Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Points #1 & 2 may be factual but without direct knowledge of the economics are meaningless.
Point 3 is clearly speculative.
Point 4 is well known and has been debated ad naseum. While FCB has no direct financial investment, they clearly have invested a significant intangible asset, i.e. their name and brand. This was reinforced with the "Pro" designation clearly differentiating from licensed schools.
Point 5 appears to be math. The presentation also says Sept '19 whole facility inauguration, so there was no stated milestone at Oct 18.
Point 6 is a valid question that remains to be answered.
I don't know why you continue to post so negatively. LI soccer needs something to kick it in the rear because it woefully underperforms the rest of the tri-state area.
Frankly we want these super-clubs to gain real, true footholds in the US. They are realizing there is true talent in the US, and without solidarity payments, it's cheaper than anywhere else.
Comment