Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

trump now pushing "Obamagate" conspiracy; can't say what that actually is

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    The race card

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    trump Wants to Make the 2020 Election a Referendum on Obama

    "Trump’s psychology is defined by his terror of rejection. The most stinging insult in his vast vocabulary of disdain is loser. And yet every poll, every powerful Biden TV ad, forces Trump to contemplate that he is headed toward a historic humiliation…"

    "Angry, scared, and aggrieved by the lack of praise for his efforts, Trump turns for safety to television, where his two-dimensional friends explain how everything is everybody else’s fault. They tell him that he is right and all his critics are wrong. They promise that miracle drugs will—poof!—make all his troubles vanish without effort. Sean and Tucker and Laura and Jeanine and the Fox & Friends romper room tell him stories that hold the terror at bay."

    "Donald Trump is growing more desperate every day at the prospect of becoming a loser. Given that his entire political existence hinges on the fact of the black president who preceded him, he is resorting to the one thing he knows best: racism."

    https://washingtonmonthly.com/2020/0...ndum-on-obama/
    The race card. Typical of a brainwashed libtard that knows it's over. Back to your safe and STFU.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Hogwash?? You forgot about all that evidence of shady connections between Russia and trump. If that's hogwash, please explain those 57 pieces of evidence. Also, explain trump's pro-Putin comments in Helsinki. You keep running away from those questions, I wonder why?
      I gotta go with the grown ups in the room who all testified under oath to NO EVIDENCE. They didn’t testify to no evidence minus your 57, did they? Nope. If career long intelligence specialist said they couldn’t find any evidence of collusion, then why would anyone entertain your conspiracy theories? You lost this one. No facts support your argument. We’re all waiting for you to produce the evidence that Clapper couldn’t. Changing threads doesn’t give your bullshît more credence. Any time now.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        I gotta go with the grown ups in the room who all testified under oath to NO EVIDENCE.
        You gonna keep lying about what they really said? You already got busted for hacking those quotes to edit out the parts you didn't like. Kindly refer to post #149 in the Financial leverage as kompromat thread to see the unedited testimony.

        Lie, twist, deceive. Such dishonesty. An agenda of hatred. That's no way to go through life, son.

        There is no smoking gun, and there may never be. trump made sure there were no witnesses to his meetings with Putin, and destroyed or confiscated any transcripts. And there is certainly no signed conspiracy agreement. But there tons of things that can only be explained if trump is compromised. I gave you 57 examples. If he's not compromised there must be an innocent explanation for all those things. So let's hear it. Start with trump's remarks at Helsinki. You can't keep running away from this.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          You gonna keep lying about what they really said? You already got busted for hacking those quotes to edit out the parts you didn't like. Kindly refer to post #149 in the Financial leverage as kompromat thread to see the unedited testimony.

          Lie, twist, deceive. Such dishonesty. An agenda of hatred. That's no way to go through life, son.

          There is no smoking gun, and there may never be. trump made sure there were no witnesses to his meetings with Putin, and destroyed or confiscated any transcripts. And there is certainly no signed conspiracy agreement. But there tons of things that can only be explained if trump is compromised. I gave you 57 examples. If he's not compromised there must be an innocent explanation for all those things. So let's hear it. Start with trump's remarks at Helsinki. You can't keep running away from this.
          Oh so I lied? Ok, where did Clapper, *****, Rhodes, Powers, Yates, McCabe, and Comey testify under oath there was evidence of Russia collusion? Please produce it. Make a liar out of me. Now is your chance. I got news for ya...concerns, pauses, gut feelings, and theories are as strong in the court of law as is your weak argument. It’s not what ya think, it what you can prove and so far you and our most experienced intelligence agents can’t prove a thing. As much as you want, You don’t have facts on your side. Once again, please provide proof of Russia collusion. We’re still waiting.

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Oh so I lied? Ok, where did Clapper, *****, Rhodes, Powers, Yates, McCabe, and Comey testify under oath there was evidence of Russia collusion? Please produce it. Make a liar out of me. Now is your chance. I got news for ya...concerns, pauses, gut feelings, and theories are as strong in the court of law as is your weak argument. It’s not what ya think, it what you can prove and so far you and our most experienced intelligence agents can’t prove a thing. As much as you want, You don’t have facts on your side. Once again, please provide proof of Russia collusion. We’re still waiting.
            BTW...how’s question #3 going? 😂

            Comment


              #21
              For the fools in the back...they tried to over throw the will of the people. Created a fake Russia collusion hoax, had the media help, and still lost...just wait...it’s all coming out...and in the end the coup organizers will be in jail..

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Oh so I lied? Ok, where did Clapper, *****, Rhodes, Powers, Yates, McCabe, and Comey testify under oath there was evidence of Russia collusion? Please produce it. Make a liar out of me. Now is your chance. I got news for ya...concerns, pauses, gut feelings, and theories are as strong in the court of law as is your weak argument. It’s not what ya think, it what you can prove and so far you and our most experienced intelligence agents can’t prove a thing. As much as you want, You don’t have facts on your side. Once again, please provide proof of Russia collusion. We’re still waiting.
                Even the appearance of being compromised by a hostile foreign power should be a dis-qualifier for the elected leader of the free world. Yet all you can do is scream for a smoking gun, which I've already explained will likely never come.

                It won't matter, though. trump will be judged first at the ballot box in November, then by the federal and state court systems. None of that is looking very good for him right now.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Even the appearance of being compromised by a hostile foreign power should be a dis-qualifier for the elected leader of the free world. Yet all you can do is scream for a smoking gun, which I've already explained will likely never come.

                  It won't matter, though. trump will be judged first at the ballot box in November, then by the federal and state court systems. None of that is looking very good for him right now.
                  All good but you fail to see that will be Obama or better yet his ss name “renegade”

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Fox News: John Brennan Suppressed Intel Saying Russia Wanted Hillary Clinton to Win
                    https://www.breitbart.com/national-s...llary-clinton/

                    Sounds like Obamagate to me

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Fox News: John Brennan Suppressed Intel Saying Russia Wanted Hillary Clinton to Win
                      https://www.breitbart.com/national-s...llary-clinton/

                      Sounds like Obamagate to me
                      This "news" brought to you by unnamed sources that contradict the entire U.S. Intelligence Community, the Mueller investigation, the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee, and Vladimir Putin himself.

                      I guess you missed my response the last three times you posted this.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Even the appearance of being compromised by a hostile foreign power should be a dis-qualifier for the elected leader of the free world. Yet all you can do is scream for a smoking gun, which I've already explained will likely never come.

                        It won't matter, though. trump will be judged first at the ballot box in November, then by the federal and state court systems. None of that is looking very good for him right now.
                        Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda? That’s where we are as a nation? Simple “appearance” is enough to undo an election? Thank God our great founders had the foresight to protect us from your kind. To think over 230 years ago, they had the intuition to know some Libtard keyboard warrior would try to justify taking down a presidency based on hatred, appearances, concerns, pauses, and gut feelings. Your “smoking gun” reference is called evidence which is something that most educated people understand is necessary to prove guilt. You have shown your obvious bias and hatred but what you have always failed to show is evidence. Put or shut up because nobody cares about your feelings.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda? That’s where we are as a nation? Simple “appearance” is enough to undo an election? Thank God our great founders had the foresight to protect us from your kind. To think over 230 years ago, they had the intuition to know some Libtard keyboard warrior would try to justify taking down a presidency based on hatred, appearances, concerns, pauses, and gut feelings. Your “smoking gun” reference is called evidence which is something that most educated people understand is necessary to prove guilt. You have shown your obvious bias and hatred but what you have always failed to show is evidence. Put or shut up because nobody cares about your feelings.
                          A presidential election is not a court trial with a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard of evidence. People will vote base on the evidence of their eyes and ears, despite trump's insistence that people should reject that evidence and believe him instead (See G. Orwell, "1984")

                          People can see that trump is obviously compromised by a hostile foreign power. And that he's an admitted sexual assaulter, pathological liar, racist, xenophobe, and misogynist. He will not win re-election this year. Then, free from presidential immunity, he will face justice for his other crimes. Unfortunately for him, there IS smoking gun evidence for those.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            A presidential election is not a court trial with a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard of evidence. People will vote base on the evidence of their eyes and ears, despite trump's insistence that people should reject that evidence and believe him instead (See G. Orwell, "1984")

                            People can see that trump is obviously compromised by a hostile foreign power. And that he's an admitted sexual assaulter, pathological liar, racist, xenophobe, and misogynist. He will not win re-election this year. Then, free from presidential immunity, he will face justice for his other crimes. Unfortunately for him, there IS smoking gun evidence for those.
                            Blah blah blah...I must have you rattled cause you’re all over the place. We’ve gone from lack of evidence for Russia collusion to presidential elections based on “eye & ear evidence”. What the fûck are you talking about? You’ll shît out anything to try to make some lame argument. That’s what happens when u can’t accept defeat. We get it, you’re not gonna vote for Trump. Shocker. Well, not sure who’s gonna beat Trump because the DNC just released a statement saying they are not officially endorsing Biden for president. It seems your own DNC doesn’t share your enthusiasm for China Joe. Good luck in November. Looks like you’re gonna need it more than ever. 😂

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              You gonna keep lying about what they really said? You already got busted for hacking those quotes to edit out the parts you didn't like. Kindly refer to post #149 in the Financial leverage as kompromat thread to see the unedited testimony.

                              Lie, twist, deceive. Such dishonesty. An agenda of hatred. That's no way to go through life, son.

                              There is no smoking gun, and there may never be. trump made sure there were no witnesses to his meetings with Putin, and destroyed or confiscated any transcripts. And there is certainly no signed conspiracy agreement. But there tons of things that can only be explained if trump is compromised. I gave you 57 examples. If he's not compromised there must be an innocent explanation for all those things. So let's hear it. Start with trump's remarks at Helsinki. You can't keep running away from this.
                              Hey trumptard, we're still waiting for you to explain all those disturbing trump-Russia connections. Start with trump's comments in Helsinki, please.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                Hey trumptard, we're still waiting for you to explain all those disturbing trump-Russia connections. Start with trump's comments in Helsinki, please.
                                Hey Libtard we’re still waiting for you to produce the evidence that Clapper, Rice, *****, Yates, Powers, McCabe, Brennen, and Comey couldn’t. You say you have it, can we please see it. How many times do we have to ask for it?

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X