reasoning, non-sequiturs, and projection of alt-right delusions onto the left. I’m still waiting for your list of Obama's Pants-On-Fire-worthy statements that brings his total in 8 years anywhere near the 2000 verifiable lies spewed by Trump in ONE year.

Here's the truth: Trump simply tells more lies. Sometimes the most obvious explanation fits best (Occam’s razor, right?). Analysis of a true *random* sample of statements from both parties would surely prove that. Politifact is merely reacting to the torrent of lies that spew from the POTUS every single day. Bias? No. Just serving their mission of setting the record straight with facts. Which they've done to politicians on BOTH sides with Pulitzer prize winning acclaim.