Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump blames parkland massacre on shooter’s “neighbors and classmates”

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    GUNSMOKERaids youngAPEStick tickle children on BOARD$wing smoke CHAINSport shackle*DIXON COUGH



    FIRST FATHER smoking feather BEDrains CRIBlames stable shepardix dogspitrack$lumber CHILDREN



    BERMUDA***** rogue gravenspot smoking caverns swampy kid ROWINGames canoestriplugym clearMOUNT.



    SNAP~kins SMOKING LUNCH PALE KIDragons wagonerspitux. WATCH NATURE FLOCKERS.



    SMOKING ANGRY BIRD$how EAGLES $WINGames NESTrap MOCKING~JAYBIRD SONGBIRD SINGER SANG.




    JESUS CHRIST IS THE SAVIOUR LORD GOD ALMIGHTY KING PRINCE OF PEACE JOYFUL HEALING PRIEST.




    COME LORD JESUS. YESHUA. JEHOVAH. LOVE. LIFE FAITH. HOPE. MERCY. PEACEFUL RISEN MESSIAH.




    KING OF HAVENS. GOD LOVES YOUTHink.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Absolutely love to see the companies taking a stand and cutting ties with the NRA. Getting rid of any benefit for NRA members like no credit cards with a NRA logo or no hotel or car rental discounts for being a NRA member.
      Companies are cutting their discount programs with the NRA. Probably cutting them so they can renegotiate their "gifts" to the NRA at better rates. You start trying to take away the 2nd Amendment, and the guns from US citizens, and that just makes the NRA stronger because, well, that's why they are there. Remember, guns don't kill people, "people" with guns kill people. Take away their guns and then they might use pipe bombs made from simple items at the hardware store. Then what, close down the hardware stores?

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Companies are cutting their discount programs with the NRA. Probably cutting them so they can renegotiate their "gifts" to the NRA at better rates. You start trying to take away the 2nd Amendment, and the guns from US citizens, and that just makes the NRA stronger because, well, that's why they are there. Remember, guns don't kill people, "people" with guns kill people. Take away their guns and then they might use pipe bombs made from simple items at the hardware store. Then what, close down the hardware stores?
        Yeah yeah. The old getting rid of some guns means getting rid of all guns nonsense. Some means some. Look it up if you struggle to understand that it does not mean all.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Companies are cutting their discount programs with the NRA. Probably cutting them so they can renegotiate their "gifts" to the NRA at better rates. You start trying to take away the 2nd Amendment, and the guns from US citizens, and that just makes the NRA stronger because, well, that's why they are there. Remember, guns don't kill people, "people" with guns kill people. Take away their guns and then they might use pipe bombs made from simple items at the hardware store. Then what, close down the hardware stores?
          You are part of the problem

          Comment


            Crazy, sick people committing murder all over the place.

            “Man used hunting knife in brutal slaying at Massachusetts library, authorities say”
            http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/25...ities-say.html

            Story says suspect “was known to the police”.

            How about if someone is “known to police” for chronic violations of the law (such as violating restraining orders), they be in jail. And stay in jail. Build more of them if space is limited. Hire more corrections professionals. Keep our streets safe. Nobody deserves to have a 10 inch knife embedded in their back by a wacko that "is known to police".

            But sadly, police do nothing about these folks that "are known to them". The wackos stay out there on the streets until they stab or shoot someone. Reason? Liberals. The original Devil's Advocates themselves.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Crazy, sick people committing murder all over the place.

              “Man used hunting knife in brutal slaying at Massachusetts library, authorities say”
              http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/25...ities-say.html

              Story says suspect “was known to the police”.

              How about if someone is “known to police” for chronic violations of the law (such as violating restraining orders), they be in jail. And stay in jail. Build more of them if space is limited. Hire more corrections professionals. Keep our streets safe. Nobody deserves to have a 10 inch knife embedded in their back by a wacko that "is known to police".

              But sadly, police do nothing about these folks that "are known to them". The wackos stay out there on the streets until they stab or shoot someone. Reason? Liberals. The original Devil's Advocates themselves.
              There are also laws in place to protect people's rights and not land them in jail for little reason or an institution. The hands of police are often tied and they often can't do anything until laws are broken. There's absolutely room for improvement and tightening of certain laws. But police have to do this tricky balancing act every day. The vast majority of people with mental illness will never commit a crime. Police can't read people's minds either.

              Comment


                Blame Liberalism

                The problem is much, much deeper than police hands being tied. Why are they tied?
                Consider this article below. It explains the true root of the problem (and its not guns).

                Crime and Punishment-Liberal vs Conservative
                "In Canada there are two different approaches to crime and punishment that reflect deeper philosophical differences between liberals and conservatives with respect to their views of human nature, the nature of morality, and the cause of criminal activity."

                http://passrobcp-lc.************

                Liberals do not believe in absolute morality, which is why so many are Godless. They believe the criminal is produced by an unjust society, a product of poverty, deprivation and social injustice and the failure of society to provide for the criminal's needs. Conservatives believe there are absolute moral values, that these values are instilled during the character formation years by family and religion and that individuals of ill-formed character and defective moral values are responsible for crimes.

                Liberals believe that the primary responsibility of the criminal justice system is to rehabilitate the criminal so that he can be re-integrated into society. The “system” is for criminals. Conservatives believe the primary responsibility of the criminal justice system is to protect the innocent from criminals, and that the “system” is there to protect good, law-abiding people.

                “If the early release of a criminal poses a potential threat to society, according to liberals it is a risk that society must bear for the welfare of the criminal and the furthering of his/her rehabilitation and re-integration into society”. (Thanks Liberals!)

                This is why Liberals believe in technicalities for findings of not guilty (even when guilty), minimal or conditional jail sentences, concurrent sentences, automatic/early parole, reduced sentencing guidelines, community service sentences and an emphasis on returning the criminal to the community as soon as possible. Criminal defense lawyers are almost always liberals. Their goal is to NOT incarcerate, or remove from society but to treat and release (hence, their constant whining about mental health budgets). They are literally the Devil’s Advocate. Nihilistic, amoral, compulsive, narcissistic, nubile/neotenous, godless liberals just don’t believe that some people are inherently, essentially bad/dangerous.
                Their delusion makes the world a much, much more dangerous place. It enables evil.

                Wherever you find school shootings, terror attacks, stabbings, bombings, rape, general chaos and violent craziness, you will find the footprint of liberalism.

                This is why, instead of addressing the root of the problem (liberalism itself), Liberals are focused on taking guns away from conservatives, their mortal enemies.

                This is truly a battle between good (conservative) and evil (liberal).

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  The problem is much, much deeper than police hands being tied. Why are they tied?
                  Consider this article below. It explains the true root of the problem (and its not guns).

                  Crime and Punishment-Liberal vs Conservative
                  "In Canada there are two different approaches to crime and punishment that reflect deeper philosophical differences between liberals and conservatives with respect to their views of human nature, the nature of morality, and the cause of criminal activity."

                  http://passrobcp-lc.************

                  Liberals do not believe in absolute morality, which is why so many are Godless. They believe the criminal is produced by an unjust society, a product of poverty, deprivation and social injustice and the failure of society to provide for the criminal's needs. Conservatives believe there are absolute moral values, that these values are instilled during the character formation years by family and religion and that individuals of ill-formed character and defective moral values are responsible for crimes.

                  Liberals believe that the primary responsibility of the criminal justice system is to rehabilitate the criminal so that he can be re-integrated into society. The “system” is for criminals. Conservatives believe the primary responsibility of the criminal justice system is to protect the innocent from criminals, and that the “system” is there to protect good, law-abiding people.

                  “If the early release of a criminal poses a potential threat to society, according to liberals it is a risk that society must bear for the welfare of the criminal and the furthering of his/her rehabilitation and re-integration into society”. (Thanks Liberals!)

                  This is why Liberals believe in technicalities for findings of not guilty (even when guilty), minimal or conditional jail sentences, concurrent sentences, automatic/early parole, reduced sentencing guidelines, community service sentences and an emphasis on returning the criminal to the community as soon as possible. Criminal defense lawyers are almost always liberals. Their goal is to NOT incarcerate, or remove from society but to treat and release (hence, their constant whining about mental health budgets). They are literally the Devil’s Advocate. Nihilistic, amoral, compulsive, narcissistic, nubile/neotenous, godless liberals just don’t believe that some people are inherently, essentially bad/dangerous.
                  Their delusion makes the world a much, much more dangerous place. It enables evil.

                  Wherever you find school shootings, terror attacks, stabbings, bombings, rape, general chaos and violent craziness, you will find the footprint of liberalism.

                  This is why, instead of addressing the root of the problem (liberalism itself), Liberals are focused on taking guns away from conservatives, their mortal enemies.

                  This is truly a battle between good (conservative) and evil (liberal).
                  "The politics of crime control" is a criminal justice course textbook, authored by KM Stenson, D Cowell and contains a thorough debate between the left and right on this topic, confirming much of what is said in the preceding post.

                  https://books.google.com/books?hl=en...iberal&f=false

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    "The politics of crime control" is a criminal justice course textbook, authored by KM Stenson, D Cowell and contains a thorough debate between the left and right on this topic, confirming much of what is said in the preceding post.

                    https://books.google.com/books?hl=en...iberal&f=false
                    Wait for it – here it comes – from the mentally libtarded individual who plagiarizes and lies about being a Republican – we will hear:

                    a) the terms “straw man argument” (denial is a common symptom of mental illness and therefore a common symptom of liberalism),
                    b) the use of red herring arguments in counter,
                    c) accusations involving the words “peer reviewed literature” (without actually ever providing any himself - even basic references of any sort), and
                    d) we will see attempts to smear the author of the book provided, particularly if he deviates in any way from liberal orthodoxy, producing a circular logic problem in that only a liberal source can provide evidence against liberalism (as if a liberal would do that).

                    All standard fare from the liberal playbook.

                    Comment


                      Who is paying these trolls?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Who is paying these trolls?
                        Trolls tend to write inane single sentence posts like the one you wrote, not well-reasoned arguments with citations backing them up that you are unable to fashion a response to.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          He's running for office and wisely is reading the mood of the voters
                          Yes it shows you how fast things can get improved.

                          Comment


                            when is Sheriff Isreal going to resign for dereliction of duty

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              The problem is much, much deeper than police hands being tied. Why are they tied?
                              Consider this article below. It explains the true root of the problem (and its not guns).

                              Crime and Punishment-Liberal vs Conservative
                              "In Canada there are two different approaches to crime and punishment that reflect deeper philosophical differences between liberals and conservatives with respect to their views of human nature, the nature of morality, and the cause of criminal activity."

                              http://passrobcp-lc.************

                              Liberals do not believe in absolute morality, which is why so many are Godless. They believe the criminal is produced by an unjust society, a product of poverty, deprivation and social injustice and the failure of society to provide for the criminal's needs. Conservatives believe there are absolute moral values, that these values are instilled during the character formation years by family and religion and that individuals of ill-formed character and defective moral values are responsible for crimes.

                              Liberals believe that the primary responsibility of the criminal justice system is to rehabilitate the criminal so that he can be re-integrated into society. The “system” is for criminals. Conservatives believe the primary responsibility of the criminal justice system is to protect the innocent from criminals, and that the “system” is there to protect good, law-abiding people.

                              “If the early release of a criminal poses a potential threat to society, according to liberals it is a risk that society must bear for the welfare of the criminal and the furthering of his/her rehabilitation and re-integration into society”. (Thanks Liberals!)

                              This is why Liberals believe in technicalities for findings of not guilty (even when guilty), minimal or conditional jail sentences, concurrent sentences, automatic/early parole, reduced sentencing guidelines, community service sentences and an emphasis on returning the criminal to the community as soon as possible. Criminal defense lawyers are almost always liberals. Their goal is to NOT incarcerate, or remove from society but to treat and release (hence, their constant whining about mental health budgets). They are literally the Devil’s Advocate. Nihilistic, amoral, compulsive, narcissistic, nubile/neotenous, godless liberals just don’t believe that some people are inherently, essentially bad/dangerous.
                              Their delusion makes the world a much, much more dangerous place. It enables evil.

                              Wherever you find school shootings, terror attacks, stabbings, bombings, rape, general chaos and violent craziness, you will find the footprint of liberalism.

                              This is why, instead of addressing the root of the problem (liberalism itself), Liberals are focused on taking guns away from conservatives, their mortal enemies.

                              This is truly a battle between good (conservative) and evil (liberal).
                              This was a great piece of description of Liberalism. Perfect!!!!!!!!

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by The Russian Troll, f.k.a. Libtard Guy View Post
                                Trolls tend to write inane single sentence posts like the one you wrote, not well-reasoned arguments with citations backing them up that you are unable to fashion a response to.
                                . . . says the Russian-backed troll in an inane single-sentence post, with nothing to back it up.

                                Your "citations", as you call them, are nothing more than repetitive copy/paste material from the database provided by your handlers. We now know that the Russian Internet Research Agency has cataloged a massive amount of disinformation and canned refutations of anything and everything that shines a bad light on the Trump-Russia agenda. Your claim of originality in anything you write is laughable.

                                Several truth-seekers on TS have taken the time to look deeper into some of your "references" and they nearly always turn out to be from disreputable sources with obvious agendas and depend upon unreliable/unverifiable data. You are not fooling anyone. You are not influencing anyone.

                                Please explain why your handlers are still paying you to post here, when there is zero evidence that anyone's mind has been changed by your drivel. Or have you gone rogue and you're just doing this for fun?

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X